Persistent URL of this record https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4283023
Documents
-
- Download
- Title Pages_Contents
-
open access
-
- Download
- Introduction
-
open access
-
- Download
- Conclusion
-
open access
-
- Download
- Bibliography
-
open access
-
- Download
- Summary in Dutch
-
open access
-
- Download
- Summary in English
-
open access
-
- Download
- Acknowledgements_Curriculum Vitae
-
open access
-
- Download
- Propositions
-
open access
In Collections
This item can be found in the following collections:
Making futures? Technology start-ups in Singapore
It develops an ethnographic approach to futurities—culturally specific ways of imagining and structuring futures—showing how they are lived, embodied, and contested.
In Singapore, start-up futurities promised empowerment, innovation, and growth, yet relied on hard labour, hidden resources, and practices that reproduced inequalities.
Across six domains—global imaginaries, state agendas, ecosystems, companies, subjectivity, and embodiment—the analysis traces how start-up futurities demanded radical malleability of ideas, places, selves, and bodies, but proved fragile: as infrastructural constraints, financial precarity, and the gendered and racialised bodies exposed the limits of entrepreneurial flexibility.
Start-up culture sustained optimism and entrepreneurial risk-taking...Show moreThis dissertation examines the cultural significance of the future through an ethnographic study of everyday practices of early-stage technology start-ups in Singapore (2010–2016).
It develops an ethnographic approach to futurities—culturally specific ways of imagining and structuring futures—showing how they are lived, embodied, and contested.
In Singapore, start-up futurities promised empowerment, innovation, and growth, yet relied on hard labour, hidden resources, and practices that reproduced inequalities.
Across six domains—global imaginaries, state agendas, ecosystems, companies, subjectivity, and embodiment—the analysis traces how start-up futurities demanded radical malleability of ideas, places, selves, and bodies, but proved fragile: as infrastructural constraints, financial precarity, and the gendered and racialised bodies exposed the limits of entrepreneurial flexibility.
Start-up culture sustained optimism and entrepreneurial risk-taking while serving state planning and capitalist valuation. Far from universal, start-up futurities were contingent, historically situated, and marked by contradictions, revealing how neoliberal capitalism is lived and reproduced through everyday efforts to “invent the future.”Show less
- All authors
- Kripe, Z.
- Supervisor
- Pels, P.J.
- Co-supervisor
- Barendregt, B.A.
- Committee
- Spierenburg, M.J.; Grasseni, C.; Schneider, F.A.; Lindtner, S.M.; Baas, M.
- Qualification
- Doctor (dr.)
- Awarding Institution
- Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University
- Date
- 2025-11-13
Funding
- Sponsorship
- NWO