This thesis aims to improve the treatment of patients with stage III melanoma. The first part describes different aspects of treatment with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC), a genetically modified... Show moreThis thesis aims to improve the treatment of patients with stage III melanoma. The first part describes different aspects of treatment with Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC), a genetically modified herpes virus, which is used as oncolytic immunotherapy for skin and lymph node metastases in melanoma patients. We show that patients with a low tumor burden have the best outcomes, suggesting T-VEC should be used earlier on in the course of the disease. We present a prediction model, allowing a more accurate selection of patients for T-VEC monotherapy. Two studies focused on the use of T-VEC in clinical practice and the results allowed us to make recommendations on the use of PET/CT and dermoscopy during T-VEC treatment. Part two focuses on the value of surveillance and screening imaging in high-risk melanoma patients. We show that FDG-PET/CT is a valuable imaging tool to detect recurrence after complete resection of stage III disease, even shortly after surgery (before starting adjuvant therapy). Finally, we conclude that nodal staging with US as adjunct to SLNB is useful in the work- up of stage IIB/C melanoma, as it can lead to alterations in treatment and prevent unnecessary surgery. Show less
Neve, O.M.; Benthem, P.P.G. van; Stiggelbout, A.M.; Hensen, E.F. 2021
Background Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) are subjective outcomes of disease and/or treatment in clinical research. For effective evaluations of PROs, high response rates are crucial. This study... Show moreBackground Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) are subjective outcomes of disease and/or treatment in clinical research. For effective evaluations of PROs, high response rates are crucial. This study assessed the impact of the delivery method on the patients' response rate. Methods A cohort of patients with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma (a condition with substantial impact on quality of life, requiring prolonged follow-up) was assigned to three delivery methods: email, regular mail, and hybrid. Patients were matched for age and time since the last visit to the outpatient clinic. The primary outcome was the response rate, determinants other than delivery mode were age, education and time since the last consultation. In addition, the effect of a second reminder by telephone was evaluated. Results In total 602 patients participated in this study. The response rates for delivery by email, hybrid, and mail were 45, 58 and 60%, respectively. The response rates increased after a reminder by telephone to 62, 67 and 64%, respectively. A lower response rate was associated with lower level of education and longer time interval since last outpatient clinic visit. Conclusion The response rate for PRO varies by delivery method. PRO surveys by regular mail yield the highest response rate, followed by hybrid and email delivery methods. Hybrid delivery combines good response rates with the ease of digitally returned questionnaires. Show less
