BackgroundSuriname is a uppermiddle-income country with a relatively high prevalence of preventable pregnancy complications. Access to and usage of high-quality maternity care services are lacking.... Show moreBackgroundSuriname is a uppermiddle-income country with a relatively high prevalence of preventable pregnancy complications. Access to and usage of high-quality maternity care services are lacking. The implementation of group care (GC) may yield maternal and child health improvements. However, before introducing a complex intervention it is pivotal to develop an understanding of the local context to inform the implementation process.MethodsA context analysis was conducted to identify local needs toward maternity and postnatal care services, and to assess contextual factor relevant to implementability of GC. During a Rapid Qualitative Inquiry, 63 online and face-to-face semi-structured interviews were held with parents, community members, on-and off-site healthcare professionals, policy makers, and one focus group with parents was conducted. Audio recordings were transcribed in verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis and Framework Method. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research served as a base for the coding tree, which was complemented with inductively derived codes.ResultsTen themes related to implementability, one theme related to sustainability, and seven themes related to reaching and participation of the target population in GC were identified. Factors related to health care professionals (e.g., workload, compatibility, ownership, role clarity), to GC, to recipients and to planning impact the implementability of GC, while sustainability is in particular hampered by sparse financial and human resources. Reach affects both implementability and sustainability. Yet, outer setting and attitudinal barriers of health professionals will likely affect reach.ConclusionsMulti-layered contextual factors impact not only implementability and sustainability of GC, but also reach of parents. We advise future researchers and implementors of GC to investigate not only determinants for implementability and sustainability, but also those factors that may hamper, or facilitate up-take. Practical, attitudinal and cultural barriers to GC participation need to be examined. Themes identified in this study will inspire the development of adaptations and implementation strategies at a later stage. Show less
Older emergency department (ED) patients are at high risk of adverse health outcomes, such as mortality or functional decline. Early identification of those patients who are at highest risk gives... Show moreOlder emergency department (ED) patients are at high risk of adverse health outcomes, such as mortality or functional decline. Early identification of those patients who are at highest risk gives an opportunity to target interventions and guide treatment decisions for those who need it most.This thesis describes the clinical value of using geriatric screening in the ED. Geriatric screening identifies older patients at high risk of both short- and long-term poor outcomes and provides valuable information for care providers treating acutely hospitalized older patients. The results from screening could aid in individualized treatment decisions to acquire more personalized care, and therefore gives an opportunity to optimize outcomes for older patients.Implementation of screening programs in the fast-paced environment of everyday ED practice remains scarce. The results of this thesis show that the implementation of a geriatric screening program in routine ED practice is feasible and the use of screening is accepted by both the users (triage nurses) and the older patients.Using geriatric screening in routine care is therefore useful and feasible. More research will be needed to investigate implementation in different hospitals to generate guidance on how geriatric screening tools can be successfully implemented on a wide scale. Show less
Blomaard, L.C.; Groot, B. de; Lucke, J.A.; Gelder, J. de; Booijen, A.M.; Gussekloo, J.; Mooijaart, S.P. 2021
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED... Show moreObjective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. Methods We conducted an implementation study with before-after design, using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for quality improvement, in the ED of a Dutch academic hospital. All consecutive patients >= 70 years during 2 months before and after implementation were included. The APOP program comprises screening for risk of functional decline, mortality and cognitive impairment, targeted interventions for high-risk patients and education of professionals. Outcome measures were compliance with interventions and impact on ED process, length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission rate. Results Two comparable groups of patients (median age 77 years) were included before (n = 920) and after (n = 953) implementation. After implementation 560 (59%) patients were screened of which 190 (34%) were high-risk patients. Some of the program interventions for high-risk patients in the ED were adhered to, some were not. More hospitalized patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) after implementation (21% before vs. 31% after; p = 0.002). In 89% of high-risk patients who were discharged to home, telephone follow-up was initiated. Implementation did not influence median ED LOS (202 min before vs. 196 min after; p = 0.152) or hospital admission rate (40% before vs. 39% after; p = 0.410). Conclusion Implementation of the APOP screening program in routine ED care did not negatively impact the ED process and resulted in an increase of CGA and telephone follow-up in older patients. Future studies should investigate whether sustainable changes in management and patient outcomes occur after more PDSA cycles. Show less
