In an informal way, some dilemmas in connection with hypothesis testing in contingency tables are discussed. The body of the article concerns the numerical evaluation of Cochran's Rule about the... Show moreIn an informal way, some dilemmas in connection with hypothesis testing in contingency tables are discussed. The body of the article concerns the numerical evaluation of Cochran's Rule about the minimum expected value in r × c contingency tables with fixed margins when testing independence with Pearson's X2 statistic using the χ2 distribution. Show less
Three-mode analysis is a generalization of principal component analysis to three-mode data. While two-mode data consist of cases that are measured on several variables, three-mode data consist of... Show moreThree-mode analysis is a generalization of principal component analysis to three-mode data. While two-mode data consist of cases that are measured on several variables, three-mode data consist of cases that are measured on several variables at several occasions. As any other statistical technique, the results of three-mode analysis may be influenced by missing data. Three-mode software packages generally use the expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm for dealing with missing data. However, there are situations in which the EM algorithm is expected to break down. Alternatively, multiple imputation may be used for dealing with missing data. In this study we investigated the influence of eight different multiple-imputation methods on the results of three-mode analysis, more specifically, a Tucker2 analysis, and compared the results with those of the EM algorithm. Results of the simulations show that multilevel imputation with the mode with the most levels nested within cases and the mode with the least levels represented as variables gives the best results for a Tucker2 analysis. Thus, this may be a good alternative for the EM algorithm in handling missing data in a Tucker2 analysis. Show less
Assessing the factorial invariance of two-way rating designs such as ratings of concepts on several scales by different groups can be carried out with three-way models such as the Parafac and... Show moreAssessing the factorial invariance of two-way rating designs such as ratings of concepts on several scales by different groups can be carried out with three-way models such as the Parafac and Tucker models. By their definitions these models are double-metric factorially invariant. The differences between these models lie in their handling of the links between the concept and scale spaces. These links may consist of unrestricted linking (Tucker2 model), invariant component covariances but variable variances per group and per component (Parafac model), zero covariances and variances different per group but not per component (Replicated Tucker3 model) and strict invariance (Component analysis on the average matrix). This hierarchy of invariant models, and the procedures by which to evaluate the models against each other, is illustrated in some detail with an international data set from attachment theory. Show less
Rijn, S. van; Kroonenberg, P.M.; Ziermans, T.B.; Swaab, J.T. 2015
