Introduction: Curative-intent treatment of superior sulcus tumors (SSTs) of the lung invading the spine presents considerable challenges. We retrospectively studied outcomes in a single center,... Show moreIntroduction: Curative-intent treatment of superior sulcus tumors (SSTs) of the lung invading the spine presents considerable challenges. We retrospectively studied outcomes in a single center, uniformly staged patient cohort treated with induction concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection (trimodality therapy).Methods: An institutional surgical database from the period between 2002 and 2021 was accessed to identify SSTs in which the resection included removal of at least part of the vertebral body. All patients were staged using fluorodeox-yglucose positron emission tomography (/computed tomography), computed tomography scan of the chest/upper abdomen, and brain imaging. Surgical morbidity was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Overall and disease-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method.Results: A total of 18 patients were included: 8 complete and 10 partial vertebrectomies were performed, with six of the eight complete vertebrectomies involving two vertebral levels, resulting in Complete surgical resection (R0) in 94%. Nine patients had a 1-day procedure, and nine were staged over 2 days. The median follow-up was 30 months (inter quartile range 11-57). The 90-day postoperative morbidity was 44% (grade III/IV), with no 90-day surgery-related mortality. There were 83% who had a major pathologic response, associated with improved survival (p 1/4 0.044). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 55% and 40%, respectively. Disease progression occurred in 10 patients, comprising locoregional recurrences in two and distant metastases in eight patients.Conclusions: Multimodality treatment in selected patients with a superior sulcus tumor invading the spine is safe and results in good survival. Such patients should be referred to expert centers. Future research should focus on improving distant control (e.g. [neo]adjuvant immunotherapy).(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
Purpose: It remains unclear whether the long-term results of RCTs regarding the outcome of microdiscectomy for lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LSRS) are generalizable. The purpose of this study was... Show morePurpose: It remains unclear whether the long-term results of RCTs regarding the outcome of microdiscectomy for lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LSRS) are generalizable. The purpose of this study was to determine the external validity of the outcome preseneted in RCTs after microdicectomy for LSRS in a patient cohort from a high-volume spine center. Methods: Between 2007 and 2010, 539 patients had a single level microdiscectomy for MRI disk-related LSRS of whom 246 agreed to participate. Questionnaires included visual analogue scores (VAS) for leg pain, RDQ, OLBD, RAND-36 and Likert scores for recovery, leg and back pain. Lumbar re-operation(s) were registered. Results: Mean age was 51.3, and median time of follow-up was 8.0 years. Re-operation occurred in 64 (26%) patients. Unfavorable perceived recovery was noted in 85 (35%) patients, and they had worse leg and back pain than the 161 (65%) patients with a favorable recovery: median VAS for leg pain 28/100 mm versus 2/100 mm and median VAS for back pain 9/100 mm versus 3/100 mm, respectively. In addition, the median RDQ and OLBD scores differed significantly: 9 vs 3 for RDQ and 26 vs 4 for OLBD, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this cohort study, the long-term results after microdiscectomy for LSRS were less favorable than those obtained in RCTs, possibly caused by less strict patient selection than in RCTs. Our findings emphasize that patients, who do not meet the same inclusion criteria for surgery as in RCTs, should be informed about the chances of a less favorable result. Show less
Depreitere, B.; Ricciardi, F.; Arts, M.; Balabaud, L.; Bunger, C.; Buchowski, J.M.; ... ; Choi, D. 2020
Background The benefits of surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases have been demonstrated, largely based on series of patients undergoing debulking and instrumentation operations. However, as... Show moreBackground The benefits of surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases have been demonstrated, largely based on series of patients undergoing debulking and instrumentation operations. However, as cancer treatments improve and overall survival lengths increase, the incidence of recurrent spinal cord compression after debulking may increase. The aim of the current paper is to document the postoperative evolution of neurological function, pain, and quality of life following debulking and instrumentation in the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) database. Methods The GSTSG database is a prospective multicenter data repository of consecutive patients that underwent surgery for a symptomatic spinal metastasis. For the present analysis, patients were selected from the database that underwent decompressive debulking surgery with instrumentation. Preoperative tumor type, Tomita and Tokuhashi scores, EQ-5D, Frankel, Karnofsky, and postoperative complications, survival, EQ-5D, Frankel, Karnofsky, and pain numeric rating scores (NRS) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were analyzed. Results A total of 914 patients underwent decompressive debulking surgery with instrumentation and had documented follow-up until death or until 2 years post surgery. Median preoperative Karnofsky performance index was 70. A total of 656 patients (71.8%) had visceral metastases and 490 (53.6%) had extraspinal bone metastases. Tomita scores were evenly distributed above (49.1%) and below or equal to 5 (50.9%), and Tokuhashi scores almost evenly distributed below or equal to 8 (46.3%) and above 8 (53.7%). Overall, 12-month survival after surgery was 56.3%. The surgery resulted in EQ-5D health status improvement and NRS pain reduction that was maintained throughout follow-up. Frankel scores improved at first follow-up in 25.0% of patients, but by 12 months neurological deterioration was observed in 18.8%. Conclusion We found that palliative debulking and instrumentation surgeries were performed throughout all Tomita and Tokuhashi categories. These surgeries reduced pain scores and improved quality of life up to 2 years after surgery. After initial improvement, a proportion of patients experienced neurological deterioration by 1 year, but the majority of patients remained stable. Show less
