OBJECTIVES: To combine evidence on andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrates for factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding to guide clinicians on reversal strategies. DATA SOURCES: Embase,... Show moreOBJECTIVES: To combine evidence on andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrates for factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding to guide clinicians on reversal strategies. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: Observational studies and randomized clinical trials studying hemostatic effectiveness of andexanet alfa or prothrombin complex concentrate for acute reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated hemorrhage. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted the data from the studies. Visualization and comparison of hemostatic effectiveness using Sarode et al or International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee criteria at 12 and 24 hours, (venous) thrombotic event rates, and inhospital mortality were performed by constructing Forest plots. Exploratory analysis using a logistic mixed model analysis was performed to identify factors associated with effectiveness and venous thromboembolic event. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 21 studies were included (andexanet: 438 patients; prothrombin complex concentrate: 1,278 patients). The (weighted) mean effectiveness for andexanet alfa was 82% at 12 hours and 71% at 24 hours. The (weighted) mean effectiveness for prothrombin complex concentrate was 88% at 12 hours and 76% at 24 hours. The mean 30-day symptomatic venous thromboembolic event rates were 5.0% for andexanet alfa and 1.9% for prothrombin complex concentrate. The mean 30-day total thrombotic event rates for andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrate were 10.7% and 3.1%, respectively. Mean inhospital mortality was 23.3% for andexanet versus 15.8% for prothrombin complex concentrate. Exploratory analysis controlling for potential confounders did not demonstrate significant differences between both reversal agents. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, available evidence does not unequivocally support the clinical effectiveness of andexanet alfa or prothrombin complex concentrate to reverse factor Xa inhibitor-associated acute major bleeding, nor does it permit conventional meta-analysis of potential superiority. Neither reversal agent was significantly associated with increased effectiveness or a higher rate of venous thromboembolic event. These results underscore the importance of randomized controlled trials comparing the two reversal agents and may provide guidance in designing institutional guidelines. Show less
Background: In premenopausal women, treatment with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors is associated with an increased risk of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA).... Show moreBackground: In premenopausal women, treatment with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors is associated with an increased risk of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Treatment with the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran appears to be associated with a reduced risk of HMB compared with VKA. These findings come from small observational studies or post hoc analyses of trials in which HMB was not a primary outcome. Use of tranexamic acid during the menstrual period may be effective in patients with HMB, but prospective data regarding efficacy and safety in patients on anticoagulant treatment are lacking.Rationale and Design: A direct comparison of a factor Xa inhibitor and a thrombin inhibitor with HMB as primary outcome, as well as an evaluation of the effects of adding tranexamic acid in women with anticoagulant-associated HMB is highly relevant for clinical practice. The MEDEA study is a randomized, open-label, pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate management strategies in premenopausal women with HMB associated with factor Xa inhibitor therapy.Outcomes: Women using factor Xa inhibitors with proven HMB, as assessed by a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score of >150, will be randomized to one of three study arms: (i) switch to dabigatran; (ii) continue factor Xa inhibitor with addition of tranexamic acid during the menstrual period; or (iii) continue factor Xa inhibitor without intervention. The primary outcome is the difference in PBAC score before and after randomization. Here, we present the rationale and highlight several unique features in the design of the study. Show less
The direct oral anticoagulants targeting coagulation factor Xa or thrombin are widelyused as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists in the management of venous thromboembolismand nonvalvular atrial... Show moreThe direct oral anticoagulants targeting coagulation factor Xa or thrombin are widelyused as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists in the management of venous thromboembolismand nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In case of bleeding or emergency surgery,reversal agents are helpful to counteract the anticoagulant therapy and restorehemostasis. While idarucizumab has been established as an antidote for the directthrombin inhibitor dabigatran, reversal strategies for the direct factor Xa inhibitorshave been a focal point in clinical care over the past years. In the absence of specificreversal agents, the off-label use of (activated) prothrombin complex concentrate andrecombinant factor VIIa have been suggested as effective treatment options duringinhibitor-induced bleeding complications. Meanwhile, several specific reversal agentshave been developed. In this review, an overview of the current state of nonspecific andspecific reversal agents for the direct factor Xa inhibitors is provided, focusing on thebiochemistry and mechanism of action and the preclinical assessment of newlyemerging therapies. Show less
Toorop, M.M.A.; Rein, N. van; Nierman, M.C.; Vermaas, H.W.; Huisman, M.V.; Meer, F.J.M. van der; ... ; Lijfering, W.M. 2020
Background Since direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases, patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have to decide whether to... Show moreBackground Since direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases, patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have to decide whether to remain on VKA or switch to DOAC. The goal of this study was to evaluate treatment satisfaction, preferences, and concerns among those who already have switched from VKA to DOAC.Methods A questionnaire was sent to 2920 former patients of three anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands, who switched from VKA to DOAC (2016-2017). Questions concerned demographics, treatment satisfaction, concerns, perspectives on antidotes, and monitoring. To identify predictors for being concerned about adverse events, logistic regression was used to estimate crude- and adjusted (age and sex) odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).Results One thousand, three hundred ninety-nine questionnaires (response rate 48%) were used for analysis. DOAC treatment satisfaction was high (mean 8.8 of a maximum 10-point score). A quarter of patients expressed concerns about adverse events. Predictors for being concerned were age < 60 years (vs age > 75 years, OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.6-6.4), female sex (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6), and high education (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2). Fifty-nine percent of all patients indicated antidote availability as important, 73% would be willing to participate in DOAC monitoring.Conclusions DOAC treatment satisfaction was high. A substantial number of patients expressed concerns about adverse events, especially women, patients aged < 60 years, or highly educated patients. Our findings among patients who already had switched to DOAC may assist in the process of shared decision-making when switching a patient from VKA to DOAC is considered. Show less
Toorop, M.M.A.; Rein, N. van; Nierman, M.C.; Vermaas, H.W.; Huisman, M.V.; Meer, F.J.M. van der; ... ; Lijfering, W.M. 2020
BackgroundMany patients who used vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for long-term prevention of thromboembolism are now actively switched to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Strict adherence to a DOAC... Show moreBackgroundMany patients who used vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for long-term prevention of thromboembolism are now actively switched to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Strict adherence to a DOAC is crucial for its success. However, therapy adherence and clinical factors that predict nonadherence are currently not well studied among patients who switched from a VKA to a DOAC.MethodsA questionnaire was developed and sent to 2920 former patients of 3 anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands, who switched from a VKA to a DOAC between January 2016 and December 2017. Questions concerned demographics, treatment persistence, adherence, and the occurrence of bleeding or thromboembolic events on DOACs. To identify predictors for nonadherence, logistic regression models were used to estimate crude and age/sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).ResultsA total of 1399 questionnaires (response rate 48%) were used for analysis. DOAC treatment persistence (94%) and adherence (86%) rates were high. Several predictors of nonadherence were identified, including young age (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 3.6-9.8 for <60 years compared to >75 years), low consultation frequency with a specialist (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2), a history of minor bleeding on DOACs (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.8), and a twice-daily dosing regimen (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6).ConclusionsSelf-reported treatment persistence and adherence were high in our study population, and several predictors of nonadherence were identified. Factors that can be influenced (low consult frequency with medical specialist, daily dosing regimen) may be used to improve therapy adherence. Show less
