Aim: Determine incidence of visual impairment due to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and concomitant dis-abilities between 2009 and 2018 in the Netherlands and compare data to four former similar... Show moreAim: Determine incidence of visual impairment due to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and concomitant dis-abilities between 2009 and 2018 in the Netherlands and compare data to four former similar studies. Secondly, monitor if infants were missed for ROP-screening since the adoption of stricter, risk factor guided criteria (2013).Methods: Retrospective inventory on anonymous data of infants diagnosed with ROP from Dutch visual impairment-institutes. Data including: best corrected visual acuity, ROP-treatment and concomitant disabilities: bronchopulmonary dysplasia, behavioral abnormalities, epilepsy, hearing deficit, developmental delay, cerebral palsy and cerebral visual impairment. During the study period, lower age limit for neonatal life support (2010) and higher oxygen saturation targets (2014) were implemented.Results: Records of 53 infants were analyzed. Visual impairment incidence due to ROP was 2.02 per 100.000 live births (2000-2009: 1.84, p = 0.643). Compared to earlier periods (1975-2000), a significant decrease was observed. The incidence of concomitant disabilities remained stable. Mean gestational age (GA) continued to decrease to 26.6 & PLUSMN; 1.9 weeks (2000-2009: 27.4 & PLUSMN; 2.0 weeks, p = 0.047). All patients met the screening inclusion criteria.Conclusion: The incidence of visual impairment due to ROP and concomitant disabilities between 2009 and 2018 has not increased, despite lower GA and higher oxygen saturation targets. None of the infants were missed for ROP screening following introduction of more restricted screening inclusion criteria. Show less
Background Visual impairment frequently occurs amongst older people. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of visual impairment on functioning, quality of life... Show moreBackground Visual impairment frequently occurs amongst older people. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of visual impairment on functioning, quality of life and mortality in people aged 85 years. Methods From the Leiden 85-plus Study, 548 people aged 85 years were eligible for this study. Visual acuity was measured at baseline by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts (ETDRS). According to the visual acuity (VA) three groups were made, defined as no (VA > 0.7), moderate (0.5 <= VA <= 0.7) or severe visual impairment (VA < 0.5). Quality of life, physical, cognitive, psychological and social functioning were measured annually for 5 years. For mortality, participants were followed until the age of 95. Results At baseline, participants with visual impairment scored lower on physical, cognitive, psychological and social functioning and quality of life (p < 0.001). Compared to participants with no visual impairment, participants with moderate and severe visual impairment had an accelerated deterioration in basic activities of daily living (respectively 0.27-point (p = 0.017) and 0.35 point (p = 0.018)). In addition, compared to participants with no visual impairment, the mortality risk was 1.83 (95% CI 1.43, 2.35) for participants with severe visual impairment. Discussion In very older adults, visual impairment predicts accelerated deterioration in physical functioning. In addition, severely visually impaired adults had an increased mortality risk. A pro-active attitude, focussing on preventing and treating visual impairment could possibly contribute to the improvement of physical independence, wellbeing and successful aging in very old age. Show less
Topic: Visual impairment (VI) and cognitive impairment (CIM) are prevalent age-related conditions that impose substantial burden on the society. Findings on the hypothesized bidirectional... Show moreTopic: Visual impairment (VI) and cognitive impairment (CIM) are prevalent age-related conditions that impose substantial burden on the society. Findings on the hypothesized bidirectional association of VI and CIM remains equivocal. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this bidirectional relationship.Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central registers were searched systematically for observational studies, published from inception until April 6, 2020, in adults 40 years of age or older reporting objectively measured VI and CIM assessment using clinically validated cognitive screening tests or diagnostic evaluation. Meta-analyses on cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between VI and CIM outcomes (any CIM assessed using screening tests and clinically diagnosed dementia) were examined. Random effect models were used to generate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also examined study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity.Results: Forty studies were included (n=47 913 570). Meta-analyses confirmed that persons with VI were more likely to have CIM, with significantly higher odds of: (1) any CIM (cross-sectional: OR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.84-3.07]; longitudinal: OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.46-1.89]) and (2) clinically diagnosed dementia (cross-sectional: OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.48-4.01]; longitudinal: OR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.37-3.21]) compared with persons without VI. Significant heterogeneity was explained partially by differences in age, sex, and follow-up duration. Also, some evidence suggested that individuals with CIM, relative to cognitively intact persons, were more likely to have VI, with most articles (8/9 [89%]) reporting significantly positive associations; however, meta-analyses on this association could not be conducted because of insufficient data.Discussion: Overall, our work suggests that VI is a risk factor of CIM, although further work is needed to confirm the association of CIM as a risk factor for VI. Strategies for early detection and management of both conditions in older peoplemay minimize individual clinical and public health consequences. (C) 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology Show less
Borm, C.D.J.M.; Werkmann, M.; Visser, F.; Peball, M.; Putz, D.; Seppi, K.; ... ; Vries, N.M. de 2019
Due to the low quality level of visual input they receive in the form of printed text, beginning visually impaired readers are at a disadvantage in comparison to their peers. In the past,... Show moreDue to the low quality level of visual input they receive in the form of printed text, beginning visually impaired readers are at a disadvantage in comparison to their peers. In the past, typography has often been looked upon as a useful instrument to improve the legibility of the printed reading material that is being offered to children with low vision. However, the legiblity research efforts that were at the base of this conception were not always of good quality. In cognitive science for example, many efforts were made that were methodologically correct, yet the test material (the used typefaces) had little to do with reality. Many typefaces that were supposed to improve legibility were also suggested by typographers themselves, but the reasoning behind them was hardly ever sufficiently methodologically supported. Moreover, most legibility research focused on people with low vision in general, ignoring the fac t that visually impaired children constitute a very particular group with specific issues. This doctoral research project in design seeks to shed a light on legibility in the context of visually impaired beginning readers. Starting from these findings and from a legibility research a first step is given to design a typeface that will be able to provide support for the target group of visually impaired children in the first stages of the reading process. Show less
