Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3618335
Documents
-
- Download
- Title Pages_Foreword_Contents
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 1 : Chapter 3
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 1 : Chapter 4
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 1 : Chapter 5
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 1 : Chapter 6
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 2: Chapter 7
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 2 : Chapter 8
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 2 : Chapter 9
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 3 : Chapter 10
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 3 : Chapter 11
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 3 : Chapter 12
- open access
-
- Download
- Part 3 : Chapter 13
- open access
-
- Download
- Summary in English
- open access
-
- Download
- Bibliography_Indices_Curriculum Vitae
- open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
- open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Het rechterlijk bevel en verbod als remedie
Using supranational law, the requirements that a remedy must meet to be effective are examined. It concludes that a remedy is effective if it can enforce substantive rights, can be deployed in a timely manner, has a deterrent function and is proportionate.
Three themes are then used to examine whether the national regime is in line with those requirements. In that regard, the role and freedom of the courts, the situation where performance has become impossible, and collective actions against the government are examined.
The conclusion is that the national regulation is adequate.
- All authors
- Helm, J.J. van der
- Supervisor
- Krans, H.B.; Wissink, M.H.
- Committee
- Castermans, A.G.; Groot, G. de; Rijssen, G. van; Vriesendorp, R.D.
- Qualification
- Doctor (dr.)
- Awarding Institution
- Institute of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Leiden University
- Date
- 2023-05-16
- Title of host publication
- Burgerlijk Proces & Praktijk
- Publisher
- Deventer: Wolters Kluwer
- ISBN (print)
- 9789013171952
Publication Series
- Name
- 23