ObjectiveTextbook outcome (TO) is a composite outcome measure used in surgical oncology to compare hospital outcomes using multiple quality indicators. This study aimed to develop TO as an outcome... Show moreObjectiveTextbook outcome (TO) is a composite outcome measure used in surgical oncology to compare hospital outcomes using multiple quality indicators. This study aimed to develop TO as an outcome measure to assess healthcare quality for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for advanced-stage ovarian cancer.MethodsThis population-based study included all CRS for FIGO IIIC-IVB primary ovarian cancer registered in the Netherlands between 2017 and 2020. The primary outcome was TO, defined as a complete CRS, combined with the absence of 30-day mortality, severe complications, and prolonged length of admission (≥ten days). Delayed start of adjuvant chemotherapy (≥six weeks) was not included in TO because of missing data. Logistic regressions were used to assess the association of case-mix factors with TO. Hospital variation was displayed using funnel plots.ResultsA total of 1909 CRS were included, of which 1434 were interval CRS and 475 were primary CRS. TO was achieved in 54% of the interval CRS cohort and 47% of the primary CRS cohort. Macroscopic residual disease after CRS was the most important factor for not achieving TO. Age ≥ 70 was associated with lower TO rates in multivariable logistic regressions. TO rates ranged from 40% to 69% between hospitals in the interval CRS cohort and 22% to 100% in the primary CRS cohort. In both analyses, one hospital had significantly lower TO rates (different hospitals). Case-mix adjustment significantly affected TO rates in the primary CRS analysis.ConclusionsTO is a suitable composite outcome measure to detect hospital variation in healthcare quality for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer undergoing CRS. Case-mix adjustment improves the accuracy of the hospital comparison. Show less
Introduction: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite outcome measure covering the surgical care process in a single outcome measure. TO has an advantage over single outcome parameters with low event... Show moreIntroduction: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite outcome measure covering the surgical care process in a single outcome measure. TO has an advantage over single outcome parameters with low event rates, which have less discriminating impact to detect differences between hospitals. This study aimed to assess factors associated with TO, and evaluate hospital and network variation after case-mix correction in TO rates for liver surgery. Methods: This was a population-based retrospective study of all patients who underwent liver resection for malignancy in the Netherlands in 2019 and 2020. TO was defined as absence of severe postoperative complications, mortality, prolonged length of hospital stay, and readmission, and obtaining adequate resection margins. Multivariable logistic regression was used for case-mix adjustment. Results: 2376 patients were included. TO was accomplished in 1380 (80%) patients with colorectal liver metastases, in 192 (76%) patients with other liver metastases, in 183 (74%) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and 86 (51%) patients with biliary cancers. Factors associated with lower TO rates for CRLM included ASA score >= 3 (aOR 0.70, CI 0.51-0.95 p = 0.02), extrahepatic disease (aOR 0.64, CI 0.44-0.95, p = 0.02), tumour size >55 mm on preoperative imaging (aOR 0.56, CI 0.34-0.94, p = 0.02), Charlson Comorbidity Index >= 2 (aOR 0.73, CI 0.54-0.98, p = 0.04), and major liver resection (aOR 0.50, CI 0.36-0.69, p < 0.001). After case-mix correction, no significant hospital or oncological network variation was observed. Conclusion: TO differs between indications for liver resection and can be used to assess between hospital and network differences. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
Akpinar, E.O.; Liem, R.S.L.; Nienhuijs, S.W.; Greve, J.W.M.; Marang-van de Mheen, P.J.; Dutch Audit Treatment Obesity Research Group 2022
Purpose: Hospitals performing a certain bariatric procedure in high volumes may have better outcomes. However, they could also have worse outcomes for some patients who are better off receiving... Show morePurpose: Hospitals performing a certain bariatric procedure in high volumes may have better outcomes. However, they could also have worse outcomes for some patients who are better off receiving another procedure. This study evaluates the effect of hospital preference for a specific type of bariatric procedure on their overall weight loss results. Methods: All hospitals performing bariatric surgery were included from the nationwide Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity. For each hospital, the expected (E) numbers of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) were calculated given their patient-mix. These were compared with the observed (O) numbers as the O/E ratio in a funnel plot. The 95% control intervals were used to identify outlier hospitals performing a certain procedure significantly more often than expected given their patient-mix (defined as hospital preference for that procedure). Similarly, funnel plots were created for the outcome of patients achieving >= 25% total weight loss (TWL) after 2 years, which was linked to each hospital's preference. Results: A total of 34,558 patients were included, with 23,154 patients completing a 2-year follow-up, of whom 79.6% achieved >= 25%TWL. Nine hospitals had a preference for RYGB (range O/E ratio [1.09-1.53]), with 1 having significantly more patients achieving >= 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.06]). Of 6 hospitals with a preference for SG (range O/E ratio [1.10-2.71]), one hospital had significantly fewer patients achieving >= 25%TWL (O/E ratio [0.90]), and from two hospitals with a preference for OAGB (range O/E ratio [4.0-6.0]), one had significantly more patients achieving >= 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.07]). One hospital had no preference for any procedure but did have significantly more patients achieving >= 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.10]). Conclusion: Hospital preference is not consistently associated with better overall weight loss results. This suggests that even though experience with a procedure may be slightly less in hospitals not having a preference, it is still sufficient to achieve similar weight loss outcomes when surgery is provided in centralized high-volume bariatric institutions. Show less
OBJECTIVES: Quality assessment is an important element in providing surgical cancer care. The main objective of this study was to develop a new composite measure 'textbook outcome', to evaluate and... Show moreOBJECTIVES: Quality assessment is an important element in providing surgical cancer care. The main objective of this study was to develop a new composite measure 'textbook outcome', to evaluate and improve quality of surgical care for patients undergoing a resection for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).METHODS: All patients undergoing an anatomical resection for NSCLC from 2012 to 2016 registered in the nationwide Dutch Lung Cancer Audit were included in an analysis to assess usefulness of a composite measure as a quality indicator. Based on expert opinion, textbook outcome was defined as having a complete resection (negative resection margins and sufficient lymph node dissection), plus no 30-day or in-hospital mortality, no reintervention in 30days, no readmission to the intensive care unit, no prolonged hospital stay (<14days), no hospital readmission after discharge and no major complications. The percentage of patients with a textbook outcome was calculated per hospital. Between-hospital variation in textbook outcome was analysed using case-mix adjustment models.RESULTS: In total, 5513 patients were included in this study. Textbook outcome was achieved in 26.4% of patients. Insufficient lymph node dissection had the most substantial effect on not realizing textbook outcome. If 'sufficient lymph node dissection' was not included as a criterion, textbook outcome would be 60.7%. Case-mix adjusted textbook outcome proportions per hospitals varied between 13.2% and 37.7%.CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to focusing on a single aspect, the composite measure textbook outcome provides insight into comprehensive performance in NSCLC surgery. It can be used to evaluate both individual hospitals and national performance and provides the opportunity to give benchmarked feedback to thoracic surgeons. Show less
