BackgroundAutoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease of the liver. The treatment goal is reaching complete biochemical response (CR), defined as the normalisation of... Show moreBackgroundAutoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease of the liver. The treatment goal is reaching complete biochemical response (CR), defined as the normalisation of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases and immunoglobulin gamma. Ongoing AIH activity can lead to fibrosis and (decompensated) cirrhosis. Incomplete biochemical response is the most important risk factor for liver transplantation or liver-related mortality. First-line treatment consists of a combination of azathioprine and prednisolone. If CR is not reached, tacrolimus (TAC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be used as second-line therapy. Both products are registered for the prevention of graft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TAC and MMF as second-line treatment for AIH.MethodsThe TAILOR study is a phase IIIB, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised (1:1) controlled trial performed in large teaching and university hospitals in the Netherlands. We will enrol 86 patients with AIH who have not reached CR after at least 6 months of treatment with first-line therapy. Patients are randomised to TAC (0.07 mg/kg/day initially and adjusted by trough levels) or MMF (max 2000 mg/day), stratified by the presence of cirrhosis at inclusion. The primary endpoint is the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 12 months. Secondary endpoints include the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 6 months, adverse effects, difference in fibrogenesis, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.DiscussionThis is the first randomised controlled trial comparing two second-line therapies for AIH. Currently, second-line treatment is based on retrospective cohort studies. The rarity of AIH is the main issue in clinical research for alternative treatment options. The results of this trial can be implemented in existing international clinical guidelines.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05221411. Retrospectively registered on 3 February 2022; EudraCT number 2021-003420-33. Prospectively registered on 16 June 2021. Show less
Ruijter, B.N.; Inderson, A.; Berg, A.P. van den; Metselaar, H.J.; Dubbeld, J.; Tushuizen, M.E.; ... ; Hoek, B. van 2023
Background and Aims: Previous trials comparing cyclo-sporine and tacrolimus after liver transplantation (LT) showed conflicting results. Most used trough monitoring for cyclo-sporine (C0), leading... Show moreBackground and Aims: Previous trials comparing cyclo-sporine and tacrolimus after liver transplantation (LT) showed conflicting results. Most used trough monitoring for cyclo-sporine (C0), leading to less accurate dosing than with 2-h monitoring (C2). Only one larger trial compared C2 with tac-rolimus based on trough level (T0) after LT, with similar treat-ed biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR) and graft loss, while a smaller trial had less tBPAR with C2 compared to T0. There-fore, it is still unclear which calcineurin inhibitor is preferred after LT. We aimed to demonstrate superior efficacy (tBPAR), tolerability, and safety of C2 or T0 after first LT. Methods: Patients after first LT were randomized to C2 or T0. tBPAR, patient-and graft survival, safety and tolerability were the main endpoints, with analysis by Fisher test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test. Results: In intention-to- treat analysis 84 patients on C2 and 85 on T0 were included. Cumulative incidence of tBPAR C2 vs. T0 was 17.7% vs. 8.4% at 3 months (p=0.104), and 21.9% vs. 9.7% at 6 and 12 months (p=0.049). One-year cumulative mortality C2 vs. T0 was 15.5% vs. 5.9% (p=0.049) and graft loss 23.8% vs. 9.4% (p=0.015). Serum triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol was lower with T0 than with C2. Incidence of diarrhea in T0 vs, C2 was 64% vs. 31% (p <= 0.001), with no other differences in safety and tolerability. Conclusions: In the first year after LT immunosuppression with T0 leads to less tBPAR and better patient-/re-transplant-free survival as compared to C2. Show less
Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease compared to the general population. This is partly driven by their use of immunosuppressive therapy, which... Show moreKidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease compared to the general population. This is partly driven by their use of immunosuppressive therapy, which influences inflammatory responses and viral loads. Current guidelines suggest to withdraw mycophenolate while calcineurin inhibitors are often continued during a COVID-19 infection. However, clinical signs of calcineurin toxicity have been described in multiple COVID-19 positive KTRs. In this report we describe the course of tacrolimus exposure prior to, during, and post COVID-19 in observations from three clinical cases as well as four KTRs from a controlled trial population. We postulate inflammation driven downregulation of the CYP3A metabolism as a potential mechanism for higher tacrolimus exposure. To mitigate the risk of tacrolimus overexposure and toxicity therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in KTRs with COVID-19 both in the in-, out-patient and home monitoring setting. Show less
