Background: Bilateral hands including proximal interphalangeal joints (PIPJs) are recommended on physical, X-ray radiographic, or ultrasonographic examination by clinical guidelines of rheumatoid... Show moreBackground: Bilateral hands including proximal interphalangeal joints (PIPJs) are recommended on physical, X-ray radiographic, or ultrasonographic examination by clinical guidelines of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but MRI still tends to examine unilateral wrists and/or MCPJs. We aimed to demonstrate the advantages of MRI examination on bilateral hands including PIPJs for disease assessment in early RA patients.Methods: Active early RA patients received 3.0T whole-body MRI examination with contrast-enhanced imaging on bilateral wrists, MCPJs, and PIPJs. MRI features were scored referring to the updated RAMRIS. Clinical assessments were conducted on the day of MRI examination.Results: The mean time of MRI examination was 24 +/- 3 min. MRI bone erosion in MCPJs would be missed-diagnosed in 23% of patients if non-dominant MCPJs were scanned unilaterally, while osteitis in MCPJs would be missed-diagnosed in 16% of patients if dominant MCPJs were scanned unilaterally. MRI synovitis severity was also asymmetric: 21% of patients showing severe synovitis unilaterally in non-dominant MCPJs/PIPJs and other 20% showing severe synovitis unilaterally in dominant MCPJs/PIPJs. Among these early RA patients, MRI tenosynovitis occurred the most frequently in wrist extensor compartment I, while MRI examination on bilateral hands demonstrated no overuse influence present. However, overuse should be considered in dominant PIPJ2, PIPJ4, and IPJ of thumb of which MRI tenosynovitis prevalence was respectively 18%, 17%, or 16% higher than the nondominant counterparts. Early MRI abnormality of nervus medianus secondary to severe tenosynovitis occurred either in dominant or non-dominant wrists; MRI of unilateral hands would take a risk of missed-diagnosis. Common MRI findings in PIPJs were synovitis and tenosynovitis, respectively in 87% and 69% of patients. MRI tenosynovitis prevalence in IPJ of thumb or PIPJ5 was much higher than the continued wrist flexor compartments. MRI synovitis or tenosynovitis in PIPJs independently increased more than twice probability of joint tenderness (OR = 2.09 or 2.83, both p < 0.001).Conclusions: In consideration of asymmetric MRI features in early RA, potential overuse influence for certain tenosynovitis in dominant hands, and high prevalence of MRI findings in PIPJs, MRI examination on bilateral hands including PIPJs is deserved for disease assessment in early RA patients. Show less
Al-Laith, M.; Jasenecova, M.; Abraham, S.; Bosworth, A.; Bruce, I.N.; Buckley, C.D.; ... ; Cope, A.P. 2019
Trial designWe present a study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial that seeks to test the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of... Show moreTrial designWe present a study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial that seeks to test the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a 52-week period of treatment with the first-in-class co-stimulatory blocker abatacept for preventing or delaying the onset of inflammatory arthritis.MethodsThe study aimed to recruit 206 male or female subjects from the secondary care hospital setting across the UK and the Netherlands. Participants who were at least 18 years old, who reported inflammatory sounding joint pain (clinically suspicious arthralgia) and who were found to be positive for serum autoantibodies associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were eligible for enrolment. All study subjects were randomly assigned to receive weekly injections of investigational medicinal product, either abatacept or placebo treatment over the course of a 52-week period. Participants were followed up for a further 52weeks. The primary endpoint was defined as the time to development of at least three swollen joints or to the fulfilment of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for RA using swollen but not tender joints, whichever endpoint was met first. In either case, swollen joints were confirmed by ultrasonography. Participants, care givers, and those assessing the outcomes were all blinded to group assignment. Clinical assessors and ultrasonographers were also blinded to each other's assessments for the duration of the study.ConclusionsThere is limited experience of the design and implementation of trials for the prevention of inflammatory joint diseases. We discuss the rationale behind choice and duration of treatment and the challenges associated with defining the at risk state and offer pragmatic solutions in the protocol to enrolling subjects at risk of RA.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN46017566. Registered on 4 July 2014. Show less
