Objective: To investigate factors that cause impairment of hand function in children with an upper Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy (NBPP), we performed an in-depth analysis of tactile hand... Show moreObjective: To investigate factors that cause impairment of hand function in children with an upper Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy (NBPP), we performed an in-depth analysis of tactile hand sensibility, especially the ability to correctly localize a sensory stimulus on their fingers.Design: A cross-sectional investigation of children with NBPP, compared with healthy controls. The thickest Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofila-ment was pressed on the radial or ulnar part of each fingertip (10 regions), while a screen prevented seeing the hand.Setting: Tertiary referral center for nerve lesions in an academic hospital in The Netherlands. The control group was recruited at their school.Participants: Forty-one children with NBPP (mean age 10.0 y) and 25 controls (mean age 9.5 y; N=41). Interventions: Not applicable.Main Outcomes Measures: Correct localization of the applied stimuli was evaluated, per region, per finger, and per dermatome with a test score. The affected side of the NBPP group was compared with the non-dominant hand of the controls.Results: The ability to localize stimuli on the tips of the fingers in children with an upper NBPP was significantly diminished in all fingers, except for the little finger, as compared with healthy controls. Mean localization scores were 6.6 (thumb) and 6.3 (index finger) in the NBPP group and 7.6 in both fingers for controls (maximum score possible is 8.0). Localization scores were significant lower in regions attributed to dermatomes C6 (P<.001) and C7 (P=.001), but not to C8 (P=.115).Conclusion: Children with an upper NBPP showed a diminished and incorrect ability to localize sensory stimuli to their fingers. This finding is likely 1 of the factors underlying the impairment of hand function and should be addressed with sensory focused therapy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;104:872-7 & COPY; 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Show less
Meijeren-Pont, W. van; Arwert, H.; Volker, G.; Fiocco, M.; Achterberg, W.P.; Vlieland, T.P.M.V.; ... ; Stroke Cohort Outcomes REhabil (SCORE) Study Group 2023
Purpose: To assess the presence of upper extremity pain after stroke over time and the course of its intensity in patients with persistent pain. Materials and methods: Patients with stroke... Show morePurpose: To assess the presence of upper extremity pain after stroke over time and the course of its intensity in patients with persistent pain. Materials and methods: Patients with stroke completed a question on the presence of upper extremity pain (yes/no) and rated its intensity with a visual analogue scale (0-10) at 3, 18, and 30 months after starting multidisciplinary rehabilitation. The presence of upper extremity pain and its intensity over time were analysed with Generalized Estimating Equations models and Linear Mixed Models, respectively. Results: 678 patients were included. The proportions of patients reporting upper extremity pain were 41.8, 36.0, and 32.7% at 3, 18, and 30 months, respectively, with the decline in proportions reaching statistical significance (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.92, p < 0.001). At all time points, in those reporting pain the median intensity was 5.0 (interquartile ranges (IQR) 4.0-7.0 at 3 and 3.0-6.0 at 18 and 30 months). In the 73 patients with persistent pain, there was no significant change in intensity over time. Conclusions: The proportion of patients reporting upper extremity pain after stroke was considerable, despite a significant decrease in 2.5 years. In patients reporting persistent pain, the intensity did not change over time. Show less
