Flexible high-definition white-light endoscopy is the current gold standard in screening for cancer and its precursor lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. However, miss rates are high, especially... Show moreFlexible high-definition white-light endoscopy is the current gold standard in screening for cancer and its precursor lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. However, miss rates are high, especially in populations at high risk for developing gastrointestinal cancer (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, Lynch syndrome, or Barrett's esophagus) where lesions tend to be flat and subtle. Fluorescence molecular endoscopy (FME) enables intraluminal visualization of (pre)malignant lesions based on specific biomolecular features rather than morphology by using fluorescently labeled molecular probes that bind to specific molecular targets. This strategy has the potential to serve as a valuable tool for the clinician to improve endoscopic lesion detection and real-time clinical decision-making. This narrative review presents an overview of recent advances in FME, focusing on probe development, techniques, and clinical evidence. Future perspectives will also be addressed, such as the use of FME in patient stratification for targeted therapies and potential alliances with artificial intelligence. Key Messages center dot Fluorescence molecular endoscopy is a relatively new technology that enables safe and real-time endoscopic lesion visualization based on specific molecular features rather than on morphology, thereby adding a layer of information to endoscopy, like in PET-CT imaging. center dot Recently the transition from preclinical to clinical studies has been made, with promising results regarding enhancing detection of flat and subtle lesions in the colon and esophagus. However, clinical evidence needs to be strengthened by larger patient studies with stratified study designs. center dot In the future fluorescence molecular endoscopy could serve as a valuable tool in clinical workflows to improve detection in high-risk populations like patients with Barrett's esophagus, Lynch syndrome, and inflammatory bowel syndrome, where flat and subtle lesions tend to be malignant up to five times more often. center dot Fluorescence molecular endoscopy has the potential to assess therapy responsiveness in vivo for targeted therapies, thereby playing a role in personalizing medicine. center dot To further reduce high miss rates due to human and technical factors, joint application of artificial intelligence and fluorescence molecular endoscopy are likely to generate added value. Show less
Stabile, A.; Dell'Oglio, P.; Soligo, M.; Cobelli, F. de; Gandaglia, G.; Fossati, N.; ... ; Briganti, A. 2021
Background: There is a lack of evidence on the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in young patients.Objective: We... Show moreBackground: There is a lack of evidence on the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in young patients.Objective: We hypothesised that the diagnostic performance of MRI for csPCa varies according to patient's age. To address this, we assessed the variation in the csPCa detection rate of MRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) versus systematic random biopsy (SBx) across different patient ages.Design, setting, and participants: We retrospectively identified 930 patients who underwent prostate MRI and subsequent biopsy at two referral centres between 2013 and 2018. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was used for MRI reporting.Intervention: A lesion with a PI-RADS score of >= 3 detected at MRI received an MRI-TBx in addition to an SBx during the same session.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The outcome of our study was the relationship between age and csPCa detection rate at MRI-TBx and SBx, respectively. Clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) was defined as the presence of PCa with Gleason score >= 3 + 4. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVAs) predicting csPCa detection were assessed for both MRI-TBx and SBx. Covariates were age, prostate-specific antigen density, PI-RADS score, previous biopsy status, digital rectal examination, and the number of targeted and systematic cores. The hypothesis that MRI accuracy in detecting csPCa differed by age was finally tested with a nonparametric loess analysis.Results and limitations: The overall rate of csPCa was 54% (n = 506). Overall, 325 (35%) and 461 (50%) patients had csPCa at SBx and MRI-TBx, respectively. The median numbers of SBx and MRI-TBx cores were 12 (interquartile range [IQR]: 10-13) and 5 (IQR: 4-7), respectively. At MVA, age at biopsy was an independent predictor of csPCa at MRI-TBx only (odds ratio: 1.05), after accounting for confounders. In men aged less than roughly 50 yr, SBx had a higher probability of detecting csPCa relative to MRI-TBx (25% vs 16% at 40 yr). Conversely, in patients aged >50 yr, the probability of csPCa was higher in MRI-TBx than in SBx, reaching the highest difference for very elderly patients (48% vs 68% at 80 yr). The main limitations were the retrospective design and the small number of young patients.Conclusions: In this study, we reported the performance of MRI and MRI-TBx in detecting csPCa changes according to patients' age.Patient summary: In young patients, the performance of a systematic random biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is higher relative to magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx), reflecting the lower accuracy of MRI in younger men. Conversely, in older patients, MRI-TBx showed a clinical benefit with a higher csPCa detection rate compared with SBx, suggesting an increase of MRI accuracy with the increase of age. (C) 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Show less