PurposeTo evaluate technical success and long-term outcome of CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of spinal osteoid osteomas (OO) and osteoblastomas (OB) in six different European centres... Show morePurposeTo evaluate technical success and long-term outcome of CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of spinal osteoid osteomas (OO) and osteoblastomas (OB) in six different European centres.MethodsEighty-seven patients with spinal OO (77) or OB (10) were treated with CT-guided RFA, after three-dimensional CT-guided access planning. Patient's long-term outcome was assessed by clinical examination and questionnaire-based evaluation including 10-point visual analogue scales (VAS) regarding the effect of RFA on severity of pain and limitations of daily activities. Clinical success was defined as a reduction of >30% in the VAS score and patient's satisfaction.ResultsOverall, RFA was technically successful in 82/87 cases (94.3%) with no major complications; clinical success was achieved in 78/87 cases (89.7%). The OO/OB were localized in the cervical (n=9/3), the thoracic (n=27/1), the lumbar (n=29/4), and the sacral spine (n=12/2). A decrease in severity of pain after RFA was observed in 86/87 patients (98.9%) with a persistent mean reduction of overall pain score from 8.040.96 to 1.46 +/- 1.95 (p<0.001) after a median follow-up time of 29.35 +/- 35.59months. VAS scores significantly decreased for limitations of both daily (5.70 +/- 2.73 to 0.67 +/- 1.61, p<0.001) and sports activities (6.40 +/- 2.58 to 0.67 +/- 1.61, p<0.001).Conclusion In a multicentric setting, this trial proves RFA to be a safe and efficient method to treat spinal OO/OB and should be regarded as first-line therapy after interdisciplinary case discussion. Show less
Depreitere, B.; Ricciardi, F.; Arts, M.; Balabaud, L.; Buchowski, J.M.; Bunger, C.; ... ; Choi, D. 2018
Unilateral transflaval microdiscectomy is the golden standard for surgical treatment of lumbar disc related sciatica to which all new techniques should be compared. Minimally invasive tubular... Show moreUnilateral transflaval microdiscectomy is the golden standard for surgical treatment of lumbar disc related sciatica to which all new techniques should be compared. Minimally invasive tubular discectomy has been popularised aiming at reduced muscle trauma, less postoperative low-back pain, shorter hospitalisation and faster resumption of work and daily activities. This thesis outlines the results of a double-blind multicentre trial in which tubular discectomy (166 patients) was compared with unilateral transflaval microdiscectomy (159 patients). Use of tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy did not result in a statistically significant functional improvement as measured by the Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica. The median time until complete recovery was 2 weeks, irrespective of the allocated surgical treatment. Both groups reported relief of leg pain and low-back pain, although the differences favoured the conventional microsurgery group. However, these differences were small and not clinically relevant. At 2 years after surgery, 71% of patients who underwent tubular discectomy versus 77% of those treated with conventional surgery reported complete recovery. Cost-utility analysis showed no significant difference between tubular discectomy and conventional microdiscectomy. In conclusion, the data of this trial did not support a superior outcome of tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy. Show less
The frequently diagnosed lumbar disc herniation can disappear by natural course, but still leads to high low back surgery rates. The optimal period of conservative care, before surgery is executed,... Show moreThe frequently diagnosed lumbar disc herniation can disappear by natural course, but still leads to high low back surgery rates. The optimal period of conservative care, before surgery is executed, was unknown. It is surprising that scientific evidence was lacking which justified “early” surgery. Surgery, after 6-12 weeks of sciatica, was compared to prolonged conservative care in 283 patients in a randomized study. Primary outcomes were perceived recovery, leg pain intensity and functioning. Early surgery resulted in a 2 times faster recovery rate, compared to prolonged conservative care. From the latter group 39 percent of patients could not evade surgery. Within one year, however, both groups presented similar recovery rates and outcome. The impossibility to sit, because of sciatica, seemed to be a good argument to decide for early surgery. Intense pain and disability were predictors for delayed surgery. Compared to men, females exhibited a 3 times higher odds to develop chronic pain. The higher medical costs of early surgery were fully compensated by quick resumption of working capacity. From a medical point of view one may favor a prolonged wait-and-see strategy but our western society urges patients to decide for early surgery to resume daily activities. Show less
