BackgroundIn an international randomised controlled phase II study of temozolomide (TMZ) versus TMZ in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) in locally diagnosed non-1p/19q co-deleted World Health... Show moreBackgroundIn an international randomised controlled phase II study of temozolomide (TMZ) versus TMZ in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) in locally diagnosed non-1p/19q co-deleted World Health Organization grade 2 or 3 gliomas with a first and contrast-enhancing recurrence after initial radiotherapy, and overall survival at 12 months was not significantly different (61% in the TMZ arm and 55% in the TMZ + BEV arm).ObjectivesHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) was a key secondary end-point in this trial, and the main objective of this study was to determine the impact of the addition of BEV to TMZ on HRQoL.MethodsHRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (version 3) and QLQ-BN20 at baseline, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression. The pre-selected primary HRQoL end-point was the QLQ-C30 global health scale, with self-perceived cognitive functioning and pain selected as secondary HRQoL issues. Analysis was undertaken using linear mixed modelling and complemented with sensitivity analyses using summary statistics. A difference was considered clinically relevant with ≥10 points difference on a 100-point scale.ResultsBaseline compliance was high at 94% and remained above 60% until 72 weeks, limiting the analysis to 60 weeks. Compliance was similar in both arms. We found no statistically significant or clinically significant differences between the primary HRQoL end-point in both treatment arms (p = 0.2642). The sensitivity analyses confirmed this finding. The overall test for post-baseline differences between the two treatment arms also showed no statistically or clinically significant differences regarding the selected secondary end-point scales. Show less
Clement, P.M.J.; Dirven, L.; Eoli, M.; Sepulveda-Sanchez, J.M.; Walenkamp, A.M.E.; Frenel, J.S.; ... ; Bent, M.J. van den 2021
Background: In the EORTC 1410/ INTELLANCE 2 randomised, phase II study (NCT02343406), with the antibody-edrug conjugate depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M, ABT-414) in patients with recurrent EGFR... Show moreBackground: In the EORTC 1410/ INTELLANCE 2 randomised, phase II study (NCT02343406), with the antibody-edrug conjugate depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M, ABT-414) in patients with recurrent EGFR-amplified glioblastoma, the primary end-point (overall survival) was not met, and the drug had ocular dose-limiting toxicity. This study reports results from the prespecified health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and neurological deterioration-free survival (NDFS) exploratory analysis.Patients and methods: Patients (n Z 260) were randomised 1:1:1 to receive either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg or 1.0 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks with oral temozolomide (TMZ) 150 mg/ m(2), Depatux-M alone, or TMZ or oral lomustine (CCNU) 110 mg/ m(2) ( TMZ/CCNU). HRQoL outcomes were recorded using the EORTC core Quality of Life QLQ-C30, and brain cancer-specific QLQ-BN20 questionnaires. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, weeks 8 and 16, and month 6, and changes from baseline to each time point were calculated. NDFS was defined as time to first deterioration in World Health Organisation performance status.Results: Compliance with HRQoL was 88.1% at baseline and decreased to 37.9% at month 6. Differences from baseline between Depatux-M arms and TMZ/CCNU in global health/QoL status throughout treatment did not reach clinical relevance (>= 10 points). Self-reported visual disorders deteriorated to a clinically relevant extent with Depatux-M arms versus TMZ/CCNU at all timepoints (mean differences range: 24.6-35.1 points). Changes from baseline for other HRQoL scales and NDFS were generally similar between treatment arms.Conclusions: Depatux-M had no impact on HRQoL and NDFS in patients with EGFRamplified recurrent glioblastoma, except for more visual disorders, an expected side- effect of the study drug. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Chondrosarcomas are chemo- and radiotherapy resistant and frequently harbor mutationsin isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1 or IDH2), causing increased levels of D-2-hydroxyglutarate(D-2-HG). DNA repair... Show moreChondrosarcomas are chemo- and radiotherapy resistant and frequently harbor mutationsin isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1 or IDH2), causing increased levels of D-2-hydroxyglutarate(D-2-HG). DNA repair defects and synthetic lethality with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)inhibition occur in IDH mutant glioma and leukemia models. Here we evaluated DNA repairand PARP inhibition, alone or combined with chemo- or radiotherapy, in chondrosarcoma celllines with or without endogenous IDH mutations. Chondrosarcoma cell lines treated with thePARP inhibitor talazoparib were examined for dose–response relationships, as well as underlyingcell death mechanisms and DNA repair functionality. Talazoparib was combined with chemo- orradiotherapy to evaluate potential synergy. Cell lines treated long termwith an inhibitor normalizingD-2-HG levels were investigated for synthetic lethality with talazoparib. We report that talazoparibsensitivity was variable and irrespective of IDH mutation status. All cell lines expressed AtaxiaTelangiectasia Mutated (ATM), but a subset was impaired in poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation)capacity, homologous recombination, andO-6-methylguanine-DNAmethyltransferase (MGMT) expression.Talazoparib synergized with temozolomide or radiation, independent of IDH1 mutant inhibition.This study suggests that talazoparib combined with temozolomide or radiation are promisingtherapeutic strategies for chondrosarcoma, irrespective of IDH mutation status. A subset ofchondrosarcomas may be deficient in nonclassical DNA repair pathways, suggesting that PARPinhibitor sensitivity is multifactorial in chondrosarcoma. Show less
