Simple Summary: Docetaxel has been approved as an anti-cancer agent in 1995. High rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) and fluid retention were observed when this agent was first introduced.... Show moreSimple Summary: Docetaxel has been approved as an anti-cancer agent in 1995. High rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) and fluid retention were observed when this agent was first introduced. The use of high dose systemic corticosteroids around docetaxel infusion appeared to decrease the incidence of HSR and fluid retention and has been applied in daily practice ever since. However, there is little evidence that supports this high dose of dexamethasone. Furthermore, the application of high-dosed corticosteroids can lead to undesirable adverse effects. In this phase 1 study, we aim to evaluate the impact of reducing the dose of dexamethasone as an adjunct to docetaxel on the incidence of HSR and fluid retention in patients with prostate or breast cancer. Background: There is little evidence that supports the registered high dose of dexamethasone used around docetaxel. However, this high dose is associated with considerable side effects. This study evaluates the feasibility of reducing the prophylactic oral dosage of dexamethasone around docetaxel infusion. Patients and methods: Eligible patients had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate or breast cancer and had received at least three cycles of docetaxel as monotherapy or combination therapy. Prophylactic dexamethasone around docetaxel infusion was administered in a de-escalating order per cohort of patients. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of grade III/IV fluid retention and hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Results: Of the 46 enrolled patients, 39 were evaluable (prostate cancer (n = 25), breast cancer (n = 14). In patients with prostate cancer, the dosage of dexamethasone was reduced to a single dose of 4 mg; in patients with breast cancer, the dosage was reduced to a 3-day schedule of 4 mg-8 mg-4 mg once daily, after which no further reduction has been tested. None of the 39 patients developed grade III/IV fluid retention or HSR. One patient (2.6%) had a grade 1 HSR, and there were six patients (15.4%) with grade I or II edema. There were no differences in quality of life (QoL) between cohorts. Conclusions: It seems that the prophylactic dose of dexamethasone around docetaxel infusion can be safely reduced with respect to the occurrence of grade III/IV HSRs or the fluid retention syndrome. Show less
Bakker, A.; Zee, J. van der; Tienhoven, G. van; Kok, H.P.; Rasch, C.R.N.; Crezee, H. 2019
Objective: Hyperthermia therapy (HT), heating tumors to 40?45??C, is a known radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy sensitizer. The additional benefit of HT to RT for recurrent breast cancer has been... Show moreObjective: Hyperthermia therapy (HT), heating tumors to 40?45??C, is a known radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy sensitizer. The additional benefit of HT to RT for recurrent breast cancer has been proven in multiple randomized trials. However, published outcome after RT?+?HT varies widely. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether there is a relationship between achieved HT dose and clinical outcome and thermal toxicity for patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with RT?+?HT. Method: Four databases, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov, were searched with the terms breast, radiotherapy, hyperthermia therapy and their synonyms. Final search was performed on 3 April 2019. Twenty-two articles were included in the systematic review, reporting on 2330 patients with breast cancer treated with RT?+?HT. Results: Thirty-two HT parameters were tested for a relationship with clinical outcome. In studies reporting a relationship, the relationship was significant for complete response in 10/15 studies, in 10/13 studies for duration of local control, in 2/2 studies for overall survival and in 7/11 studies for thermal toxicity. Patients who received high thermal dose had on average 34% (range 27%?53%) more complete responses than patients who received low thermal dose. Patients who achieved higher HT parameters had increased odds/probability on improved clinical outcome and on thermal toxicity. Conclusion: Temperature and thermal dose during HT had significant influence on complete response, duration of local control, overall survival and thermal toxicity of patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with RT?+?HT. Higher temperature and thermal dose improved outcome, while higher maximum temperature increased incidence of thermal toxicity. Show less
