Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4283162
Documents
-
- Full Text
- under embargo until 2026-11-19
-
- Download
- Title Pages_Contents
-
open access
-
- Download
- Part I: Chapter 2
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Part I: Chapter 3
- under embargo until 2026-11-19
-
- Download
- Part I: Chapter 4
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Part I: Chapter 5
- under embargo until 2026-11-19
-
- Download
- Part II: Chapter 6
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Part II: Chapter 7
- under embargo until 2026-11-19
-
- Download
- Part III: Chapter 8
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Download
- Part III: Chapter 9
-
open access
- Full text at publishers site
-
- Download
- Part III: Chapter 10
-
open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Dutch
-
open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
-
open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Assessment for growth: fostering student learning through assessment innovations in medical education
First, the very short answer question (VSAQ) requires students to construct brief responses rather than choose from multiple-choice options. VSAQs demonstrate greater reliability, reduce the influence of guessing, and provide a more accurate representation of students’ actual knowledge. They also enable early identification of learners in need of additional support or greater challenge.
Second, the computer-adaptive progress test (CAT) tailors item difficulty to each student’s proficiency level. This method improves efficiency and measurement precision while offering students across different study years a more equitable view of their knowledge development.
Finally, the dissertation...Show moreAssessment serves not only to measure knowledge but also to stimulate student learning. This dissertation investigates three innovations that can advance assessment practices in medical education: a novel question format, adaptive testing, and the use of feedback.
First, the very short answer question (VSAQ) requires students to construct brief responses rather than choose from multiple-choice options. VSAQs demonstrate greater reliability, reduce the influence of guessing, and provide a more accurate representation of students’ actual knowledge. They also enable early identification of learners in need of additional support or greater challenge.
Second, the computer-adaptive progress test (CAT) tailors item difficulty to each student’s proficiency level. This method improves efficiency and measurement precision while offering students across different study years a more equitable view of their knowledge development.
Finally, the dissertation examines how students engage with feedback. Although feedback holds strong potential to enhance learning, its impact is often limited when not linked to study credits. Clear guidance, timely delivery, and structured support are essential for its effective use.
Overall, these findings illustrate how assessment can evolve from a mere measurement instrument into a powerful driver of learning, fostering fairer evaluations and the development of competent physicians.Show less
- All authors
- Wijk, E.V. van
- Supervisor
- Langers, A.M.J.; Dekker, F.W.
- Co-supervisor
- Blankenstein, F.M. van
- Committee
- Steendijk, P.; Schuwirth, L.W.T.; Schaaf, M.F. van der; Heeneman, S.; Jonge, M.O. de
- Qualification
- Doctor (dr.)
- Awarding Institution
- Faculty of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden University
- Date
- 2025-11-19