What we collectively call “stress” is how we experience our body’s reaction to a stressor. This response is aimed to deal with the current stressor and to prepare for recurrences in the future. The... Show moreWhat we collectively call “stress” is how we experience our body’s reaction to a stressor. This response is aimed to deal with the current stressor and to prepare for recurrences in the future. The stress response is for an important part dependent on glucocorticoid hormones. By and large, the acute response to glucocorticoids is beneficial, but chronic exposure often becomes maladaptive. To improve prevention and treatment of disorders we can develop due to stress, it is important to better understand the effects and working mechanisms of glucocorticoids. While we already possess extensive knowledge regarding glucocorticoids and glucocorticoid receptor signaling, we introduced and studied five “aspects of context”, which we felt address important current misconceptions or gaps of knowledge. Corticosterone was at the center of all the studies we performed, yet the eventual outcome of glucocorticoid receptor activation differed extensively in all experiments. Thus, the context in which corticosterone exerts its effects matters, and it is to researcher to be aware of this when designing new studies and interpreting available data. Whilst our research merely addressed some specific processes, the lessons learned from these experiments can be applied much broader to the biology of glucocorticoid signaling and other nuclear family members. Show less
Chronic stress is considered a vulnerability factor for depression. A key symptom is anhedonia; a reduced response to positive stimuli. Drugs are effective for only 20-40% of the patients and new... Show moreChronic stress is considered a vulnerability factor for depression. A key symptom is anhedonia; a reduced response to positive stimuli. Drugs are effective for only 20-40% of the patients and new drugs are urgently needed. The objective of the research was to develop a mouse model of depression that would express anhedonia, induced by chronic stress. Mice were repeatedly exposed to the non-physical presence of a rat. Alterations in stress system activity were measured. Anhedonia was assessed by studying the behavioral response to positive stimuli. As a potential therapeutical approach we assessed reward expectation, and studied the effect of repeated administration of mifepristone (glucocorticoid receptor antagonist), directly targeting stress system regulation. Our model induced changes in the sensitivity of the reward system that contributed to cognitive impairments underlying anhedonia. The effects could partially be restored by additional reward. Mifepristone in na_ve mice suppressed stress system activity, which could indicate a similar direction of effects in stressed mice if provided. Concluding, our chronic stress mouse model induces anhedonia. The new methodology to reduce stress by either providing additional positive stimuli or mifepristone, increases the well being of the mice and may prove a new drug target to treat depression in humans. Show less
An adverse early life event is considered a risk factor for stress-related psychiatric disorders in genetically predisposed individuals, probably because of its lasting effect on susceptibility to... Show moreAn adverse early life event is considered a risk factor for stress-related psychiatric disorders in genetically predisposed individuals, probably because of its lasting effect on susceptibility to stress. The objective of this thesis research was to examine in the mouse CD1 strain the immediate and permanent effects of an adverse early experience on the neuroendocrine stress system. For this purpose the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis was examined of mouse pups that were refrained from maternal care, a laboratory model for neglect mimicking aspects of abuse. The data show that the infants__ stress response system readily adapts to daily repeated 8 hours of maternal separation, but that it continues to respond to a novelty stressor. The rapid adaptation to repeated maternal absence seems rather due to the ability to predict return of the mother than to adjust metabolism to episodic food deprivation. If maternal separation was extended to a single episode of 24 hours the immediate outcome was more profound but transient, although subtle effects on stress reactions and cognitive performance did persist. The findings demonstrate the amazing plasticity of the newborn brain and provide a basis to study the mechanistic underpinning of vulnerability or resilience to psychopathology. Show less
