Cerebral vascular reactivity quantified using blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI in conjuncture with a visual stimulus has been proven to be a potent and early marker for cerebral amyloid... Show moreCerebral vascular reactivity quantified using blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI in conjuncture with a visual stimulus has been proven to be a potent and early marker for cerebral amyloid angiopathy. This work investigates the influence of different postprocessing methods on the outcome of such vascular reactivity measurements. Three methods for defining the region of interest (ROI) over which the reactivity is measured are investigated: structural (transformed V1), functional (template based on the activation of a subset of subjects), and percentile (11.5 cm(3) most responding voxels). Evaluation is performed both in a test-retest experiment in healthy volunteers (N = 12), as well as in 27 Dutch-type cerebral amyloid angiopathy patients and 33 age- and sex-matched control subjects. The results show that the three methods select a different subset of voxels, although all three lead to similar outcome measures in healthy subjects. However, in (severe) pathology, the percentile method leads to higher reactivity measures than the other two, due to circular analysis or "double dipping" by defining a subject-specific ROI based on the strongest responses within each subject. Furthermore, while different voxels are included in the presence of lesions, this does not necessarily result in different outcome measures. In conclusion, to avoid bias created by the method, either a structural or a functional method is recommended. Both of these methods provide similar reactivity measures, although the functional ROI appears to be less reproducible between studies, because slightly different subsets of voxels were found to be included. On the other hand, the functional method did include fewer lesion voxels than the structural method. Show less
Background: Particle tracing based on 4D Flow MRI has been applied as a quantitative and qualitative postprocessing technique to study temporally evolving blood flow patterns. Purpose: To... Show moreBackground: Particle tracing based on 4D Flow MRI has been applied as a quantitative and qualitative postprocessing technique to study temporally evolving blood flow patterns. Purpose: To systematically review the various methods to perform 4D Flow MRI-based particle tracing, as well as the clinical value, clinical applications, and current developments of the technique. Study type: The study type is systematic review. Subjects: Patients with cardiovascular disease (such as Marfan, Fontan, Tetralogy of Fallot), healthy controls, and cardiovascular phantoms that received 4D Flow MRI with particle tracing. Field Strength/Sequence: Three-dimensional three-directional cine phase-contrast MRI, at 1.5 T and 3 T. Assessment: Two systematic searches were performed on the PubMed database using Boolean operators and the relevant key terms covering 4D Flow MRI and particle tracing. One systematic search was focused on particle tracing methods, whereas the other on applications. Additional articles from other sources were sought out and included after a similar inspection. Particle tracing methods, clinical applications, clinical value, and current developments were extracted. Statistical Tests: The main results of the included studies are summarized, without additional statistical analysis. Results: Of 127 unique articles retrieved from the initial search, 56 were included (28 for methods and 54 for applications). Most articles that described particle tracing methods used an adaptive timestep, a fourth order Runge-Kutta integration method, and linear interpolation in the time dimension. Particle tracing was applied in heart chambers, aorta, venae cavae, Fontan circulation, pulmonary arteries, abdominal vasculature, peripheral arteries, carotid arteries, and cerebral vasculature. Applications were grouped as intravascular, intracardiac, flow stasis, and research. Data Conclusions: Particle tracing based on 4D Flow MRI gives unique insight into blood flow in several cardiovascular diseases, but the quality depends heavily on the MRI data quality. Further studies are required to evaluate the clinical value of the technique for different cardiovascular diseases. Evidence Level: 5. Technical Efficacy: Stage 1. Show less
