Purpose Radical resection is paramount for curative oncological surgery. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) aids in intraoperative identification of tumor-positive resection margins. This study aims... Show morePurpose Radical resection is paramount for curative oncological surgery. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) aids in intraoperative identification of tumor-positive resection margins. This study aims to assess the feasibility of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) targeting antibody fragments for FGS in a direct comparison with their parent IgG in various relevant in vivo models. Procedures Humanized anti-uPAR monoclonal antibody MNPR-101 (uIgG) was proteolytically digested into F(ab')2 and Fab fragments named uFab2 and uFab. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and cell assays were used to determine in vitro binding before and after fluorescent labeling with IRDye800CW. Mice bearing subcutaneous HT-29 human colonic cancer cells were imaged serially for up to 120 h after fluorescent tracer administration. Imaging characteristics and ex vivo organ biodistribution were further compared in orthotopic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BxPc-3-luc2), head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (OSC-19-luc2-GFP), and peritoneal carcinomatosis (HT29-luc2) models using the clinical Artemis fluorescence imaging system. Results Unconjugated and conjugated uIgG, uFab2, and uFab specifically recognized uPAR in the nanomolar range as determined by SPR and cell assays. Subcutaneous tumors were clearly identifiable with tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) > 2 after 72 h for uIgG-800F and 24 h for uFab2-800F and uFab-800F. For the latter two, mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) dipped below predetermined threshold after 72 h and 36 h, respectively. Tumors were easily identified in the orthotopic models with uIgG-800F consistently having the highest MFIs and uFab2-800F and uFab-800F having similar values. In biodistribution studies, kidney and liver fluorescence approached tumor fluorescence after uIgG-800F administration and surpassed tumor fluorescence after uFab2-800F or uFab-800F administration, resulting in interference in the abdominal orthotopic mouse models. Conclusions In a side-by-side comparison, FGS with uPAR-targeting antibody fragments compared with the parent IgG resulted in earlier tumor visualization at the expense of peak fluorescence intensity. Show less
Linders, D.; Deken, M.; Valk, M. van der; Tummers, W.; Bhairosingh, S.; Schaap, D.; ... ; Hilling, D. 2021
Rectal cancer patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy can be monitored with a watch-and-wait strategy. However, regrowth rates indicate that identification of patients with a... Show moreRectal cancer patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy can be monitored with a watch-and-wait strategy. However, regrowth rates indicate that identification of patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) remains challenging. Targeted near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy is a potential tool to improve response evaluation. Promising tumor targets include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), integrin alpha v beta 6, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). To investigate the applicability of these targets, we analyzed protein expression by immunohistochemistry and quantified these by a total immunostaining score (TIS) in tissue of rectal cancer patients with a pCR. CEA, EpCAM, alpha v beta 6, and uPAR expression in the diagnostic biopsy was high (TIS > 6) in, respectively, 100%, 100%, 33%, and 46% of cases. CEA and EpCAM expressions were significantly higher in the diagnostic biopsy compared with the corresponding tumor bed (p < 0.01). CEA, EpCAM, alpha v beta 6, and uPAR expressions were low (TIS < 6) in the tumor bed in, respectively, 93%, 95%, 85%, and 62.5% of cases. Immunohistochemical evaluation shows that CEA and EpCAM could be suitable targets for response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment, since expression of these targets in the primary tumor bed is low compared with the diagnostic biopsy and adjacent pre-existent rectal mucosa in more than 90% of patients with a pCR. Show less
Te studies described in this thesis focus on the role of GDE2 and GDE3 on GPI-anchor hydrolysis to increase our understanding of their physiological functions. Chapter 1 is a general introduction... Show moreTe studies described in this thesis focus on the role of GDE2 and GDE3 on GPI-anchor hydrolysis to increase our understanding of their physiological functions. Chapter 1 is a general introduction giving an overview of the current knowledge and progress in GPI-anchored bio-synthesis and signaling, together with an overview of the developing understanding of the mammalian GDPD protein family. Chapter 2 identifies GDE3 as the first mammalian GPI-specific PLC that selectively cleaves and releases the urokinase receptor (uPAR) from the membrane. By doing so, GDE3 negatively regulates uPAR signaling in breast cancer cells. Its closest family member, GDE2, associates with a positive clinical outcome in neuroblastoma, a childhood disease characterized by defective neuronal differentiation. The molecular mechanism involving neuronal differentiation through selective release of Glypican 6 by GDE2 is presented in Chapter 3. Addendum Chapter 3 comments on the release of GPI-anchored proteins during neuronal differentiation. Next, Chapter 4 explores the involvement of GDE2 in zebrafish development and describes a potential role for GDE2 in the development of the pancreas. Chapter 5 compares the enzymatic activity towards specifc GPI-anchored proteins and localization of GDE2 and GDE3. In Chapter 6, the results presented in this thesis are summarized and discussed. Show less
