Background Treatment of patients with hemophilia has advanced over the past decades, but it is unknown whether this has resulted in a normal life expectancy in the Netherlands.Objective This... Show moreBackground Treatment of patients with hemophilia has advanced over the past decades, but it is unknown whether this has resulted in a normal life expectancy in the Netherlands.Objective This observational cohort study aimed to assess all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with hemophilia in the Netherlands between 2001 and 2018 and to compare mortality and life expectancy with previous survival assessments from 1973 onward.Patients/methods All 1066 patients with hemophilia who participated in a nationwide survey in 2001 were followed until July 2018.Results Information on 1031 individuals (97%) was available, of whom 142 (14%) deceased during follow-up. Compared with the general Dutch male population, mortality of patients with hemophilia was still increased (standardized mortality ratio: 1.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.2-1.7). Intracranial bleeding and malignancies were the most common causes of death. Estimated median life expectancy of patients with hemophilia was 77 years, 6 years lower than the median life expectancy of the general Dutch male population (83 years). Over the past 45 years, death rates of patients with hemophilia have consistently decreased, approaching the survival experience of the general population. Over the past decades, mortality due to human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infections has decreased, death due to intracranial hemorrhages has increased, and death due to ischemic heart disease has remained consistently low over time.Conclusions Survival in patients with hemophilia in the Netherlands has improved over time but is still lower than that of the general population. Show less
Policy-makers and clinicians are faced with a gap of evidence to guide policy on standards for HIV outpatient care. Ongoing debates include which settings of care improve health outcomes, and how... Show morePolicy-makers and clinicians are faced with a gap of evidence to guide policy on standards for HIV outpatient care. Ongoing debates include which settings of care improve health outcomes, and how many HIV-infected patients a health-care provider should treat to gain and maintain expertise. In this article, we evaluate the studies that link health-care facility and care provider characteristics (i.e., structural factors) to health outcomes in HIV-infected patients. We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, PUBMED, and EMBASE from inception until 1 January 2015. We included a total of 28 observational studies that were conducted after the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy in 1996. Three aspects of the available research linking the structure to quality of HIV outpatient care were evaluated: (1) assessed structural characteristics (i.e., health-care facility and care provider characteristics); (2) measures of quality of HIV outpatient care; and (3) reported associations between structural characteristics and quality of care. Rather than scarcity of data, it is the diversity in methodology in the identified studies and the inconsistency of their results that led us to the conclusion that the scientific evidence is too weak to guide policy in HIV outpatient care. We provide recommendations on how to address this heterogeneity in future studies and offer specific suggestions for further reading that could be of interest for clinicians and researchers. Show less
Objective:Successful treatment of people infected with HIV requires that patients are retained in HIV care, use combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and ultimately reach and sustain viral... Show moreObjective:Successful treatment of people infected with HIV requires that patients are retained in HIV care, use combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and ultimately reach and sustain viral suppression. Our aim was to identify health facility characteristics associated with these steps in the cascade of HIV care.Design:Retrospective cohort study.Methods:We included data from all adult HIV-1-infected patients who entered care in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2013 (N=7120). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the associations between health facility characteristics and the outcomes currently in care', initiated cART', and viral suppression'.Results:The proportion of patients currently in care' was high in all 26 treatment centres. cART initiation was positively associated with the accreditation of the health facility [OR (odds ratio): 1.62; 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.18-2.23] and the performance of an internal audit in the preceding 3 years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.02-1.81). The odds of cART initiation were higher in middle-sized (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.25-3.21) and large HIV treatment centres (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.14-2.84) compared with small centres (<300 HIV-infected patients). Viral suppression was negatively associated with the presence of a social worker in the HIV treatment team (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.91).Conclusions:Our results confirm that appointing expert HIV treatment centres facilitates retention in care and that a minimum volume requirement may be desirable. Our findings suggest that quality assessment through accreditation and the measurement of performance benefits the delivery of HIV care. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Show less
Snijdewind, I.J.M.; Smit, C.; Schutten, M.; Nellen, F.J.B.; Kroon, F.P.; Reiss, P.; Ende, M.E. van der 2015
