Background: Treatment monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) relies on imaging to evaluate the tumour burden. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors provide a framework on... Show moreBackground: Treatment monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) relies on imaging to evaluate the tumour burden. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors provide a framework on reporting and interpretation of imaging findings yet offer no guidance on a standardised imaging protocol tailored to patients with mCRC. Imaging protocol hetero-geneity remains a challenge for the reproducibility of conventional imaging end-points and is an obstacle for research on novel imaging end-points. Patients and methods: Acknowledging the recently highlighted potential of radiomics and arti-ficial intelligence tools as decision support for patient care in mCRC, a multidisciplinary, international and expert panel of imaging specialists was formed to find consensus on mCRC imaging protocols using the Delphi method. Results: Under the guidance of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Imaging and Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Groups, the European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), the EORTC-ESOI-ESGAR core imaging protocol was identified. Conclusion: This consensus protocol attempts to promote standardisation and to diminish variations in patient preparation, scan acquisition and scan reconstruction. We anticipate that this standardisation will increase reproducibility of radiomics and artificial intelligence studies and serve as a catalyst for future research on imaging end-points. For ongoing and future mCRC trials, we encourage principal investigators to support the dissemination of these im-aging standards across recruiting centres. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
The aim of this thesis is to determine diagnostic performance of machine learning in differentiating between atypical cartilaginous tumor (ACT) and high-grade chondrosarcoma (CS) based on radiomic... Show moreThe aim of this thesis is to determine diagnostic performance of machine learning in differentiating between atypical cartilaginous tumor (ACT) and high-grade chondrosarcoma (CS) based on radiomic features derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). In chapter 2, the concept of radiomics of musculoskeletal sarcomas is introduced and a systematic review on radiomic feature reproducibility and validation strategies is conducted. In chapter 3, a preliminary study is performed to investigate the performance of MRI radiomics-based machine learning in discriminating ACT from high-grade CS, using a single-center cohort, in comparison with an expert radiologist. In chapter 4, the influence of interobserver segmentation variability on the reproducibility of CT and MRI radiomic features of cartilaginous bone tumors is assessed. In chapter 5, the performance of CT radiomics-based machine learning in discriminating ACT from high-grade CS of long bones is determined and validated using independent data from a multicenter cohort, compared to an expert radiologist. In chapter 6, the performance of MRI radiomics-based machine learning in differentiating between ACT and grade II CS of long bones is determined and validated using independent data from a multicenter cohort, in comparison with an expert radiologist. Finally, in chapter 7, the main results and implications of this thesis are summarized and discussed. Show less