BackgroundFoot orthoses (FOs) are prescribed as an important conservative treatment option in patients with foot problems related to rheumatoid arthritis. However, a broad variation in FOs is used,... Show moreBackgroundFoot orthoses (FOs) are prescribed as an important conservative treatment option in patients with foot problems related to rheumatoid arthritis. However, a broad variation in FOs is used, both in clinical practice and in research. To date, there is no overview on the outcomes of the treatment with different kinds of FOs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a specific foot problem. The objectives of the present study were to summarize the comparative effectiveness of FOs in the treatment of various foot problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, on the primary outcomes foot function and foot pain, and the secondary outcomes physical functioning, health related quality of life, compliance, adverse events, the costs of FOs and patient satisfaction.MethodsStudies comparing different kinds of FOs, with a presumed therapeutic effect, in the treatment of foot problems related to rheumatoid arthritis were included. A literature search was conducted in The Cochrane Central Registry for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE and PEDro up to May 18th, 2018. Data was meta-analyzed, when this was not possible qualitative data analysis was performed.ResultsTen studies were identified, with a total number of 235 patients. These studies made a comparison between different materials used (soft versus semi-rigid), types of FOs (custom-made versus ready-made; total-contact versus non-total contact), or modifications applied (metatarsal bars versus domes). Also, different techniques to construct custom-made FOs were compared (standard custom-molding techniques versus more sophisticated techniques). A medium effect for (immediate) reduction of forefoot plantar pressure was found in favor of treatment with soft FOs compared to semi-rigid FOs (SMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.07-1.14; P=0.03; 28 participants). Other comparisons between FOs resulted in non-significant effects or inconclusive evidence for one kind of FOs over the other.ConclusionsFoot orthoses made of soft materials may lead to more (immediate) forefoot plantar pressure reduction compared to foot orthoses constructed of semi-rigid materials. Definitive high quality RCTs, with adequate sample sizes and long-term follow-up, are needed to investigate the comparative (cost-) effectiveness of different kinds of foot orthoses for the treatment of foot problems related to rheumatoid arthritis. Show less
Purpose To investigate the validity of comparisons across patients with different musculoskeletal disorders and persons from the general population by evaluating differential item functioning (DIF)... Show morePurpose To investigate the validity of comparisons across patients with different musculoskeletal disorders and persons from the general population by evaluating differential item functioning (DIF) for the PROMIS physical function (PROMIS-PF), pain interference (PROMIS-PI), and pain behavior (PROMIS-PB) item banks.Methods Patients with chronic pain, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or osteoarthritis (OA); patients receiving physiotherapy (PT); and persons from the Dutch general population completed the full Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-PF (121-items), PROMIS-PI (40-items), or PROMIS-PB (39-items) banks. DIF was assessed with ordinal logistic regression models and McFadden's pseudo R-2-change of >= 2% as critical value. The impact of DIF on item scores and the T-scores per bank was examined by inspecting item characteristic curves (ICCs) and test characteristic curves (TCCs).Results 2762 patients with chronic pain, 2029 with RA, 1247 with OA, 805 receiving PT, and 1310 healthy persons participated. For the PROMIS-PF, 25 out of 121 items were flagged for DIF, of which 10 items were flagged in multiple comparisons. For the PROMIS-PI, only 2 out of 40 items were flagged for DIF and for the PROMIS-PB, only 3 out of 39 items. Most DIF items had R-2 values just above the critical value of 2% and all showed uniform DIF. The ICCs and TCCs showed that the magnitude and impact of DIF on the item and T-scores were negligible.Conclusions This study supports the universal applicability of PROMIS across (patient) populations. Comparisons across patients with different musculoskeletal disorders and persons from the general population are valid, when applying the PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-PI, and PROMIS-PB banks. Show less
Inflammatory arthritis comprises a group of diseases in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues. Two prevalent types of inflammatory arthritis are rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and... Show moreInflammatory arthritis comprises a group of diseases in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues. Two prevalent types of inflammatory arthritis are rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Clinical research points to the importance of early diagnosis, as treatment in early disease stages increases chances of better outcome and improved quality of life for patients. To this end, the diagnostic potential of imaging modalities sensitive to local inflammation, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is of great interest. The goal of this thesis was to develop computer-aided methods for assessment of MRI-detected inflammation with the aim of aiding early diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. In particular, we focused on the tasks of comparative visualization, automatic quantification, and feature selection. The presented studies showcase the potential of comparative visualization and automatic quantification to overcome the limitations of visual scoring and lay out a fertile ground for future improvements. Additionally, the understanding of the diagnostic role of individual inflammatory features in prediction of RA development is further advanced. Collectively, these findings can help facilitate the use of MRI for early diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis and potentially increase chances of better outcome and quality of life for patients. Show less
