According to Chiao in his contribution to this book, the desirability of the use of AI in sentencing should be evaluated by comparing computers to the status quo ante, rather than to an unrealistic... Show moreAccording to Chiao in his contribution to this book, the desirability of the use of AI in sentencing should be evaluated by comparing computers to the status quo ante, rather than to an unrealistic, and in any case unrealized, ideal. Although we agree that changes to the legal process such as adopting algorithmic sentencing methods can be beneficial when the change is an incremental improvement over the status quo, in order to assess whether the change is an improvement, we need to know what this “ideal” is toward which improvements are aimed. Therefore, the question whether AI is better at making sentencing decisions than human judges is approached differently in this chapter. We compare human with AI judges by evaluating the extent to which they are able to make a legitimate sentencing decision: Is legitimacy better achieved by machine than by human judges? Show less
Artificial intelligence is increasingly used throughout all processes of the news cycle. AI also has untapped corrective potential. By learning to point readers to diverse, quality, and/or... Show moreArtificial intelligence is increasingly used throughout all processes of the news cycle. AI also has untapped corrective potential. By learning to point readers to diverse, quality, and/or legitimate news after exposure to ‘fake news’, ‘false narratives’, and disinformation, AI plays a powerful role in cleaning up the information ecosystem. Yet AI systems often ‘learn’ from training data that contains historical inaccuracies and biases, with results proven to embed discriminatory attitudes and behaviours. Because this training data often does not contain personal information, regulation of AI in the news production cycle is largely overlooked by legal commentators. Accordingly, this chapter lays out the risks and challenges that AI poses in both journalistic content creation and moderation, especially through machine-learning in the post-truth world. It also assesses the media’s rights and responsibilities for using AI in journalistic endeavours in light of the EU’s AI draft regulation legislative process. Show less
