The primary objective of this thesis is to investigate the role of pharmacogenetics in predicting drug response in treatments for the autoimmune diseases: RA and SLE. For this reason, this thesis... Show moreThe primary objective of this thesis is to investigate the role of pharmacogenetics in predicting drug response in treatments for the autoimmune diseases: RA and SLE. For this reason, this thesis is divided in two parts: pharmacogenetics related with drugs used in RA and pharmacogenetics of rituximab used in SLE and other autoimmune diseases. Part 1: Pharmacogenetics of drugs used in RA MTX is the most common DMARD used in RA. However, its use is hampered by frequent adverse drug events among which gastrointestinal toxicity is most frequent. Hepatotoxicity is a relatively rare but serious adverse event related to the use of MTX and is largely unpredictable. In chapter 2 an overview is presented of the previously performed studies concerning pharmacogenetic predictive biomarkers for MTX-induced hepatotoxicity. Treatment with anti-TNF agents results in a reduction of disease activity in most RA patients. However, a substantial part of patients does not respond to this therapy for unknown reasons. It would be highly beneficial to be able to predict whether or not an individual patient responds to treatment. Chapters 4 and 5 describe the investigations on the role of different candidate SNPs related to the efficacy of the treatment with different anti-TNFs in RA. In addition, in chapter 3 a replication study is presented based on 4 polymorphisms that were found associated with anti-TNF response in RA in a previously published genomewide association study. Part 2: Pharmacogenetics of rituximab used in SLE and other autoimmune diseases In chapters 6–8 the role of different genetic variants related to the pharmacodynamics of the drug or of the diseases are evaluated to study the contribution to differences in the response to rituximab in patients with SLE and other systemic autoimmune diseases. In chapter 6, the possible involvement of the -174 IL-6 polymorphism in the clinical response to rituximab in different systemic autoimmune diseases is assessed. In chapter 7, the aim is to investigate the possible involvement of the FCGR3A-158F/V polymorphism in the clinical response to rituximab in Spanish patients with different systemic autoimmune diseases. In chapter 8, the role of G/T polymorphism at the IL2–IL21 region in the rituximab response in a cohort of SLE patient and different autoimmune disorders is analyzed. Chapter 9 provides a summary of this thesis, chapter 10 the Dutch summary (Nederlandse samenvatting), and chapter 11 the general discussion and future perspective of this thesis. Show less
Objectives To study whether there is an association between body mass index (BMI) category and survival of various tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in... Show moreObjectives To study whether there is an association between body mass index (BMI) category and survival of various tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-life longitudinal international registry.Methods Data from 5230 patients with RA starting treatment with any TNFi were selected from the METEOR registry. Patients were divided into six BMI categories: 3.7% underweight, BMI<18.5 kg/m(2); 46% normal weight, BMI 18.5-25 kg/m(2); 32% pre-obesity, BMI 25-30 kg/m(2); 13% obesity class I, BMI 30-35 kg/m(2); 3.4% obesity class II, BMI 35-40 kg/m(2); and 1.6% obesity class III, BMI >40 kg/m(2). Time on treatment in the different BMI categories was compared for all TNFi combined and for the infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept separately, using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses. Cox regression analyses were adjusted for potential confounders, with follow-up censored at 5000 days.Results Patients in obesity class II (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.54) and III (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.18) and underweight patients (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.58) showed statistically significantly shorter TNFi survival than normal weight patients. The effect in underweight patients was strongest for infliximab (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.76), the effect in overweight patients was strongest for infliximab (category II (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.26); category III (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.71)) and etanercept (category II (HR 1.27 95% CI 0.98 to 1.65); category III (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.55)). No significant effect modification from reported pain was found.Conclusion Both underweight and overweight patients discontinued TNFi treatment earlier than normal weight patients, without evidence of reported pain as the main determinant. It remains uncertain what determines TNFi survival in individual patients. Show less
