Background An increasing number of subjects are recovering from COVID-19, raising the need for tools to adequately assess the course of the disease and its impact on functional status. We aimed to... Show moreBackground An increasing number of subjects are recovering from COVID-19, raising the need for tools to adequately assess the course of the disease and its impact on functional status. We aimed to assess the construct validity of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) Scale among adult subjects with confirmed and presumed COVID-19. Methods Adult subjects with confirmed and presumed COVID-19, who were members of an online panel and two Facebook groups for subjects with COVID-19 with persistent symptoms, completed an online survey after the onset of infection-related symptoms. The number and intensity of symptoms were evaluated with the Utrecht Symptom Diary, health-related quality of life (HrQoL) with the 5-level EQ-5D questionnaire, impairment in work and activities with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire and functional status with the PCFS Scale. Results 1939 subjects were included in the analyses (85% women, 95% non-hospitalized during infection) about 3 months after the onset of infection-related symptoms. Subjects classified as experiencing 'slight', 'moderate' and 'severe' functional limitations presented a gradual increase in the number/intensity of symptoms, reduction of HrQoL and impairment in work and usual activities. No differences were found regarding the number and intensity of symptoms, HrQoL and impairment in work and usual activities between subjects classified as experiencing 'negligible' and 'no' functional limitations. We found weak-to-strong statistical associations between functional status and all domains of HrQoL (r: 0.233-0.661). Notably, the strongest association found was with the 'usual activities' domain of the 5-level EQ-5D questionnaire. Conclusion We demonstrated the construct validity of the PCFS Scale in highly-symptomatic adult subjects with confirmed and presumed COVID-19, 3 months after the onset of symptoms. Show less
Bruijnen, C.P.; Groot, L.G.R. de; Vondeling, A.M.; Bree, R. de; Bos, F. van den; Witteveen, P.O.; Emmelot-Vonk, M.H. 2021
Introduction: In addition to classical endpoints such as survival and complication rates, other outcomes such as quality of life and functional status are increasingly recognized as important... Show moreIntroduction: In addition to classical endpoints such as survival and complication rates, other outcomes such as quality of life and functional status are increasingly recognized as important endpoints, especially for elderly patients. However, little is known about the long-term effect of surgery with regard to these other outcomes. Our aim is to investigate the functional status and self-reported health status of patients > 70 years one year after surgery for head and neck cancer. Methods: We present one-year follow-up data of patients > 70 year who underwent surgery for HNC. During an interview by telephone, functional status was evaluated by using the Katz-15 Index of Independence questionnaire including six items covering basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and nine items covering Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). Measurements were compared with those obtained preoperatively. Results: In total, 126 patients were included and eventually we collected follow-up data of 68 patients. There was a statistically significant decrease in functional status on the total Katz-15 and on the IADL questionnaire scores one year after surgery (mean 1.34 versus 2.42, p -value 0.00 and mean 1.21 versus 1.94, p- value 0.00). There was no significant change concerning ADL dependence ( p -value 0.18) and cognitive status ( p -value 0.11). The self-reported health status improved postoperatively, although not statistically significantly so (mean 67.36 versus 71.25, p -value 0.12). Conclusion: Approximately-one year after surgery for HNC, there is a significant decline in functional status indicating a higher level of dependency. Show less
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, A.I.; Meid, A.D.; Dinh, T.S.; Blom, J.W.; Akker, M. van den; Elders, P.J.M.; ... ; Muth, C. 2021
Objectives: To develop and validate a prognostic model to predict deterioration in health-related quality of life (dHRQoL) in older general practice patients with at least one chronic condition and... Show moreObjectives: To develop and validate a prognostic model to predict deterioration in health-related quality of life (dHRQoL) in older general practice patients with at least one chronic condition and one chronic prescription.Study Design and Setting: We used individual participant data from five cluster-randomized trials conducted in the Netherlands and Germany to predict dHRQoL, defined as a decrease in EQ-5D-3 L index score of > 5% after 6-month follow-up in logistic regression models with stratified intercepts to account for between-study heterogeneity. The model was validated internally and by using internal -external cross-validation (IECV).Results: In 3,582 patients with complete data, of whom 1,046 (29.2%) showed deterioration in HRQoL, and 12/87 variables were selected that were related to single (chronic) conditions, inappropriate medication, medication underuse, functional status, well-being, and HRQoL. Bootstrap internal validation showed a C-statistic of 0.71 (0.69 to 0.72) and a calibration slope of 0.88 (0.78 to 0.98). In the IECV loop, the model provided a pooled C-statistic of 0.68 (0.65 to 0.70) and calibration-in-the-large of 0 (-0.13 to 0.13). HRQoL/functionality had the strongest prognostic value.Conclusion: The model performed well in terms of discrimination, calibration, and generalizability and might help clinicians identify older patients at high risk of dHRQoL.Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42018088129. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Show less
Introduction: Approximately 20% of older patients with breast cancer either present with metastatic disease or develop distant metastases after early breast cancer. The aims of this study were to... Show moreIntroduction: Approximately 20% of older patients with breast cancer either present with metastatic disease or develop distant metastases after early breast cancer. The aims of this study were to assess the prevalence of psychosocial problems in older patients with metastatic breast cancer, and to assess longitudinal changes in functional status, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life.Methods: For this prospective cohort study, patients with metastatic breast cancer aged 70 years and older were recruited in four Dutch hospitals. A baseline geriatric assessment was performed evaluating somatic, functional and psychosocial domains. Self-administered questionnaires were performed at baseline, three and six months: the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale. Loneliness scale, Apathy scale, Distress Thermometer and EORTC-QLQ-C30. Longitudinal changes on these scales were assessed by performing crude and adjusted linear mixed models.Results: Of the 100 patients that were included and underwent a geriatric assessment, 85 patients completed the baseline self-administered questionnaires. Almost half of the patients (46%) had depressive symptoms, and up to 64% experienced distress. Apathy was present in 53%, and 36% experienced loneliness. Three- and six-month questionnaires were completed by 77 and 72 patients, respectively. Although a significant increase in loneliness between baseline and six months was seen, this size of this change was not clinically relevant. No other longitudinal changes were found.Conclusion: The prevalence of distress, depressive symptoms, apathy and loneliness in older patients with metastatic breast cancer is high. Timely detection, for which a geriatric assessment is effective, could potentially improve quality of life. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Show less
