Background: There is a lack of information on mental health outcomes for the increasing older population. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to assess depressive symptoms, loneliness, and... Show moreBackground: There is a lack of information on mental health outcomes for the increasing older population. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to assess depressive symptoms, loneliness, and apathy in older patients with breast cancer within the first 5 years after diagnosis.Methods: Women aged >= 70 years with early-stage breast cancer were included. Multivariate linear mixed models were used to assess longitudinal changes in symptoms of depression (according to the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale), loneliness (according to the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale) and apathy (according to the Starkstein Apathy Scale) over time at 3, 9, 15, 27 and 60 months follow-up.Results: In total, 299 patients were included (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age: 75.8 [5.2] years). At 3 months follow-up, shortly after the acute treatment, 10% of patients had sig-nificant depressive symptoms, while loneliness and apathy were present in 31% and 41% of all patients, respectively. Depression, loneliness and apathy scores showed no clinically relevant changes over time in the whole cohort. Patients who received adjuvant systemic therapies (i.e. endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy (trastuzumab)) had si-milar mental health outcomes as those who did not. However, frail patients had more symptoms (p < 0.001) and were more prone to develop depressive symptoms over time than non-frail patients (p = 0.002).Discussion: Depression, loneliness and apathy were frequently observed in older women with breast cancer and did not change over time. Patients who received adjuvant systemic therapies had similar mental health outcomes as those who did not. However, frail patients were at higher risk to experience these symptoms.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
Introduction: Studies investigating the long-term effects of breast cancer treatment on cognition in older women with breast cancer are lacking, even though preserving cognition is highly valued by... Show moreIntroduction: Studies investigating the long-term effects of breast cancer treatment on cognition in older women with breast cancer are lacking, even though preserving cognition is highly valued by the older population. Specifically, concerns have been raised regarding the detrimental effects of endocrine therapy (ET) on cognition. Therefore, we investigated cogni-tive functioning over time and predictors for cognitive decline in older women treated for early breast cancer.Methods: We prospectively enrolled Dutch women aged >70 years with stage I-III breast can-cer in the observational CLIMB study. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was performed before ET initiation and after 9, 15 and 27 months. Longitudinal MMSE scores were analysed and stratified for ET. Linear mixed models were used to identify possible pre-dictors of cognitive decline.Results: Among the 273 participants, the mean age was 76 years (standard deviation 5), and 48% received ET. The mean baseline MMSE score was 28.2 (standard deviation 1.9). Cogni-tion did not decline to clinically meaningful differences, irrespective of ET. MMSE scores of women with pre-treatment cognitive impairments slightly improved over time (significant interaction terms) in the entire cohort and in women receiving ET. High age, low educational level and impaired mobility were independently associated with declining MMSE scores over time, although the declines were not clinically meaningful.Conclusion: Cognition of older women with early breast cancer did not decline in the first two years after treatment initiation, irrespective of ET. Our findings suggest that the fear of declining cognition does not justify the de-escalation of breast cancer treatment in older women. 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
Purpose: Side effects are the main reason for discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine geriatric predictors of treatment discontinuation... Show morePurpose: Side effects are the main reason for discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine geriatric predictors of treatment discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy within the first 2 years after initiation, and to study the association between early discontinuation and functional status and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Patients aged >= 70 years with stage I-III breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary endpoint was discontinuation of endocrine therapy within 2 years. Risk factors for discontinuation were assessed using univariate logistic regression models. Linear mixed models were used to assess QoL and functional status over time. Results: Overall, 258 patients were included, of whom 36% discontinued therapy within 2 years after initiation. No geriatric predictive factors for treatment discontinuation were found. Tumour stage was inversely associated with early discontinuation. Patients who discontinued had a worse breast cancer-specific QoL (b = - 4.37; 95% CI - 7.96 to - 0.78; p = 0.017) over the first 2 years, in particular on the future perspective subscale (b = - 11.10; 95% CI - 18.80 to - 3.40; p = 0.005), which did not recover after discontinuation. Treatment discontinuation was not associated with functional improvement. Conclusion: A large proportion of older patients discontinue adjuvant endocrine treatment within 2 years after initiation, but geriatric characteristics are not predictive of early discontinuation of treatment. Discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy did not positively affect QoL and functional status, which implies that the observed poorer QoL in this group is probably not caused by adverse effects of endocrine therapy. Show less
