Documents
-
- Download
- Title page_Table of contents
-
open access
-
- Download
- Acknowledgements
-
open access
-
- Download
- Chapter 1 Introduction
-
open access
-
- Download
- Chapter 10
-
open access
-
- Download
- Chapter 11
-
open access
-
- Download
- Chapter 12
-
open access
-
- Download
- Chapter 13
-
open access
-
- Download
- Chapter 14 Discussion and conclusion
-
open access
-
- Download
- Appendices_Notes
-
open access
-
- Download
- List of abbreviations_Archives_Bibliography
-
open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Dutch
-
open access
-
- Download
- Curriculum Vitae
-
open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
-
open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
'The Eurasian Question' : the colonial position and postcolonial options of colonial mixed ancestry groups from British India, Dutch East Indies and French Indochina compared
Eurasians were privileged groups of mixed ancestry in Asian colonial societies. They were the result of unions between European males and indigenous women. They neither belonged to the colonizers, nor to the colonized. When colonization came to an end, the Eurasians found themselves in a difficult position. The European rulers, on which their status was based, were gone. The new indigenous rulers usually perceived them suspiciously as colonial remnants and sometimes even as traitors. In this chaotic, sometimes violent situation, they had to decide where they belonged: in the country of their European fathers or the former colony, the country of their Asian mothers. This was a serious dilemma since they only knew the mother country from stories and lessons at school. In this project I have compared the position and options of the Indo-Europeans with those of similar groups from two other former Asian co lonies, the Anglo-Indians...
Show moreEurasians were privileged groups of mixed ancestry in Asian colonial societies. They were the result of unions between European males and indigenous women. They neither belonged to the colonizers, nor to the colonized. When colonization came to an end, the Eurasians found themselves in a difficult position. The European rulers, on which their status was based, were gone. The new indigenous rulers usually perceived them suspiciously as colonial remnants and sometimes even as traitors. In this chaotic, sometimes violent situation, they had to decide where they belonged: in the country of their European fathers or the former colony, the country of their Asian mothers. This was a serious dilemma since they only knew the mother country from stories and lessons at school. In this project I have compared the position and options of the Indo-Europeans with those of similar groups from two other former Asian co lonies, the Anglo-Indians from British India and the Métis people from French Indochina. This study of Eurasians from three former colonies showed that an emancipation paradox of acquiring more rights while discriminated against more at the same time was instrumental in creating the framework in which Eurasians had to make their choices.
Show less- All authors
- Rosen Jacobson, L.
- Supervisor
- Schrover, M.L.J.C.
- Co-supervisor
- Glynn, I.
- Committee
- Buettner, E.A.; Hart, B. de; Oostindie, G.J.
- Qualification
- Doctor (dr.)
- Awarding Institution
- Institute for History , Humanities , Leiden University
- Date
- 2018-05-30
- Title of host publication
- Historische Migratiestudies
- Publisher
- Hilversum: Uitgeverij Verloren BV
Publication Series
- Name
- 6
Funding
- Sponsorship
- NWO, via N.W. Posthumus Institute, Research School for Economic and Social History