Baven-Pronk, M.A.M.C.; Hew, J.M.; Biewenga, M.; Tushuizen, M.E.; Berg, A.P. van den; Bouma, G.; ... ; Dutch Autoimmune Hepatitis Study G 2022
Background and Aims: A considerable number of au-toimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients completely or partially fail on first-line treatment. Several studies on the use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs)... Show moreBackground and Aims: A considerable number of au-toimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients completely or partially fail on first-line treatment. Several studies on the use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in the treatment of AIH have been published without focusing on indication. The aim was to assess the efficacy of CNIs in the treatment of adult AIH patients, specifically focusing on indication: first-line intolerant and with first-line insufficient response (failure to achieve or maintain remission), and with second versus third-line treatment. Methods: A literature search included studies on the use of CNIs in adult AIH. Patients with past or present use of CNIs from the Dutch AIH group cohort were added. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission while using CNIs. Secondary endpoints were biochemical response, treatment failure, and adverse effects. Results: Twenty studies from the literature and nine Dutch patients were included describing the use of cyclosporine in 59 and tacrolimus in 219 adult AIH patients. The CNI remission rate was 53% in patients with insufficient response to first-line treatment and 67% in patients intolerant to first-line treat-ment. CNIs were used as second-line treatment in 73% with a remission rate of 52% and as third-line treatment in 22% with a remission rate of 26%. Cyclosporine was discontin-ued in 13% and tacrolimus in 11% of patients because of adverse events. Conclusions: CNIs as rescue treatment in adult AIH patients are reasonably effective and safe both with insufficient response or intolerance to previous treat-ment. Prospective studies are needed. Show less
Francke, M.I.; Andrews, L.M.; H.L. le; Velde, D. van de; Dieterich, M.; Udomkarnjananun, S.; ... ; Hesselink, D.A. 2022
Introduction: After kidney transplantation, rejection and drug-related toxicity occur despite tacrolimus whole blood pre-dose concentrations ([Tac](blood)) being within the target range. The... Show moreIntroduction: After kidney transplantation, rejection and drug-related toxicity occur despite tacrolimus whole blood pre-dose concentrations ([Tac](blood)) being within the target range. The tacrolimus concentration within peripheral blood mononuclear cells ([Tac](cells)) might correlate better with clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between [Tac](blood) and [Tac](cells), the evolution of [Tac](cells) and the [Tac](cells)/[Tac](blood) ratio, and to assess the relationship between tacrolimus concentrations and the occurrence of rejection. Methods: In this prospective study, samples for the measurement of [Tac](blood) and [Tac](cells) were collected on days 3 and 10 after kidney transplantation, and on the morning of a for-cause kidney transplant biopsy. Biopsies were reviewed according to the Banff 2019 update. Results: Eighty-three [Tac](cells) samples were measured of 44 kidney transplant recipients. The correlation between [Tac](cells) and [Tac](blood) was poor (Pearson's r = 0.56 (day 3); r = 0.20 (day 10)). Both the dose-corrected [Tac](cells) and the [Tac](cells)/[Tac](blood) ratio were not significantly different between days 3 and 10, and the median inter-occasion variability of the dose-corrected [Tac](cells) and the [Tac](cells)/[Tac](blood) ratio were 19.4% and 23.4%, respectively (n = 24). Neither [Tac](cells), [Tac](blood), nor the [Tac](cells)/[Tac](blood) ratio were significantly different between patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection (n = 4) and patients with acute tubular necrosis (n = 4) or a cancelled biopsy (n = 9; p > 0.05). Conclusion: Tacrolimus exposure and distribution appeared stable in the early phase after transplantation. [Tac](cells) was not significantly associated with the occurrence of rejection. A possible explanation for these results might be related to the low number of patients included in this study and also due to the fact that PBMCs are not a specific enough matrix to monitor tacrolimus concentrations. Show less