Background: Previous studies have shown that survival outcomes for older patients with breast cancer vary substantially across Europe, with worse survival reported in the United Kingdom. It has... Show moreBackground: Previous studies have shown that survival outcomes for older patients with breast cancer vary substantially across Europe, with worse survival reported in the United Kingdom. It has been hypothesised that these differences in survival outcomes could be related to treatment variation. Objectives: We aimed to compare patient and tumour characteristics, treatment selection and survival outcomes between two large prospective cohorts of older patients with operable breast cancer from the United Kingdom (UK) and The Netherlands.Methods: Women diagnosed with operable breast cancer aged >70 years were included. A baseline comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed in both cohorts, with data collected on age, comorbidities, cognition, nutritional and functional status. Baseline tumour characteristics and treatment type were collected. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare overall survival between the cohorts. Results: 3262 patients from the UK Age Gap cohort and 618 patients from the Dutch Climb cohort were included, with median ages of 77.0 (IQR: 72.0-81.0) and 75.0 (IQR: 72.0-81.0) years, respectively. The cohorts were generally comparable, with slight differences in rates of comorbidity and frailty. Median follow-up for overall survival was 4.1 years (IQR 2.9-5.4) in Age Gap and 4.3 years (IQR 2.9-5.5) in Climb. In Age Gap, both the rates of primary endocrine therapy and adjuvant hormonal therapy after surgery were approximately twice those in Climb (16.6% versus 7.3%, p < 0.001 for primary endocrine therapy, and 62.2% versus 38.8%, p < 0.001 for adjuvant hormonal therapy). There was no evidence of a difference in overall survival between the cohorts (adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.17, p Z 0.568). Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, this comparison of two large national prospective longitudinal multi-centre cohort studies demonstrated comparable survival outcomes between older patients with breast cancer treated in the UK and The Netherlands, despite differences in treatment allocation.(C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Show less
BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that survival outcomes for older patients with breast cancer vary substantially across Europe, with worse survival reported in the United Kingdom. It has been... Show moreBackgroundPrevious studies have shown that survival outcomes for older patients with breast cancer vary substantially across Europe, with worse survival reported in the United Kingdom. It has been hypothesised that these differences in survival outcomes could be related to treatment variation.ObjectivesWe aimed to compare patient and tumour characteristics, treatment selection and survival outcomes between two large prospective cohorts of older patients with operable breast cancer from the United Kingdom (UK) and The Netherlands.MethodsWomen diagnosed with operable breast cancer aged ≥70 years were included. A baseline comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed in both cohorts, with data collected on age, comorbidities, cognition, nutritional and functional status. Baseline tumour characteristics and treatment type were collected. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare overall survival between the cohorts.Results3262 patients from the UK Age Gap cohort and 618 patients from the Dutch Climb cohort were included, with median ages of 77.0 (IQR: 72.0–81.0) and 75.0 (IQR: 72.0–81.0) years, respectively. The cohorts were generally comparable, with slight differences in rates of comorbidity and frailty. Median follow-up for overall survival was 4.1 years (IQR 2.9–5.4) in Age Gap and 4.3 years (IQR 2.9–5.5) in Climb. In Age Gap, both the rates of primary endocrine therapy and adjuvant hormonal therapy after surgery were approximately twice those in Climb (16.6% versus 7.3%, p < 0.001 for primary endocrine therapy, and 62.2% versus 38.8%, p < 0.001 for adjuvant hormonal therapy). There was no evidence of a difference in overall survival between the cohorts (adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74–1.17, p = 0.568).ConclusionsIn contrast to previous studies, this comparison of two large national prospective longitudinal multi-centre cohort studies demonstrated comparable survival outcomes between older patients with breast cancer treated in the UK and The Netherlands, despite differences in treatment allocation. Show less
