Studies showing that suspects with a migration background are punished more severely than offenders with a Dutch background receive a lot of attention from the media and politicians. Yet it remains... Show moreStudies showing that suspects with a migration background are punished more severely than offenders with a Dutch background receive a lot of attention from the media and politicians. Yet it remains unclear whether ethnicity causes sentencing disparity. This requires experimental research. In this study, we conduct an experiment in which one half of the participants judged a criminal casefile with a photo of a light-skinned suspect, and the other half a dark-skinned suspect. Data was collected in 2017 and 2021. The data from 2017 show no sentencing disparity, but the 2021-data do show that the dark-skinned offender is punished more severely. Recommendations for future research are made. Show less
During the COVID-19 lockdown courts tried urgent criminal cases by using videoconferencing technology. Communicating via a screen affects what one can see, hear or feel. This article presents the... Show moreDuring the COVID-19 lockdown courts tried urgent criminal cases by using videoconferencing technology. Communicating via a screen affects what one can see, hear or feel. This article presents the findings of three different studies on the experiences with videoconferencing during the lockdown. A survey among lawyers, a survey among detainees and a Twitter search all indicate that the defendant’s right to effective participation was undermined: connectivity problems harmed the right to attend court and confidential communication between the defendant and his lawyer was impossible.Tijdens de COVID-19-lockdown behandelden rechtbanken urgente strafzaken met behulp van videoverbindingen. Communiceren via een beeldscherm heeft invloed op wat men kan zien, horen of voelen. Dit artikel presenteert de bevindingen van drie verschillende onderzoeken naar de ervaringen met videorechtspraak tijdens de lockdown. Een survey onder advocaten, een survey onder gedetineerden en een zoekactie op Twitter wijzen er allemaal op dat het recht van de verdachte op effectieve participatie werd ondermijnd: verbindingsproblemen hebben het aanwezigheidsrecht onder druk gezet en vertrouwelijke communicatie tussen de verdachte en zijn advocaat was onmogelijk.Show less
Zittingen waarbij de verdachte via een videoverbinding door de rechter wordt gehoord hebben in het coronatijdperk een hoge vlucht genomen. Welke lessen kunnen er getrokken worden uit deze... Show moreZittingen waarbij de verdachte via een videoverbinding door de rechter wordt gehoord hebben in het coronatijdperk een hoge vlucht genomen. Welke lessen kunnen er getrokken worden uit deze ervaringen met telehoren en welke principiële bezwaren en praktische obstakels moeten overwonnen worden om het telehoren een structurele plek in de strafrechtspraktijk te geven? Dit zijn urgente vragen in het licht van de aangekondigde voorstellen om telehoren een vaste rol te geven in de strafrechtspleging. Auteurs doen verslag van empirisch onderzoek dat is verricht naar de inzet van digitale middelen ten behoeve van het horen van verdachten en de effecten daarvan op positie van verdachten in het strafproces. De bevindingen nopen tot nadere bezinning. Show less
According to Chiao in his contribution to this book, the desirability of the use of AI in sentencing should be evaluated by comparing computers to the status quo ante, rather than to an unrealistic... Show moreAccording to Chiao in his contribution to this book, the desirability of the use of AI in sentencing should be evaluated by comparing computers to the status quo ante, rather than to an unrealistic, and in any case unrealized, ideal. Although we agree that changes to the legal process such as adopting algorithmic sentencing methods can be beneficial when the change is an incremental improvement over the status quo, in order to assess whether the change is an improvement, we need to know what this “ideal” is toward which improvements are aimed. Therefore, the question whether AI is better at making sentencing decisions than human judges is approached differently in this chapter. We compare human with AI judges by evaluating the extent to which they are able to make a legitimate sentencing decision: Is legitimacy better achieved by machine than by human judges? Show less
Previous research has shown that gruesome evidence influences guilt decisions. Several scholars have put forward that the emotional response to gruesome evidence drives this effect. The current... Show morePrevious research has shown that gruesome evidence influences guilt decisions. Several scholars have put forward that the emotional response to gruesome evidence drives this effect. The current systematic review aims to critically scrutinize the current literature on this underlying emotion mechanism, by reviewing studies on the potential mediating role of emotion. A synthesis of the literature suggests that specific emotions have different effects: disgust shows a mediating effect, fear and sadness do not, whereas the effect of anger is inconsistent. The question remains whether an emotional effect is desirable in the courtroom. Recommendations for future research and the legal practice are made. Show less
