Purpose Surgical fluorescence guidance has gained popularity in various settings, e.g., minimally invasive robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. In pursuit of novel receptor-targeted tracers, the... Show morePurpose Surgical fluorescence guidance has gained popularity in various settings, e.g., minimally invasive robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. In pursuit of novel receptor-targeted tracers, the field of fluorescence-guided surgery is currently moving toward increasingly lower signal intensities. This highlights the importance of understanding the impact of low fluorescence intensities on clinical decision making. This study uses kinematics to investigate the impact of signal-to-background ratios (SBR) on surgical performance.Methods Using a custom grid exercise containing hidden fluorescent targets, a da Vinci Xi robot with Firefly fluorescence endoscope and ProGrasp and Maryland forceps instruments, we studied how the participants' (N=16) actions were influenced by the fluorescent SBR. To monitor the surgeon's actions, the surgical instrument tip was tracked using a custom video-based tracking framework. The digitized instrument tracks were then subjected to multi-parametric kinematic analysis, allowing for the isolation of various metrics (e.g., velocity, jerkiness, tortuosity). These were incorporated in scores for dexterity (Dx), decision making (DM), overall performance (PS) and proficiency. All were related to the SBR values.Results Multi-parametric analysis showed that task completion time, time spent in fluorescence-imaging mode and total pathlength are metrics that are directly related to the SBR. Below SBR 1.5, these values substantially increased, and handling errors became more frequent. The difference in Dx and DM between the targets that gave SBR <1.50 and SBR> 1.50, indicates that the latter group generally yields a 2.5-fold higher Dx value and a threefold higher DM value. As these values provide the basis for the PS score, proficiency could only be achieved at SBR> 1.55.Conclusion By tracking the surgical instruments we were able to, for the first time, quantitatively and objectively assess how the instrument positioning is impacted by fluorescent SBR. Our findings suggest that in ideal situations a minimum SBR of 1.5 is required to discriminate fluorescent lesions, a substantially lower value than the SBR 2 often reported in literature. Show less
BACKGROUND: Robotic neurosurgery may improve the accuracy, speed, and availability of stereotactic procedures. We recently developed a computer vision and artificial intelligence-driven frameless... Show moreBACKGROUND: Robotic neurosurgery may improve the accuracy, speed, and availability of stereotactic procedures. We recently developed a computer vision and artificial intelligence-driven frameless stereotaxy for nonimmobilized patients, creating an opportunity to develop accurate and rapidly deployable robots for bedside cranial intervention. OBJECTIVE: To validate a portable stereotactic surgical robot capable of frameless registration, real-time tracking, and accurate bedside catheter placement. METHODS: Four human cadavers were used to evaluate the robot's ability to maintain low surface registration and targeting error for 72 intracranial targets during head motion, ie, without rigid cranial fixation. Twenty-four intracranial catheters were placed robotically at predetermined targets. Placement accuracy was verified by computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: Robotic tracking of the moving cadaver heads occurred with a program runtime of 0.111 +/- 0.013 seconds, and the movement command latency was only 0.002 +/- 0.003 seconds. For surface error tracking, the robot sustained a 0.588 +/- 0.105 mm registration accuracy during dynamic head motions (velocity of 6.647 +/- 2.360 cm/s). For the 24 robotic-assisted intracranial catheter placements, the target registration error was 0.848 +/- 0.590 mm, providing a user error of 0.339 +/- 0.179 mm. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted stereotactic procedures on mobile subjects were feasible with this robot and computer vision image guidance technology. Frameless robotic neurosurgery potentiates surgery on nonimmobilized and awake patients both in the operating room and at the bedside. It can affect the field through improving the safety and ability to perform procedures such as ventriculostomy, stereo electroencephalography, biopsy, and potentially other novel procedures. If we envision catheter misplacement as a "never event," robotics can facilitate that reality. Show less
