The average person spends more than one-third of their life working. Considering that work plays a central role in our lives, many of us are concerned about choosing career paths that are... Show moreThe average person spends more than one-third of their life working. Considering that work plays a central role in our lives, many of us are concerned about choosing career paths that are sustainable. However, as much as we want to, we cannot craft sustainable careers by simply making the right career decisions. Our careers are continuously affected by less controllable aspects in our lives, such as societal changes and the organization we work for. To understand what makes careers sustainable, we need to investigate how the person together with other contextual stakeholders can influence sustainable careers. This dissertation consists of four empirical chapters that study the consequences of a number of contemporary career choices made by the individual, such as working from home and becoming self-employed, and the influence of supervisors and society on sustainable careers. Additionally, this thesis sheds light on the challenges that certain minority group members face in building a sustainable career. The findings demonstrate that contemporary work forms, such as working from home, have the potential to promote sustainable careers but only if supervisors support individuals’ decisions. Moreover, this dissertation shows that women and non-parents may face greater challenges in crafting a sustainable career. Show less
Purpose – Recent evidence from glass cliff research suggests that women are more willing than men to accept risky leadership positions. The purpose of this paper (based on three studies) is to... Show morePurpose – Recent evidence from glass cliff research suggests that women are more willing than men to accept risky leadership positions. The purpose of this paper (based on three studies) is to reveal and resolve the apparent paradox that women are more risk averse than men yet end up in risky leadership positions. Design/methodology/approach – In Study I, risk attitudes of 125 participants were surveyed to understand gender differences in risk taking. In two experimental vignette studies, 119 university students (Study II) and 109 working adults (Study III) were offered a leadership position in either a risky or successful company and asked to rate their willingness to accept the job.Findings – Together, the results showed that although women are generally more risk averse than men, women who scored low on career self-efficacy were more likely to perceive a risky job as a promotional opportunity and were therefore more willing to accept such a job. These findings shed light on the role of women’s career decision making in the glass cliff phenomenon.Originality/value – Glass cliff research has focused almost exclusively on organizational decision makers. The authors aim to better understand the glass cliff phenomenon by incorporating the perspective of job seekers. Show less
