MHC class I (MHC-I) molecules present a blueprint of the intracellular proteome to T cells allowing them to control infection or malignant transformation. As a response, pathogens and tumor cells... Show moreMHC class I (MHC-I) molecules present a blueprint of the intracellular proteome to T cells allowing them to control infection or malignant transformation. As a response, pathogens and tumor cells often downmodulate MHC-I mediated antigen presentation to escape from immune surveillance. Although the fundamental rules of antigen presentation are known in detail, the players in this system are not saturated and new modules of regulation have recently been uncovered. Here, we update the understanding of antigen presentation by MHC-I molecules and how this can be exploited by tumors to prevent exposure of the intracellular proteome. This knowledge can provide new ways to improve immune responses against tumors and pathogens. Show less
MHC class I antigen-presentation plays a pivotal role in anti-tumor immunity. High surface expression of MHC-I molecules is generally correlated with high CD8 T cell infiltrate and improved overall... Show moreMHC class I antigen-presentation plays a pivotal role in anti-tumor immunity. High surface expression of MHC-I molecules is generally correlated with high CD8 T cell infiltrate and improved overall survival in many cancers. In contrast, partial or complete loss of MHC-I surface expression is associated with reduced survival and primary-resistance to immunotherapy in cancers. Expression of additional molecules in the tumor microenvironment (TME), such as PD-L1 and HLA-E, further shape immune responses. The presence of immune cells and the expression of immune-related genes together determine the ‘immune landscape’ of cancers, while the local production of interferons strongly impacts this environment. Although MHC-I and PD-L1 are both regulated by the IFN pathway, an in-depth study on immune escape of NSCLC showed that the expression of co-inhibitory markers and the loss of MHC-I expression are two independent mechanisms of immune evasion. This classifies tumors into different “types” depending on their MHC-I and PD-L1 expression. The differential expression of MHC-I and PD-L1 suggests that immune-escape of cancer cells occurs through a multitude of distinct “hard-wired” and “soft-wired” modifications and knowing which of the mechanisms underlie immune escape determines which immunotherapeutic strategy has the most potential for clinical success. Show less
Cytotoxic T cell epitopes are the targets for a T cell mediated immunotherapy of cancer. The thesis reports on their identification in the tumor associated proteins BCR-ABL and PRAME by the reverse... Show moreCytotoxic T cell epitopes are the targets for a T cell mediated immunotherapy of cancer. The thesis reports on their identification in the tumor associated proteins BCR-ABL and PRAME by the reverse immunology (prediction) strategy. An extended strategy is used, including the analysis of the C-terminal generation of potential epitopes by the proteasome. Novel HLA class I peptide binding assays were developed to enable further epitope discovery. Fundamental studies were performed to identify novel non-proteasomal cytosolic endopeptidases in the HLA class I antigen processing pathway. Nardilysin and thimet oligopeptidase were identified to generate in a concerted action an HLA-A3 restricted CTL epitope from PRAME. The general roles of nardilysin and TOP in class I processing were investigated. Show less
Surgery is the most effective cancer therapy, followed by radiotherapy. These techniques usually target tumour specific tissue only, unlike most forms of chemotherapy as is best illustrated by the... Show moreSurgery is the most effective cancer therapy, followed by radiotherapy. These techniques usually target tumour specific tissue only, unlike most forms of chemotherapy as is best illustrated by the relatively moderate side effects of such treatments. When the immune system could find and destroy tumour cells, they (and their metastases) would be selectively destroyed without to many side effects as well. But then tumour cells have to be recognized and this requires presentation of tumour specific proteins to the immune system. This process called antigen presentation by the MHC class I molecules is studied here. Chapter 1 and 2 form an introduction to the ubiquitin proteasome system and the MHC class I antigen presentation route, which is operational in most cell types and is involved in presentation of antigens derived from degraded intracellular proteins (of self, tumour or viral origin). Proteins are not randomly degraded, but targeted for degradation by ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like post-translational modifications and subsequently degraded by the major cellular protease, the proteasome. Proteins are not only targeted for degradation because they are old, they may also be targeted for example in a cell cycle specific way or just because they have not been folded correctly during protein synthesis. Further trimming to free amino acids by other proteases follows degradation of cellular proteins by the proteasome. Only a minor pool of peptides that meets the requirements for antigen presentation may circumvent further degradation by binding to proteins involved in MHC class I presentation, like the transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP), and MHC class I itself. Once the peptide is loaded onto MHC class I, the MHC class I-peptide complex can be transported to the plasma membrane. Here, the peptide is presented to cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs), which can in this way examine the intracellular protein content in their search for foreign content. The first step in antigen presentation by MHC class I is the decoration of target proteins with a degradation signal. The