Background: Patients with lower-leg injuries and those undergoing knee arthroscopy are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism. The mechanism is un-known, including the influence of... Show moreBackground: Patients with lower-leg injuries and those undergoing knee arthroscopy are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism. The mechanism is un-known, including the influence of lower-leg injury and knee arthroscopy on natural anticoagulant factors and fibrinolysis.Objectives: To study the effect of lower-leg injury and knee arthroscopy on plasma levels of anticoagulant and fibrinolytic factors.Methods: We applied the following 2 designs to investigate this effect: a cross-sectional study for lower-leg trauma and a before-and-after study for knee arthroscopy. Plasma samples of POT-CAST- and POT-KAST-randomized clinical trial participants (collected shortly after lower-leg trauma or before or after arthroscopy) were analyzed for clot lysis time and levels of antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, protein C, free protein S, plasminogen, tissue plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, antiplasmin, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, plasmin-antiplasmin, and D-dimer. For the effect of lower-leg injury, samples of 289 patients were compared with preoperative samples of 293 arthroscopy patients, acting as controls using linear regression and adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, and diurnal variation. For the effect of knee arthroscopy, mean changes were calculated for 277 patients using linear mixed models adjusted for diurnal variation. Parameters other than CLT and D-dimer were measured in smaller subsets.Results: In lower-leg injury patients, most parameters were stable, whereas D-dimer increased. After arthroscopy, most parameters decreased (especially clot lysis time, D-dimer, plasminogen, and anticoagulant factors), whereas tissue plasminogen activator and thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor slightly increased.Conclusion: In contrast to lower-leg injury, knee arthroscopy was associated with decreased natural anticoagulant factor levels. Neither lower-leg injury nor knee arthroscopy affected in vivo fibrinolysis. Show less
Background: Lower-leg injury and knee arthroscopy are both associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The mechanism of VTE in both situations is unknown, including the role of procoagulant... Show moreBackground: Lower-leg injury and knee arthroscopy are both associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The mechanism of VTE in both situations is unknown, including the role of procoagulant microparticles. This may provide useful information for individualizing thromboprophylactic treatment in both patient groups. Objective: We aimed to study the effect of (1) lower-leg trauma and (2) knee arthroscopy on procoagulant phospholipid-dependent (PPL) activity plasma levels. Methods: POT-(K)CAST trial participants who did not develop VTE were randomly selected for the current study. Plasma was collected shortly after lower-leg trauma or before and after knee arthroscopy. For aim 1, samples of 67 patients with lower-leg injury were compared with control samples (preoperative samples of 74 patients undergoing arthroscopy). Linear regression was used to obtain mean ratios (natural logarithm retransformed data), adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, infections, and comorbidities. For aim 2, pre- and postoperative samples of 49 patients undergoing arthroscopy were compared using paired t tests. PPL activity was measured using modified activated factor X-dependent PPL clotting assay. Results: For aim 1, PPL activity levels were almost threefold higher in patients with lower-leg injury compared with controls, that is, mean ratio, 2.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98-4.03). For aim 2, postoperative PPL activity levels did not change significantly, that is, mean change, -0.72 mU/mL (95% Cl, -2.03 to 0.59). Conclusion: Lower-leg trauma was associated with increased plasma levels of PPL activity, in contrast to knee arthroscopy. Lower-leg trauma triggers the release of procoagulant microparticles. Show less
Objective To assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) compared with open microdiscectomy among patients with sciatica.Methods This... Show moreObjective To assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) compared with open microdiscectomy among patients with sciatica.Methods This economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 12-month multicentre randomised controlled trial with a non-inferiority design, in which patients were randomised to PTED or open microdiscectomy. Patients were aged from 18 to 70 years and had at least 6 weeks of radiating leg pain caused by lumbar disc herniation. Effect measures included leg pain and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), as derived using the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Missing data were multiply imputed, bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty, and various sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the robustness.Results Of the 613 patients enrolled, 304 were randomised to PTED and 309 to open microdiscectomy. Statistically significant differences in leg pain and QALYs were found in favour of PTED at 12 months follow-up (leg pain: 6.9; 95% CI 1.3 to 12.6; QALYs: 0.040; 95% CI 0.007 to 0.074). Surgery costs were higher for PTED than for open microdiscectomy (ie, euro4500/patient vs euro4095/patient). All other disaggregate costs as well as total societal costs were lower for PTED than for open microdiscectomy. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that the probability of PTED being less costly and more effective (ie, dominant) compared with open microdiscectomy was 99.4% for leg pain and 99.2% for QALYs.Conclusions Our results suggest that PTED is more cost-effective from the societal perspective compared with open microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica. Show less