Benign retroperitoneal tumors (BRT) represent a rare group of heterogeneous diseases. The literature lacks high-quality evidence about the optimal management of BRT, and most of the information... Show moreBenign retroperitoneal tumors (BRT) represent a rare group of heterogeneous diseases. The literature lacks high-quality evidence about the optimal management of BRT, and most of the information available takes the form of case reports or case series. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current management strategies for adult patients with BRT.A literature search using PubMed indexed articles was conducted and BRT were classified into five different biological subgroups: 1) lipomatous tumors, 2) smooth muscle tumors, 3) peripheral nerve sheath tumors, 4) myofibroblastic tumors, and 5) others. Tumors that are primarily pelvic in origin were excluded.Despite the significant heterogeneity of the disease, several generic considerations have emerged and can be applied to the management of BRT. Specifically, the risk of misdiagnosing a BRT with another pathology such as retroperitoneal sarcoma is notable. When encountered, suspected BRT should therefore be referred to a specialized sarcoma center. Multidisciplinary tumor boards, present at these centers, have a pivotal role in managing BRT. The decision of whether to offer surgery, nonsurgical treatment or a "watch-and-wait" approach should be made after multidisciplinary discussion, depending on tumor histology. Moving forward, collaborative research efforts dedicated to BRT remain crucial in gathering evidence and knowledge to further optimize patient care. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved. Show less
Introduction: This subgroup analysis of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity (eUPS) from the PERSARC collaborative group aimed to achieve a more personalized... Show moreIntroduction: This subgroup analysis of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity (eUPS) from the PERSARC collaborative group aimed to achieve a more personalized multimodality treatment approach for primary eUPS in elderly patients. Material and methods: A multicenter retrospective study including primary high-grade eUPS surgically treated with curative intent between 2000 and 2016. Overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM) curves were calculated by Kaplan Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the effect of radiotherapy. Results: From a total of 2511 patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) of the PERSARC study collaborative; 703 patients with eUPS were included in this study. In elderly patients with eUPS 5-year OS, LR and DM were 35.4 (95%CI 29.3-42.8), 17.7 (95%CI 12.7-22.6) and 24.6 (95%CI 19.1-30.1). eUPS was significantly less treated with radiotherapy compared with other eSTS, especially in elderly patients. Patients with R1-R2 margins treated with radiotherapy had about half the risk of developing LR compared with patients treated without radiotherapy (HR = 0.454, p = 0.033). Conclusion: Elderly patients with eUPS were less often treated with radiotherapy and showed higher LR. Nowadays, given an increasing life expectancy in elderly patients, multimodality treatment should be considered. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Show less
Laven, P.; Beltman, J.J.; Bense, J.E.; Aa, M.A. van der; Gorp, T. van; Vos, M.C.; ... ; Kruitwagen, R.F.P.M. 2021
Background: Incomplete surgical staging of patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has been reported in up to 98% of cases, when based on the International Federation of... Show moreBackground: Incomplete surgical staging of patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has been reported in up to 98% of cases, when based on the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) staging procedure. The aim of the present retrospective study was to clarify the reasons for incomplete staging.Methods: The PRISMA (Prevention Recovery Information System for Monitoring and Analysis) technique was used to evaluate cases with FIGO I-IIa EOC based on incomplete staging from five gynecologic oncologic center hospitals in the Netherlands in the period 2010-2014.Results: Fifty cases with an incomplete surgical staging of EOC according to national guidelines were included. The most common reasons for incomplete staging were insufficient random biopsies of the peritoneum (n = 34, 68%), and less than ten lymph nodes being resected and/or found at pathology (n = 16, 32%). The most mentioned reason for not performing biopsies was, besides forgetting to do so, believing that after careful inspection and palpation, taking biopsies is irrelevant and/or already are being taken while performing a hysterectomy (peritoneum of cul-de-sac, bladder). The value of contralateral pelvic lymph node dissection in case of a unilateral ovarian malignancy was also doubted, influencing the number of lymph nodes resected.Conclusions: The most important reasons for incomplete staging in EOC are, besides omitting elements by accident, questioning the importance of obligatory elements of the staging procedure. A structured list of staging steps during surgery and more evidence-based consensus concerning these obligatory elements might increase the number of complete staging procedures in EOC. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. Show less
This thesis describes the preferences of both older patients with breast cancer and clinicians to optimize the current care of this patient group. The significant increase in the number of breast... Show moreThis thesis describes the preferences of both older patients with breast cancer and clinicians to optimize the current care of this patient group. The significant increase in the number of breast cancer patients above the age of 65 years necessitates insight into their preferences. Decision-making regarding treatment of early breast cancer is often difficult as decisions need to be made between two surgical options and about the addition of systemic therapy. Like younger patients, older patients are faced with these difficult decisions (together with their clinician). However, treatments for early breast cancer differ substantially between younger and older patients, which possibly can be explained by the preferences of older patients or their clinicians. Currently, little is known about the preferences of older patients, while this knowledge is particularly of great value. To assess how the current care of older patients and the treatment-decision-making process with this patient group can be optimised, we explore the preferences and motivations of older patients with early breast cancer; if and how their preferences for treatment and participation in decision-making differ from those of younger patients; and the treatment preferences of breast cancer specialists with regard to treatment of older patients. Show less
This thesis focus on preclinical validation of novel fluorescent contrast agents for solid tumor imaging (Part I), the clinical introduction of NIR fluorescence sentinel lymph node imaging in... Show moreThis thesis focus on preclinical validation of novel fluorescent contrast agents for solid tumor imaging (Part I), the clinical introduction of NIR fluorescence sentinel lymph node imaging in several cancer types using indocyanine green (Part II) and the clinical translation of NIR fluorescence imaging using clinically available fluorescent contrast agents for solid tumor imaging (Part III) Show less
This thesis shows that quality of care in surgical oncology varies by provider and is partly based on differences in procedural volume and other attributes of hospitals. Especially for low-volume... Show moreThis thesis shows that quality of care in surgical oncology varies by provider and is partly based on differences in procedural volume and other attributes of hospitals. Especially for low-volume high-risk surgical procedures concentration of services in hospitals with better outcomes (outcome-based referral) can lead to dramatic improvement in short- as well as long-term outcomes. Casemix- and reliability adjustments are essential in the evaluation of quality of care. In addition, an integrated approach, in which several determinants of outcome are combined, might provide a more valid instrument to assess the quality of complex clinical processes. Clinical audit combines several ways to improve quality of care. It stimulates guideline adherence and provides clinicians with continuous and timely feedback on their performance, in relation to a national benchmark. Feedback itself has proven to be very effective, though the most important benefits of clinical audit can be found in the identification and appreciation of clinical processes that lead to better outcomes. This knowledge can be transferred to all practices treating such patient groups, improving outcome on a population-level. In addition, transparency of reliable, meaningful, hospital-specific outcome information, can catalyst the continuous process of quality improvement, steer patients to the right hospitals and reduce the costs of healthcare. Show less
