The studies in this thesis contribute to more accurate risk assessment and prognosis prediction for DCIS and to better response evaluation of IBC treatment.For the Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)... Show moreThe studies in this thesis contribute to more accurate risk assessment and prognosis prediction for DCIS and to better response evaluation of IBC treatment.For the Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) studies, unbiased cohorts were used within the international Grand Challenge PRECISION consortium, funded by Cancer Research UK and KWF Dutch Cancer Society. DCIS is graded as low-, intermediate-, or high-grade depending on how abnormal the DCIS-cells look like. However, we showed that pathologists often disagree on grade. To overcome this limitation, we found that almost all DCIS scored as non-high-grade by the majority of pathologists express the estrogen receptor (ER) and are negative for the growth factor receptor HER2, whereas high-grade DCIS is mixed in expression for ER and HER2. We also provided insights in the recurrence risks of DCIS after treatment. See also https://cancergrandchallenges.org/teams/precision.The studies on Invasive Breast Cancer (IBC) were performed on a hospital-based cohort. We found for example substantial variation in tumour response evaluation for HER2-positive IBC after pre-operative chemotherapy due to different guidelines used. For accurate outcome analysis, reducing such variation is mandatory. Therefore, we are working on reaching international consensus of response evaluation. Show less
