Background: In dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), outcome after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is modest, compared with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Pleomorphic VT (PL-VT) has been... Show moreBackground: In dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), outcome after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is modest, compared with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Pleomorphic VT (PL-VT) has been associated with fibrotic remodeling and end-stage heart failure in IHD. The prognostic role of PL-VT in DCM is unknown. Methods: Consecutive IHD (2009-2016) or DCM (2008-2018) patients undergoing ablation for monomorphic VT were included. PL-VT was defined as >= 1 spontaneous change of the 12-lead VT-morphology during the same induced VT episode. Patients were followed for VT recurrence and mortality. Results: A total of 247 patients (86% men; 6313 years; IHD n=152; DCM n=95) underwent ablation for monomorphic VT. PL-VT was observed in 22 and 29 patients with IHD and DCM, respectively (14% versus 31%, P=0.003). In IHD, PL-VT was associated with lower LVEF (28 +/- 9% versus 34 +/- 12%, P=0.02) and only observed in those with LVEF<40%. In contrast, in DCM, PL-VT was not related to LVEF and induced in 27% of patients with LVEF>40%. During a median follow-up of 30 months, 79 (32%) patients died (IHD 48; DCM 31; P=0.88) and 120 (49%) had VT recurrence (IHD 59; DCM 61; P<0.001). PL-VT was associated with mortality in IHD but not in DCM. In IHD, VT recurrence was independently associated with LVEF, number of induced VTs, and procedural noncomplete success. Of note, in DCM, PL-VT (HR, 2.62 [95% CI, 1.47-4.69]), pathogenic mutation (HR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.16-3.91]), and anteroseptal VT substrate (HR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.00-3.07]) independently predicted VT recurrence. Conclusions: In IHD, PL-VT was associated with low LVEF and mortality. In DCM, PL-VT was not associated with mortality but a predictor of VT recurrence independent from LVEF. PL-VT in DCM may indicate a specific arrhythmic substrate difficult to control by current ablation techniques. Show less
BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease has not been previously studied. & nbsp; OBJECTIVES: The... Show moreBACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease has not been previously studied. & nbsp; OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of LVEF in BAV patients according to the type of aortic valve dysfunction. & nbsp; METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data collected in 2,672 patients included in an international registry of patients with BAV. Patients were classified according to the type of aortic valve dysfunction: isolated aortic stenosis (AS) (n = 749), isolated aortic regurgitation (AR) (n = 554), mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) (n = 190), or no significant aortic valve dysfunction (n =1,179; excluded from this analysis). The study population was divided according to LVEF strata to investigate its impact on clinical outcomes. & nbsp; RESULTS: The risk of all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of aortic valve replacement or repair (AVR) and all-cause mortality increased when LVEF was < 60% in the whole cohort as well as in the AS and AR groups, and when LVEF was < 55% in MAVD group. In multivariable analysis, LVEF strata were significantly associated with increased rate of mortality (LVEF 50%-59%: HR: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.09-3.07]; P = 0.022; LVEF 30%-49%: HR: 1.97 [95% CI: 1.13-3.41]; P = 0.016; LVEF < 30%: HR: 4.20 [95% CI: 2.01-8.75]; P < 0.001; vs LVEF 60%-70%, reference group). & nbsp; CONCLUSIONS: In BAV patients, the risk of adverse clinical outcomes increases significantly when the LVEF is < 60%. These findings suggest that LVEF cutoff values proposed in the guidelines to indicate intervention should be raised from 50% to 60% in AS or AR and 55% in MAVD. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;80:1071 & ndash;1084) (c) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Show less
Simple Summary: Radiotherapeutic treatment in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) survivors contributes to long-term survival but is associated with lifetime increased risk of cardiovascular events.... Show moreSimple Summary: Radiotherapeutic treatment in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) survivors contributes to long-term survival but is associated with lifetime increased risk of cardiovascular events. Echocardiographic screening for left ventricular (LV) dysfunction usually assesses left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) can detect early subclinical LV dysfunction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of conventional echocardiographic parameters and GLS in relation to cardiovascular events in CHL survivors treated with thoracic radiotherapy. Impaired GLS was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. In addition, conventional echocardiographic parameters, including LVEF and diastolic dysfunction also showed a significant association with cardiovascular events and cardiac death. Assessing LV strain by echocardiography can contribute to early detection of subclinical LV dysfunction and identifying CHL patients at increased risk for cardiovascular events. Background: Treatment with thoracic irradiation for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) leads to improved survival but also increases the risk of cardiovascular events. Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is usually assessed by echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), whereas global longitudinal strain (GLS) can detect early subclinical LV dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if conventional echocardiographic parameters and GLS are associated with cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up. Methods: 161 consecutive CHL patients treated with radiotherapy who underwent echocardiography > 10 years after diagnosis were assessed for eligibility. Multivariable cause-specific Cox regression was performed for a composite outcome of cardiac death and cardiovascular events and the competing outcome of noncardiac death. Results: 129 patients (61.2% female, N = 79) with a mean age of 46.3 +/- 11.0 years at index visit were eligible for analysis. GLS was impaired in 51 patients (39.5%) and 10.9% had a LVEF of< 50%. The median E/e' was 9.2 [7.2;12.7]. Adjusted for confounders, GLS > -16% showed a significant association with a near four-fold risk of the composite endpoint (HR = 3.95, 95% CI: 1.83-8.52, p < 0.001). LVEF < 50% (HR = 2.99, p = 0.016) and E/e' (HR = 1.16, p < 0.001) also showed a significant relationship with the outcome. None of the aforementioned parameters were associated with the competing outcome. Conclusions: This study shows that LV dysfunction including impaired GLS in CHL survivors is associated with cardiovascular events and cardiac death. Show less
Gebhard, C.; Maredziak, M.; Messerli, M.; Buechel, R.R.; Lin, F.; Gransar, H.; ... ; Kaufmann, P.A. 2020
Aims There are significant sex-specific differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), with a higher LVEF being observed in women. We sought to assess the clinical relevance of an... Show moreAims There are significant sex-specific differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), with a higher LVEF being observed in women. We sought to assess the clinical relevance of an increased LVEF in women and men.Methods and results A total of 4632 patients from the CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter) registry (44.8% women; mean age 58.7 +/- 13.2 years in men and 59.5 +/- 13.3 years in women, P = 0.05), in whom LVEF was measured by cardiac computed tomography, were categorized according to LVEF (low <55%, normal 55-65%, and high >65%). The prevalence of high LVEF was similar in both sexes (33.5% in women and 32.5% in men, P = 0.46). After 6 years of follow-up, no difference in mortality was observed in patients with high LVEF in the overall cohort (P = 0.41). When data were stratified by sex, women with high LVEF died more often from any cause as compared to women with normal LVEF (8.6% vs. 7.1%, log rank P = 0.032), while an opposite trend was observed in men (5.8% vs. 6.8% in normal LVEF, log rank P = 0.89). Accordingly, a first order interaction term of male sex and high LVEF was significant (hazard ratios 0.63, 95% confidence intervals 0.41-0.98, P = 0.043) in a Cox regression model of all-cause mortality adjusted for age, cardiovascular risk factors, and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).Conclusion Increased LVEF is highly prevalent in patients referred for evaluation of CAD and is associated with an increased risk of death in women, but not in men. Differentiating between normal and hyperdynamic left ventricles might improve risk stratification in women with CAD. Show less
