Objective To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the combined translabyrinthine (TL) and classic retrosigmoid (RS) approaches. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting National tertiary... Show moreObjective To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the combined translabyrinthine (TL) and classic retrosigmoid (RS) approaches. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting National tertiary referral center for skull base pathology. Participants Twenty-two patients with very large cerebellopontine angle tumors were resected using the combined TL-RS approach. Main Outcome Measures Preoperative patient characteristics including age, sex, and hearing loss. Tumor characteristics, pathology, and size. Intraoperative outcome: tumor removal. Postoperative outcomes included facial nerve function, residual tumor growth, and neurological deficits. Results Thirteen patients had schwannoma, eight had meningioma, and one had both. The mean age was 47 years, mean tumor size was 39 x 32 x 35 mm (anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, craniocaudal), and mean follow-up period was 80 months. Tumor control was achieved in 13 patients (59%), and 9 (41%) had residual tumor growth that required additional treatment. Seventeen patients (77%) had postoperative House-Brackmann (H-B) facial nerve function grades I to II, one had H-B grade III, one H-B grade V, and three H-B grade VI. Conclusion Combining TL and RS approaches may be helpful in safely removing large meningiomas and schwannomas in selected cases. This valuable technique should be considered when sufficient exposure cannot be achieved with the TL or RS approach alone. Show less
Background Both compression stockings and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are used for the prevention of post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumour... Show moreBackground Both compression stockings and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are used for the prevention of post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumour excisions.Objective In an attempt to optimise the prophylactic treatment in these patients, we compared LMWH (nadroparin) plus compression stockings to nadroparin as single therapy.Methods Patients undergoing CPA tumour excision in the period between January 2014 and November 2015 received nadroparin as a single therapy. Patients treated since November 2015 received, in addition to this therapy, peri-operative compression stockings as VTE prophylaxis due to a change in protocol. VTE was defined as symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and was confirmed via radiological imaging or autopsy.Results A total of 146 consecutive patients were reviewed. Treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographics and risk factors. Six of the 60 patients (10.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-20.5) receiving nadroparin single therapy developed symptomatic VTE. One out of 86 patients (1.2%; 95% CI 0-6.3) treated with combination therapy developed VTE ( p = 0.019) with a risk difference of 8.8% (95% CI 1.43-19.0). In comparison to combination therapy, nadroparin single therapy showed a relative risk of 8.6 (95% CI 1.1-69.6).Conclusion Adding compression stockings to peri-operative nadroparin, as a prophylactic strategy for thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing surgical intervention for CPA tumours, was associated with a significant reduction in the occurrence of VTE. Show less