Moel, E.C. de; Derksen, V.F.A.M.; Trouw, L.A.; Bang, H.; Collee, G.; Lard, L.R.; ... ; Woude, D. van der 2019
Although quite some data is available on anti-CarP antibodies, several questions remain unanswered, including the reproducibility of the clinical data on anti-CarP antibodies, such as their... Show moreAlthough quite some data is available on anti-CarP antibodies, several questions remain unanswered, including the reproducibility of the clinical data on anti-CarP antibodies, such as their presence before disease onset and association with joint damage. It is also unknown whether these findings can be expanded to non-caucasian populations. Furthermore, it is unclear how anti-CarP antibodies are induced, what proteins they recognize, whether they are able to recognize multiple carbamylated proteins and what the characteristics of these autoantibodies are. Here, some of these questions will be answered. In this thesis, I will first discuss the clinical implications of the presence of anti-CarP antibodies compared to RA-specific autoantibodies in both RA patients other relevant conditions (chapters 2 till 7). This is followed by more detailed investigations into the characteristics of anti-CarP antibodies and their antigens (chapters 8 till 12). Show less
Koppejan, H.; Jansen, D.T.S.L.; Hameetman, M.; Thomas, R.; Toes, R.E.M.; Gaalen, F.A. van 2019
In this thesis we aimed to investigate ways to optimize treatment strategies and the choice of treatment for individual patients, to be implemented in a worldwide context. Although major advances... Show moreIn this thesis we aimed to investigate ways to optimize treatment strategies and the choice of treatment for individual patients, to be implemented in a worldwide context. Although major advances have been made in the treatment of RA, it is still uncertain which treatment is the best choice for each individual patient. This can result in both overtreatment and undertreatment, increasing the burden of RA for patients as well as for society. In clinical trials and daily practice there appears to be a development towards earlier treatment, with higher dosages of medication and more stringent treatment targets. In part 1 of this thesis, some of these developments were investigated and challenged. In countries across the world, patients do not benefit similarly from recent advances in the treatment of RA. In part 2 of this thesis, we aimed to identify contributing factors to inequalities in access to treatment and care and clinical outcomes across countries, as a first step towards improvement. Show less
Background: The presence of autoantibodies is considered an important characteristic of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, both anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor ... Show moreBackground: The presence of autoantibodies is considered an important characteristic of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); therefore, both anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are included in the 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a considerable number of RA patients lack both these autoantibodies. Recently, several novel autoantibodies have been identified but their value for the classification of RA patients is unclear. Therefore, we studied the value of novel autoantibodies using the presence of anticarbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies as an example for predicting RA development in patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA).Methods: There were 1352 UA patients included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) cohort according to the 1987 criteria. When the 2010 criteria were used, there were 838 UA patients. Of these, we evaluated whether they fulfilled the 1987 or 2010 criteria after 1 year, respectively. Logistic regression analyses were performed with RA as outcome and ACPA, RF, and anti-CarP antibodies as predictors. Analyses were repeated after stratification for ACPA and RF.Results: Thirty-three percent of the 1987-UA patients and 6% of the 2010-UA patients progressed to RA during the first year of follow-up. For the 1987-UA patients, anti-CarP antibodies were associated with progression to RA, an association which remained when a correction was made for the presence of ACPA and RF (odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.4). After stratification for ACPA and RF, anti-CarP antibodies were associated with progression to RA only for ACPA- and RF-negative patients (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.7). For the 2010-UA patients, anti-CarP antibodies were associated with progression to RA; however, they were not when a correction was made for the presence of ACPA and RF (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.3-2.1).Conclusions: Our finding that anti-CarP antibodies have no additional value when RA is defined according to the 2010 criteria might be inherent to the composition of the 2010 criteria and therefore might also apply to other novel autoantibodies. Potentially it would be interesting to evaluate other, non-autoantibody biomarkers. Show less
Boeters, D.M.; Trouw, L.A.; Helm-Van Mil, A.H.M. van der; Steenbergen, H.W. van 2018
