Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tapentadol and oxycodone using the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and sensory evoked potentials. Methods: Twenty-one healthy volunteers... Show moreAims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tapentadol and oxycodone using the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and sensory evoked potentials. Methods: Twenty-one healthy volunteers completed a cross-over trial with oxycodone (10 mg), tapentadol (50 mg) extended-release tablets, or placebo treatment administered orally BID for 14 days. Electrical stimulations were delivered on the plantar side of the foot to evoke a nociceptive withdrawal reflex at baseline and post-interventions. Electromyography, recorded at tibialis anterior, and electroencephalography were recorded for analysis of: number of reflexes, latencies, and area under the curve of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex as well as latencies, amplitudes and dipole sources of the sensory-evoked potential. Results: Tapentadol decreased the odds ratio of eliciting nociceptive withdrawal reflex by -0.89 (P = .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.46, -0.32), whereas oxycodone increased the latency of the N1 component of the sensory-evoked potential at the vertex by 12.5 ms (P = .003, 95% CI 3.35, 21.69). Dipole sources revealed that the anterior cingulate component moved caudally for all three interventions (all P < .02), and the insula components moved caudally in both the oxycodone and tapentadol arms (all P < .03). Conclusion: A decrease in the number of nociceptive withdrawal reflex was observed during tapentadol treatment, possibly relating to the noradrenaline reuptake inhibition effects on the spinal cord. Both oxycodone and tapentadol affected cortical measures possible due to mu-opioid receptor agonistic effects evident in the dipole sources, with the strongest effect being mediated by oxycodone. These findings could support the dual effect analgesic mechanisms of tapentadol in humans as previously shown in preclinical studies. Show less
Algera, M.H.; Cotten, J.F.; Velzen, M. van; Niesters, M.; Boon, M.; Shoham, D.S.; ... ; Dahan, A. 2022
Objectives To evaluate if electrodiagnostic tools can advance the understanding in the effect of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) on pelvic floor activity, more specifically if SNM induces changes in... Show moreObjectives To evaluate if electrodiagnostic tools can advance the understanding in the effect of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) on pelvic floor activity, more specifically if SNM induces changes in pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction. Materials and Methods Single tertiary center, prospective study (October 2017-May 2018) including patients with overactive bladder syndrome undergoing SNM. Electromyography of the PFM was recorded using the Multiple Array Probe Leiden. The procedure consisted of consecutive stimulations of the lead electrodes with increasing intensity (1-3, 5, 7, 10 V). Recordings were made after electrode placement (T0) and three weeks of SNM (T1). Patients with >50% improvement were defined as responders, others as nonresponders. For the analyses, the highest electrical PFM response (EPFMR), defined as the peak-to-peak amplitude of the muscle response, was identified for each intensity. The sensitivity (intensity where the first EPFMR was registered and the normalized EPFMR as percentage of maximum EPFMR) and the evolution (EMFPR changes over time) were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results Fourteen patients were analyzed (nine responders, five nonresponders). For nonresponders, the PFM was significantly less sensitive to stimulation after three weeks (T0: 1.7 V, T1: 2.6 V). The normalized EPFMR was (significantly) lower after three weeks for the ipsilateral side of the PFM for the clinically relevant voltages (1 V: 36%-23%; p = 0.024, 2 V: 56%-29%; p = 0.00001; 3 V: 63%-37%; p = 0.0002). For the nonresponders, the mean EPFMR was significantly lower at 8/12 locations at T1 (T0: 109 mu V, T1: 58 mu V; mean p = 0.013, range <0.0001-0.0867). For responders, the sensitivity and evolution did not change significantly. Conclusions This is the first study to describe in detail the neurophysiological characteristics of the PFM, and the changes over time upon sacral spinal root stimulation, in responders and nonresponders to SNM. More research is needed to investigate the full potential of EPFMR as a response indicator. Show less
Krogt, H. van der; Kouwijzer, I.; Klomp, A.; Meskers, C.G.M.; Arendzen, J.H.; Groot, J.H. de 2020
Purpose: Loss of selective muscle activation after stroke contributes to impaired arm function, is difficult to quantify and is not systematically assessed yet. The aim of this study was to... Show morePurpose: Loss of selective muscle activation after stroke contributes to impaired arm function, is difficult to quantify and is not systematically assessed yet. The aim of this study was to describe and validate a technique for quantification of selective muscle activation of wrist flexor and extensor muscles in a cohort of post-stroke patients. Patterns of selective muscle activation were compared to healthy volunteers and test-retest reliability was assessed. Materials and methods: Activation Ratios describe selective activation of a muscle during its expected optimal activation as agonist and antagonist. Activation Ratios were calculated from electromyography signals during an isometric maximal torque task in 31 post-stroke patients and 14 healthy volunteers. Participants with insufficient voluntary muscle activation (maximal electromyography signal <3SD higher than baseline) were excluded. Results: Activation Ratios at the wrist were reliably quantified (Intraclass correlation coefficients 0.77-0.78). Activation Ratios were significantly lower in post-stroke patients compared to healthy participants (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Activation Ratios allow for muscle-specific quantification of selective muscle activation at the wrist in post-stroke patients. Loss of selective muscle activation may be a relevant determinant in assigning and evaluating therapy to improve functional outcome. Show less
Overbeek, C.L.; Kolk, A.; Nagels, J.; Witte, P.B. de; Zwaal, P. van der; Visser, C.P.J.; ... ; Groot, J.H. de 2018
