The main aim of this computational modelling study was to test the validity of the hypothesis that sensitivity to the polarity of cochlear implant stimulation can be interpreted as a measure of... Show moreThe main aim of this computational modelling study was to test the validity of the hypothesis that sensitivity to the polarity of cochlear implant stimulation can be interpreted as a measure of neural health. For this purpose, the effects of stimulus polarity on neural excitation patterns were investigated in a volume conduction model of the implanted human cochlea, which was coupled with a deterministic active nerve fibre model based on characteristics of human auditory neurons. The nerve fibres were modelled in three stages of neural degeneration: intact, with shortened peripheral terminal nodes and with complete loss of the peripheral processes. The model simulated neural responses to monophasic, biphasic, triphasic and pseudomonophasic pulses of both polarities. Polarity sensitivity was quantified as the so-called polarity effect (PE), which is defined as the dB difference between cathodic and anodic thresholds. Results showed that anodic pulses mostly excited the auditory neurons in their central axons, while cathodic stimuli generally excited neurons in their peripheral processes or near their cell bodies. As a consequence, cathodic thresholds were more affected by neural degeneration than anodic thresholds. Neural degeneration did not have a consistent effect on the modelled PE values, though there were notable effects of electrode contact insertion angle and distance from the modiolus. Furthermore, determining PE values using charge-balanced multiphasic pulses as approximations of monophasic stimuli produced different results than those obtained with true monophasic pulses, at a degree that depended on the specific pulse shape; in general, pulses with lower secondary phase amplitudes showed polarity sensitivities closer to those obtained with true monophasic pulses. The main conclusion of this study is that polarity sensitivity is not a reliable indicator of neural health; neural degeneration affects simulated polarity sensitivity, but its effect is not consistently related to the degree of degeneration. Polarity sensitivity is not simply a product of the state of the neurons, but also depends on spatial factors.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) Show less
