BackgroundAffective (i.e. depressive and anxiety) disorders often co-occur with immunometabolic diseases and related biological pathways. Although many large population-based and meta-analytic... Show moreBackgroundAffective (i.e. depressive and anxiety) disorders often co-occur with immunometabolic diseases and related biological pathways. Although many large population-based and meta-analytic studies have confirmed this link in community and clinical samples, studies in at-risk samples of siblings of persons with affective disorders are lacking. Furthermore, this somatic-mental co-occurrence may be partially explained by familial clustering of the conditions. First, we examined whether the association between a wide range of immunometabolic diseases and related biomarker based risk-profiles with psychological symptoms replicates in at-risk siblings of probands with affective disorders. Second, leveraging on a sibling-pair design, we disentangled and quantified the effect of probands’ immunometabolic health on siblings’ psychological symptoms and on the association between immunometabolic health and these symptoms in siblings.MethodsThe sample included 636 participants (Mage = 49.7; 62.4% female) from 256 families, each including a proband with lifetime depressive and/or anxiety disorders and at least one of their sibling(s) (N = 380 proband-sibling pairs). Immunometabolic health included cardiometabolic and inflammatory diseases, body mass index (BMI), and composite metabolic (based on the five metabolic syndrome components) and inflammatory (based on interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein) biomarker indices. Overall affective symptoms and specific atypical, energy-related depressive symptoms were derived from self-report questionnaires. Mixed-effects analyses were used to model familial clustering.ResultsIn siblings, inflammatory disease (γ = 0.25, p = 0.013), higher BMI (γ = 0.10, p = 0.033) and metabolic index (γ = 0.28, p < 0.001) were associated with higher affective symptoms, with stronger associations for atypical, energy-related depressive symptoms (additionally associated with cardiometabolic disease; γ = 0.56, p = 0.048). Immunometabolic health in probands was not independently associated with psychological symptoms in siblings nor did it moderate the association between immunometabolic health and psychological symptoms estimated in siblings.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the link between later life immunometabolic health and psychological symptoms is consistently present also in adult siblings at high risk for affective disorders. Familial clustering did not appear to have a substantial impact on this association. Instead, individual lifestyle, rather than familial factors, may have a relatively higher impact in the clustering of later life immunometabolic conditions with psychological symptoms in at-risk adult individuals. Furthermore, results highlighted the importance of focusing on specific depression profiles when investigating the overlap with immunometabolic health. Show less
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is linked to higher cardio-metabolic comorbidity that may in part be due to the low-grade inflammation and poorer metabolic health observed in MDD.... Show moreBackground: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is linked to higher cardio-metabolic comorbidity that may in part be due to the low-grade inflammation and poorer metabolic health observed in MDD. Heterogeneity of MDD is however large, and immune-inflammatory and metabolic dysregulation is present in only part of the MDD cases. We examined the associations of four depression dimensional profilers (atypical energy-related symptom dimension, melancholic symptom dimension, childhood trauma severity, and anxious distress symptom dimension) with immuno-metabolic outcomes, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally.Methods: Three waves covering a 6-year follow-up (>7000 observations) of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) were used. Depression profilers were based on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Childhood Trauma index. An inflammatory index (based on IL-6 and CRP), a metabolic syndrome index (based on the five metabolic syndrome components), and a combination of these two indices were constructed. Mixed models were used for cross-sectional and longitudinal models, controlling for covariates.Results: Of the four depression profilers, only the atypical, energy-related symptom dimension showed robust associations with higher scores on the inflammatory, metabolic syndrome and combined inflammatory-metabolic indexes cross-sectionally, as well as at follow-up. The melancholic symptom dimension was associated with lower scores on the metabolic syndrome index both cross-sectionally and longitudinally.Conclusion: The atypical energy-related symptom dimension was linked to poorer immune-inflammatory and metabolic health, while the melancholic symptom dimension was linked to relatively better metabolic health. Persons with high atypical energy-related symptom burden, representing an immuno-metabolic depression, may be the most important group to target in prevention programs for cardiometabolic disease, and may benefit most from treatments targeting immuno-metabolic pathways. Show less
Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been associated with both early- and late-life depression. This study investigated whether baseline MetS and its individual components are associated with... Show moreBackground: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been associated with both early- and late-life depression. This study investigated whether baseline MetS and its individual components are associated with the course of depression over six years among older persons with a formal depression diagnosis.Methods: Data were used from 378 older persons with a depressive disorder from the Netherlands Study of Depression in Old age (NESDO) with a 6-year follow-up. A formal depression diagnosis according to DSM-IV-TR criteria was ascertained with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Severity of depressive symptoms was assessed with the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology at 6-month intervals. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined according the modified National Cholesterol Education Programme - Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Primary outcome was time to remission from depression. We applied cox regression analysis for the primary outcome and linear mixed models for secondary analyses.Results: Neither MetS nor its individual components were associated with time to remission from depression (MetS: HR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.74 - 1.44; p = 0.85), or with depression severity (MetS: B = 0.02; SE = 0.04; p = 0.64) and course of depressive symptoms (MetS: B = -0.01; SE = 0.01; p = 0.23) over 6-years follow-up.Limitations: Attrition was relatively high (46.8%). Furthermore, we only had information on formal depression diagnosis at baseline, 2-year, and 6-year follow-up.Conclusions: We found no evidence for an effect of baseline presence of metabolic dysregulation on the course of formally diagnosed depression in older persons. Metabolic syndrome in depressed patients should be clinically monitored for other reasons than predicting chronicity or severity of depression. Show less
