Objectives: To systematically review the literature on the utilization and effectiveness of electronic-health technologies (eHealth), such as smartphone applications, in managing patients with... Show moreObjectives: To systematically review the literature on the utilization and effectiveness of electronic-health technologies (eHealth), such as smartphone applications, in managing patients with celiac disease (CD). Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were all searched (until February 2021). Inclusion criteria were full-text English articles reporting original data on the use of eHealth technologies in the follow-up of CD patients, with no age restriction. Exclusion criteria were studies only using non-interactive websites and phone consultation as the primary eHealth method. The results were summarized narratively. Results: Using identified keywords, 926 unique studies were identified. After title and abstract screening by two independent reviewers, 26 studies were reviewed in full text. Finally, eight studies were included in this systematic review, and their quality appraised using standardized forms. Of the eight studies, six were randomized-controlled trials, one mixed-methods study, and one cross-sectional, observational study. Studies were assessed to be of "low" to "moderate" methodological quality. Studied eHealth technologies included web-based interventions, smartphone applications, text messaging, and online consultations. The most consistently reported effects related to improved quality of life (number of studies = 4), knowledge on CD (n = 3), and dietary adherence (n = 2); notably, only one study reported reduced costs of eHealth vs. standard (in-office) care. Conclusions: Although eHealth has the potential to improve the management of CD, so far, the research in the field is scarce and generally of low-moderate methodological quality. Hence, the effectiveness of eHealth in CD management remains uncertain, and more high-quality evidence is required before its utility is known. Show less
Boom, V.E.A.; Kamp, L.T. van der; Zuilen, A.D. van; Ranitz, W.L. de; Bos, W.J.; Jellema, W.T.; ... ; Kaasjager, K. 2020
Introduction eConsultation in nephrology is an innovative way for general practitioners (GPs) to consult a nephrologist. Studies have shown that questions from GPs can be answered and intended... Show moreIntroduction eConsultation in nephrology is an innovative way for general practitioners (GPs) to consult a nephrologist. Studies have shown that questions from GPs can be answered and intended referrals can be avoided by eConsultation. However, follow-up data are lacking. The primary aim of this study was therefore to assess whether patients for whom a referral to the outpatient clinic of a medical specialist was avoided in the short term were not then referred for the same problem within one year after the eConsultation. Methods All eConsultations sent between June 2017 and April 2018 to seven nephrologists in three different hospitals in The Netherlands were included. Exclusion criteria were duplications and missing data on follow-up. Data were obtained from the eConsultation application forms and from GP medical records. Results A total of 173 eConsultations were included. Of the 32 patients for whom a referral was initially prevented, 91% (95% confidence interval 75-98) had not been referred to a specialist for the same problem within one year after the eConsultation. Discussion eConsultation in the field of nephrology can prevent referrals in the long term. It can therefore contribute to a more modern and efficient health-care system in which chronic care is provided by GPs in close proximity to patients, while specialist support is easily available and accessible through eConsultation when necessary. Show less
Speyer, R.; Denman, D.; Wilkes-Gillan, S.; Chen, Y.W.; Bogaardt, H.; Kim, J.H.; ... ; Cordier, R. 2018
Objective: To describe telehealth interventions delivered by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas, and to compare the effects of telehealth interventions with standard... Show moreObjective: To describe telehealth interventions delivered by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas, and to compare the effects of telehealth interventions with standard face-to-face interventions.Data sources: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched. The content of relevant journals and published articles were also searched.Study selection: Studies examining the effectiveness of allied health and nursing telehealth interventions for rural and remote populations were included in descriptive analyses. Studies comparing telehealth intervention with standard face-to-face interventions grouped by type of intervention approach were used to examine between-groups effect sizes.Data extraction: Methodological quality of studies was rated using the QualSyst critical appraisal tool and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Evidence Hierarchy levels.Data synthesis: After quality ratings, 43 studies were included. A majority of studies had strong methodological quality. The disciplines of psychology and nursing were represented most frequently, as were studies using a cognitive intervention approach. Meta-analysis results slightly favoured telehealth interventions compared with face-to-face interventions, but did not show significant differences. Interventions using a combined physical and cognitive approach appeared to be more effective.Conclusion: Telehealth services may be as effective as face-to-face interventions, which is encouraging given the potential benefits of telehealth in rural and remote areas with regards to healthcare access and time and cost savings. Show less
