Background and purpose: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the... Show moreBackground and purpose: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. Results: The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79-2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40-0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40-1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67-1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76-1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48-1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63-1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79-1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52-1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63-1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14-2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80-1.19). Conclusions: Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death.[GRAPHICS]. Show less
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the first choice thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients who do not have a high risk of bleeding. In addition to the anticoagulant effects,... Show moreBackground: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the first choice thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients who do not have a high risk of bleeding. In addition to the anticoagulant effects, potential anti-tumor effects of DOACs have also been studied in animal cancer models. In this study, we summarize the effects of DOACs on cancer growth and metastasis in animal models through a systematic review with a qualitative analysis.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were systematically searched for original studies that describe animal models of cancer in which one of the experimental groups received DOAC monotherapy, and which reported quantitatively on primary tumor or metastases.Results: Nine studies - reporting a total of 19 animal experiments - met the inclusion criteria. These 19 experiments included spontaneous cancer (n = 2), carcinogenicity (n = 2), xenograft (n = 7) and syngeneic (n = 8) models, encompassing orthotopic (n = 7), subcutaneous (n = 5), intraperitoneal (n = 1) and intravenous (n = 2) injection of cancer cells and included treatments with the DOACs ximelagatran (n = 4), dabigatran etexilate (n = 6) and/or rivaroxaban (n = 11). DOAC treatment decreased tumor growth at implanted and metastatic site in 18.8% (3/16) and 20.0% (3/15) of the experiments, respectively. Conversely, DOACs increased tumor growth at implanted and metastatic site in 6.3% (1/16) and 20.0% (3/15) of the experiments, respectively.Conclusion: DOAC monotherapy resulted in neoplastic changes in a rat carcinogenicity study, showed a lack of effect in mouse xenograft models, while the effect on cancer growth and metastasis in mouse syngeneic models depended on the timing of DOAC treatment and type of cancer model used. Show less
Factor Xa‐targeting DOACs were recently found to reduce recurrentVTE efficiently in cancer patients when compared to the standard treatment withlow‐molecular‐weight heparins (LMWHs). While the... Show moreFactor Xa‐targeting DOACs were recently found to reduce recurrentVTE efficiently in cancer patients when compared to the standard treatment withlow‐molecular‐weight heparins (LMWHs). While the anticancer effects of LMWHshave been extensively studied in preclinical cancer models, the effects of FXa‐targetingDOACs on cancer progression remain to be studied.We investigated whether the FXa‐targeting DOAC rivaroxaban and thethrombin‐targeting DOAC dabigatran etexilate (DE) affected human breast cancergrowth and metastasis in orthotopic xenograft models.Mice that were put on a custom‐made chow diet supplementedwith rivaroxaban (0.4 or 1.0 mg/g diet) or dabigatran etexilate (DE) (10 mg/g diet)showed prolonged ex vivo coagulation times (prothrombin time [PT] and activatedpartial thromboplastin time [aPTT] assay, respectively). However, rivaroxabanand DE did not inhibit MDA‐MB‐231 tumor growth and metastasis formationin lungs or livers of 7‐week‐old fully immunodeficient NOD/SCID/ƴC−/− (NSG) mice.Comparable data were obtained for rivaroxaban‐treated mice when using NOD‐SCIDmice. Rivaroxaban and DE treatment also did not significantly inhibit tumor growthand metastasis formation when using another human triple negative breast cancer(TNBC) cell line (HCC1806) in NOD‐SCID mice. The FXa and thrombin‐induced geneexpression of the downstream target CXCL8 in both cell lines, but FXa and thrombin,did not significantly stimulate migration, proliferation, or stemness in vitro.Although effectively inhibiting coagulation, the DOACs rivaroxaban andDE did not inhibit orthotopic growth and metastasis of human TNBC. It remains to beinvestigated whether DOACs exert antitumorigenic effects in other types of cancer. Show less
