Toxicological information as needed for risk assessments of chemical compounds is often sparse. Unfortunately, gathering new toxicological information experimentally often involves animal testing.... Show moreToxicological information as needed for risk assessments of chemical compounds is often sparse. Unfortunately, gathering new toxicological information experimentally often involves animal testing. Simulated alternatives, e.g., quantitative structure – activity relationship (QSAR) models, are preferred to infer the toxicity of new compounds. Aquatic toxicity data collections consist of many related tasks, each predicting the toxicity of new compounds on a given species. Since many of these tasks are inherently low-resource, i.e., involve few associated compounds, this is challenging. Meta-learning is a subfield of artificial intelligence that can lead to more accurate models by enabling the utilization of information across tasks. In our work, we benchmark various state-of-the-art meta-learning techniques for building QSAR models, focusing on knowledge sharing between species. Specifically, we employ and compare transformational machine learning, model-agnostic meta-learning, fine-tuning, and multi-task models. Our experiments show that established knowledge-sharing techniques outperform single-task approaches. We recommend the use of multi task random forest models for aquatic toxicity modeling, which matched or exceeded the performance of other approaches and robustly produced good results in the low-resource settings we studied. This model functions on a species level, predicting toxicity for multiple species across various phyla, with flexible exposure duration and on a large chemical applicability domain. Show less
König, H.M.T.; Bosman, A.W.; Hoos, H.H.; Rijn, J.N. van 2023
As restricted quantum computers are slowly becoming a reality, the search for meaningful first applications intensifies. In this domain, one of the more investigated approaches is the use of a... Show moreAs restricted quantum computers are slowly becoming a reality, the search for meaningful first applications intensifies. In this domain, one of the more investigated approaches is the use of a special type of quantum circuit – a so-called quantum neural network – to serve as a basis for a machine learning model. Roughly speaking, as the name suggests, a quantum neural network can play a similar role to a neural network. However, specifically for applications in machine learning contexts, very little is known about suitable circuit architectures, or model hyperparameters one should use to achieve good learning performance. In this work, we apply the functional ANOVA framework to quantum neural networks to analyze which of the hyperparameters were most influential for their predictive performance. We analyze one of the most typically used quantum neural network architectures. We then apply this to 7 open-source datasets from the OpenML-CC18 classification benchmark whose number of features is small enough to fit on quantum hardware with less than 20 qubits. Three main levels of importance were detected from the ranking of hyperparameters obtained with functional ANOVA. Our experiment both confirmed expected patterns and revealed new insights. For instance, setting well the learning rate is deemed the most critical hyperparameter in terms of marginal contribution on all datasets, whereas the particular choice of entangling gates used is considered the least important except on one dataset. This work introduces new methodologies to study quantum machine learning models and provides new insights toward quantum model selection. Show less
Salinas, N.R.P.; Baratchi, M.; Rijn, J.N. van; Vollrath, A. 2021
Deep neural networks can achieve great successes when presented with large data sets and sufficient computational resources. However, their ability to learn new concepts quickly is limited. Meta... Show moreDeep neural networks can achieve great successes when presented with large data sets and sufficient computational resources. However, their ability to learn new concepts quickly is limited. Meta-learning is one approach to address this issue, by enabling the network to learn how to learn. The field of Deep Meta-Learning advances at great speed, but lacks a unified, in-depth overview of current techniques. With this work, we aim to bridge this gap. After providing the reader with a theoretical foundation, we investigate and summarize key methods, which are categorized into (i) metric-, (ii) model-, and (iii) optimization-based techniques. In addition, we identify the main open challenges, such as performance evaluations on heterogeneous benchmarks, and reduction of the computational costs of meta-learning. Show less
The goal of quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) learning is to learn a function that, given the structure of a small molecule (a potential drug), outputs the predicted activity of... Show moreThe goal of quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) learning is to learn a function that, given the structure of a small molecule (a potential drug), outputs the predicted activity of the compound. We employed multi-task learning (MTL) to exploit commonalities in drug targets and assays. We used datasets containing curated records about the activity of specific compounds on drug targets provided by ChEMBL. Totally, 1091 assays have been analysed. As a baseline, a single task learning approach that trains random forest to predict drug activity for each drug target individually was considered. We then carried out feature-based and instance-based MTL to predict drug activities. We introduced a natural metric of evolutionary distance between drug targets as a measure of tasks relatedness. Instance-based MTL significantly outperformed both, feature-based MTL and the base learner, on 741 drug targets out of 1091. Feature-based MTL won on 179 occasions and the base learner performed best on 171 drug targets. We conclude that MTL QSAR is improved by incorporating the evolutionary distance between targets. These results indicate that QSAR learning can be performed effectively, even if little data is available for specific drug targets, by leveraging what is known about similar drug targets. Show less
The algorithm selection problem is to choose the most suitable algorithm for solving a given problem instance. It leverages the complementarity between different approaches that is present in many... Show moreThe algorithm selection problem is to choose the most suitable algorithm for solving a given problem instance. It leverages the complementarity between different approaches that is present in many areas of AI. We report on the state of the art in algorithm selection, as defined by the Algorithm Selection competitions in 2015 and 2017. The results of these competitions show how the state of the art improved over the years. We show that although performance in some cases is very good, there is still room for improvement in other cases. Finally, we provide insights into why some scenarios are hard, and pose challenges to the community on how to advance the current state of the art. Show less
Rijn, J.N. van; Holmes, G.; Pfahringer, B.; Vanschoren, J. 2018
Algorithm selection methods can be speeded-up substantially by incorporating multi-objective measures that give preference to algorithms that are both promising and fast to evaluate. In this paper,... Show moreAlgorithm selection methods can be speeded-up substantially by incorporating multi-objective measures that give preference to algorithms that are both promising and fast to evaluate. In this paper, we introduce such a measure, A3R, and incorporate it into two algorithm selection techniques: average ranking and active testing. Average ranking combines algorithm rankings observed on prior datasets to identify the best algorithms for a new dataset. The aim of the second method is to iteratively select algorithms to be tested on the new dataset, learning from each new evaluation to intelligently select the next best candidate. We show how both methods can be upgraded to incorporate a multi-objective measure A3R that combines accuracy and runtime. It is necessary to establish the correct balance between accuracy and runtime, as otherwise time will be wasted by conducting less informative tests. The correct balance can be set by an appropriate parameter setting within function A3R that trades off accuracy and runtime. Our results demonstrate that the upgraded versions of Average Ranking and Active Testing lead to much better mean interval loss values than their accuracy-based counterparts. Show less