first discovered and best-studied degradation signal is a polymer of ubiquitin proteins. A ubiquitin polymer of more than four ubiquitin proteins can be recognized by the proteasome and subsequently unfolded, de-ubiquitylated and degraded by the proteasome. Free ubiquitin and mono- ubiquitylated proteins are not targets for degradation, but serve other functions. Most studies on ubiquitin have been of biochemical nature, but the introduction of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) allowed the study of ubiquitin behaviour in living cells. It was shown before that a GFP-ubiquitin construct could be stably expressed in human cells. In chapter 4, we have used this chimeric protein to study ubiquitin in living cells under normal cell culture conditions and during proteotoxic cell stress as the result of proteasome inhibition, and heat shock. In untreated cells we were able to confirm previous biochemical experiments showing that a large pool of ubiquitin molecules is coupled to histone 2A and 2B in the nucleus, whereas a small pool of ubiquitin is present as free monomers in both nucleus and cytosol. A third pool of ubiquitin was present in the form of ubiquitin polymers in both the nucleus and the cytosol. Manipulation of the cells with different proteotoxic stress conditions revealed a rapid de-ubiquitylation of the histone-bound ubiquitin pool in favour of poly-ubiquitin chains, which may even reach a size similar to the proteasome complex, which is at least one hundred times bigger as a single ubiquitin molecule. These rapid changes in the ubiquitin equilibrium do not only affect proteasomal degradation, but also induce chromatin condensation and altered gene transcription, thus establishing cross talk between these, at first sight unrelated, cellular processes. Alterations in the UPS are correlated with a variety of human pathologies, like cancer, immunological disorders, inflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. The exact role of the UPS in the pathophysiology of these diseases however, remains poorly understood. Because ubiquitin and the ubiquitin proteasome system are involved in several neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson__s disease, Alzheimer__s disease and polyglutamine diseases like Huntington__s disease we set out our hypothesis of a sensitive ubiquitin equilibrium in the cell in chapter 5. Besides surgery, radiotherapy is one of the most effective ways of anticancer treatment. The main effects of radiotherapy on cells are induction of double-stranded DNA breaks and the formation of reactive radical species, which may lead to protein modifications like amino acid side-chain oxidation and breakage of di-sulphide bonds. These modifications will hopefully lead to DNA and protein damage, sufficient for cells to enter apoptosis or cell arrest. In chapter 6 we have shown that following exposure to g-irradiation, cell surface MHC class I-peptide complex expression is dose dependently upregulated in two phases. In the first phase of upregulation, proteins are degraded and presented that were directly damaged by the radiation and subsequent radical formation. The second phase is caused by a radiation driven activation of the mTOR pathway, which results in enhanced protein synthesis. This leads to the formation of malformed proteins called rapidly degraded proteins (RDPs) or defective ribosomal products (DRiPs) that are subsequently degraded by the proteasome and presented by MHC class I. The second phase does not only quantitatively alter MHC class I expression, but because of the mTOR pathway-specific protein expression also qualitatively. In addition, proteins may be upregulated to g-irradiation especially DNA repair proteins, resulting in more specific peptides. CTLs directed against these radiation-specific peptides were found in peripheral blood, but appeared in an anergic state. The existence of these CTLs and the expression of radiation-specific peptides may explain the inhibition of distant tumours after local radiotherapy if these CTLs could be activated. This effect is known as the abscopal effect of local radiotherapy. If these CTLs could be activated prior to irradiation in a combination therapy, these could induce a potent immune response against the irradiated cells. We show that prior radiation of a local tumour strongly improves the response to immunotherapy (adoptively transferred CTLs), showing the feasibility of a novel combination therapy: radio-immuno therapy. The majority of MHC class I loaded peptides is derived from cytosolic proteins. But it has been shown that MHC class I also presents peptides derived from extracellular sources like bacteria and proteins from neighbouring cells. This phenomenon is called cross-presentation and many pathways have been postulated to explain how proteins from extracellular sources may intersect with the MHC class I loading machinery. Examples are endosome to cytosol relocation, intercellular peptide transport through gap-junctions, exosomes and ER-phagosome fusion. In chapter 3, we have evaluated the evidence for and against the ER-phagosome theory and concluded that cross-presentation via fusion of phagosomes with the ER is very inefficient if at all possible. Our evaluation of the ER-phagosome theory was a commentary on a study by Touret et al, 2005. This study attempted to validate previous results leading to the ER-phagosome fusion theory, but failed to do so. We have also tried to show ER-phagosomal fusion in dendritic cells, but the best near-fusion event of the ER we could find was a close encounter of ribosome containing ER membranes with a mitochondrion. Also our calculations on the odds of presentation of phagosome-derived peptides were not in favour of antigen presentation via ER-phagosome fusion events. We conclude that cross-presentation to support vaccination should find a different route. Show less