After using C0-monitoring as the tool for therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine for many years, studies suggested that C2-monitoring might be better. After switching 31 liver transplant... Show moreAfter using C0-monitoring as the tool for therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine for many years, studies suggested that C2-monitoring might be better. After switching 31 liver transplant patients using cyclosporine from C0 via C2 to flexible limited sampling models (LSM), combinations of blood sampling time points 0+2h (r_=0.94); 0+1+2h (r_=0.94); 0+1+3h (r_=0.92); 0+2+3h (r_=0.92) and 0+1+2+3h (r_=0.96) showed excellent correlation with AUC0-12h with acceptable precision and bias. When evaluating the LSM0+1+2+3h model in the 18 months after introduction there was no significant change in average cyclosporine dose and creatinine clearance, compared to previous C2-monitoring. Especially LSM0+2h was optimal in terms of accuracy, ease-of-use and intrapatient variability. When optimizing tacrolimus monitoring after calculating limited sampling formulas (LSF) and LSM single and multiple-point combinations showed good correlations with AUC0-12h. The best single point calculation in terms of estimating systemic tacrolimus exposure using LSM were LSM 4h (r_=0.97) and LSM 6h (r_=0.97). During the study of the pharmacokinetic behaviour of MMF we found a wide range in MPA clearance in the population (8.08__57.47 L/h). Looking at possible sources of this variability in MPA clearance we divided our group, based on clinical selection, into two groups (with and without calcineurin inhibitors). These groups were used for further development of LSM for monitoring MPA. The combination 0-_-1-2h showed very good correlations with trapezoidal AUC0-12h for both models, with acceptable bias and precision. Show less
Calcineurin inhibitors are crucial in the prevention of acute rejection in the first year after renal transplantation. Unfortunately, these drugs (ciclosporin A, tacrolimus) are characterized by... Show moreCalcineurin inhibitors are crucial in the prevention of acute rejection in the first year after renal transplantation. Unfortunately, these drugs (ciclosporin A, tacrolimus) are characterized by serious clinical toxicity and between patient variability in their effect. Therefore, the dose of these drugs should be individualized in order to reach a balance between rejection and toxicity. This thesis aimed to describe the variability between and within patients using mathematical models and subsequently to explain this variability. Genetic and non-genetic factors were used to explain variability and several factors were identified (polymorphism in metabolism enzyme CYP3A5, body weight, concomitant prednisolone dose). For this purpose drug concentrations in blood are measured as a concentration biomarker. Furthermore, another biomarker the activity ot the target enzyme calcineurin was determined in leukocytes, but was found to be more variable within patients than between patients. This response biomarker was not found to be clinically useful to individualize the drug dosage. Finally, pharmacological determinants for subclinical acute rejection at 6 months were determined in patients treated with ciclosporin. Although ciclosporin exposure and several genetic variants were not found to relate, a previous acute rejection period and a kidney from a deceased donor increased the risk of rejection 5-fold. Show less
Over the last decades, restoration of renal function by renal allograft transplantation has evolved into the preferred treatment option for patients with end stage renal disease. The introduction... Show moreOver the last decades, restoration of renal function by renal allograft transplantation has evolved into the preferred treatment option for patients with end stage renal disease. The introduction of the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine and tacrolimus have significantly contributed to this success. Adverse drug effects, together with the large inter-individual variation in pharmacokinetics of both drugs necessitates therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Nowadays, TDM is routinely performed by drug concentration measurement in blood. Unfortunately, the incidence of acute allograft rejection episodes is still 10-20% within first year after transplantation. A strategy to improve clinical immunesuppresion early after transplantation is improved monitoring. Next to advanced pharmacokinetic monitoring, such as estimated AUC monitoring, the development of pharmacodynamic markers could theoretically contribute to improve CNI therapy. Pharmacodynamic monitoring strategies, however, are still in an experimental phase and have not proven clinical benefit yet. They carry the theoretical advantage of monitoring the true effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy. This led us to investigate pharmacodynamic monitoring as potential tool to guide drug dosing. We choose calcineurin activity as pharmacodynamic marker for monitoring and in this thesis, the analytical aspects, fundamental characteristics and insights in clinical usefulness of calcineurin activity measurement as a pharmacodynamic marker for CNI were investigated. Show less
