Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of the infliximab biosimilar (sim-INF) CT-P13 with originator infliximab (orig-INF) over 24 months of follow-up in biological-naïve patients with rheumatoid... Show moreObjectives: To compare the effectiveness of the infliximab biosimilar (sim-INF) CT-P13 with originator infliximab (orig-INF) over 24 months of follow-up in biological-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods: Biological-naïve patients from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt), with a clinical diagnosis of RA or axSpA, who were starting either the sim-INF CT-P13 or the orig-INF after 2014 (date of market entry of CT-P13 in Portugal), were included. Patients on biosimilar and originator were compared regarding different response outcomes at 3 and 6 months, adjusting for age, sex and baseline C Reactive Protein (CRP). The main outcome was the change in DAS28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) for RA and the ASDAS-CRP for axSpA. Additionally, the effect of sim-INF vs orig-INF on different response outcomes over 24 months of follow-up was tested with longitudinal generalized estimating equations (GEE) models. Results: In total, 140 patients were included, 66 (47%) of which with RA. The distribution of patients starting the sim-INF and the orig-INF was the same between the two diseases (approximately 60% and 40%, respectively). From the 66 patients with RA, 82% were females, mean age was 56 (SD 11) years and mean DAS28-ESR 4.9 (1.3) at baseline. As for the patients with axSpA, 53% were males, mean age was 46 (13.0) years and mean ASDAS-CRP 3.7 (0.9) at baseline. There were no differences in efficacy between RA patients treated with the sim-INF and the orig-INF, either at 3 months (∆DAS28-ESR: -0.6 (95% CI -1.3; 0.1) vs -1.2 (-2.0; -0.4)), or at 6 months (∆DAS28-ESR: -0.7 (-1.5; 0.0) vs -1.5 (-2.4; -0.7)). This was also true for patients with axSpA (∆ASDAS at 3 months: -1.6 (-2.0; -1.1) vs -1.4 (-1.8; -0.9) and at 6 months: -1.5 (-2.0; -1.1) vs -1.1 (-1.5; -0.7)). Results were similar with the longitudinal models over 24 months. Conclusion: There are no differences in effectiveness between the sim-INF CT-P13 and the orig-INF in the treatment of biological-naïve patients with active RA and axSpA in clinical practice. Show less
Pierik, M.J.; Meulen, A.E. van der; Linde, K. van der; Lutgens, M.; Kuijvenhoven, J.P.; Akol, H.; ... ; Dijkstra, G. 2022
Lay Summary Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were switched from the originator infliximab to the biosimilar CT-P13. Before and after switching they filled in questionnaires. The study... Show moreLay Summary Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were switched from the originator infliximab to the biosimilar CT-P13. Before and after switching they filled in questionnaires. The study showed that switching did not reduce the quality of life and efficacy of the treatment.Background Quality of life (QoL) data for patients with inflammatory bowel disease switched from the reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 is lacking. This study aims to demonstrate noninferiority for QoL and efficacy after switching. Methods OoL and clinical efficacy were measured prior to and after 2, 4, and 6 CT-P13 infusions. Results One hundred seventy-eight patients were included. Noninferiority was established for QoL [ratio 97.95% (95% confidence interval 95.93 to 100.01)] and efficacy [difference -0.02 (95% confidence interval -0.68 to 0.64)]. Five patients reported 6 nonrelated, serious adverse events. Conclusions Switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 did not affect the QoL or disease activity and was well tolerated. Show less
Pierik, M.J.; Meulen, A.E. van der; Linde, K. van der; Lutgens, M.; Kuijvenhoven, J.P.; Akol, H.; ... ; Dijkstra, G. 2022
BackgroundQuality of life (QoL) data for patients with inflammatory bowel disease switched from the reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 is lacking. This study aims to demonstrate... Show moreBackgroundQuality of life (QoL) data for patients with inflammatory bowel disease switched from the reference infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 is lacking. This study aims to demonstrate noninferiority for QoL and efficacy after switching.MethodsOoL and clinical efficacy were measured prior to and after 2, 4, and 6 CT-P13 infusions.ResultsOne hundred seventy-eight patients were included. Noninferiority was established for QoL [ratio 97.95% (95% confidence interval 95.93 to 100.01)] and efficacy [difference −0.02 (95% confidence interval −0.68 to 0.64)]. Five patients reported 6 nonrelated, serious adverse events.ConclusionsSwitching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 did not affect the QoL or disease activity and was well tolerated. Show less
Background: Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and treated with originator infliximab are increasingly being switched to biosimilars. Some patients, however, are "reverse... Show moreBackground: Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and treated with originator infliximab are increasingly being switched to biosimilars. Some patients, however, are "reverse switched" to treatment with the originator. Here we assess the prevalence of reverse switching, including its indication and outcomes.Methods: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, data on patients with IBD from 9 hospitals in the Netherlands were collected. All adult patients with IBD were included if they previously had been switched from originator infliximab to the biosimilar CT-P13 and had a follow-up time of at least 52 weeks after the initial switch. The reasons for reverse switching were categorized into worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, adverse effects, or loss of response to CT-P13. Drug persistence was analyzed through survival analyses.Results: A total of 758 patients with IBD were identified. Reverse switching was observed in 75 patients (9.9%). Patients with reverse switching were predominantly female (70.7%). Gastrointestinal symptoms (25.5%) and dermatological symptoms (21.8%) were the most commonly reported reasons for reverse switching. In 9 patients (12.0%), loss of response to CT-P13 was the reason for reverse switching. Improvement of reported symptoms was seen in 73.3% of patients after reverse switching and 7 out of 9 patients (77.8%) with loss of response regained response. Infliximab persistence was equal between patients who were reverse-switched and those who were maintained on CT-P13.Conclusions: Reverse switching occurred in 9.9% of patients, predominantly for biosimilar-attributed adverse effects. Switching back to originator infliximab seems effective in patients who experience adverse effects, worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, or loss of response after switching from originator infliximab to CT-P13. Show less
Cozijnsen, M.; Duif, V.; Kokke, F.; Kindermann, A.; Rheenen, P. van; Meij, T. de; ... ; Dutch PIBD Working Grp Kids Crohn 2015
