PurposeHeavy pigmentation is known to be a prognostic risk factor in uveal melanoma (UM). We analyzed whether genetic tumor parameters were associated with tumor pigmentation and whether... Show morePurposeHeavy pigmentation is known to be a prognostic risk factor in uveal melanoma (UM). We analyzed whether genetic tumor parameters were associated with tumor pigmentation and whether pigmentation should be included in prognostic tests.DesignRetrospective comparison of clinical, histopathological, and genetic features and survival in UM with different pigmentation.ParticipantsA total of 1058 patients with UM from a White European population with diverse eye colors enucleated between 1972 and 2021.MethodsCox regression and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis; the chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U test were used for correlation analysis.Main Outcome MeasuresUveal melanoma–related survival based on tumor pigmentation and chromosome status, correlation of tumor pigmentation with prognostic factors.ResultsThe 5-year UM-related mortality was 8% in patients with nonpigmented tumors (n = 54), 25% with lightly pigmented tumors (n = 489), 41% with moderately pigmented tumors (n = 333), and 33% with dark tumors (n = 178) (P < 0.001). The percentage of tumors with monosomy 3 (M3) or 8q gain increased with increasing pigmentation (31%, 46%, 62%, and 70% having M3 [P < 0.001], and 19%, 43%, 61%, and 63% having 8q gain [P < 0.001] in the 4 increasing pigment groups, respectively). BRCA-associated protein 1(BAP1) loss (known for 204 cases) was associated with increased tumor pigmentation (P = 0.001). Cox regression analysis on survival showed that when chromosome status and pigmentation were both included, pigmentation was not an independent prognostic indicator. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) expression was a significant prognostic marker in light tumors (P = 0.02) but not in dark tumors (P = 0.85).ConclusionsPatients with moderately and heavily pigmented tumors showed a significantly higher UM-related mortality than patients with unpigmented and light tumors (P < 0.001), supporting prior reports on the relation between increased tumor pigmentation and a worse prognosis. Although we previously showed that a dark eye color was associated with tumor pigmentation, we now show that the tumor’s genetic status (chromosome 3 and 8q/BAP1 status) is also related to tumor pigmentation. When pigmentation and chromosome 3 status are both included in a Cox regression analysis, pigmentation is not an independent prognostic factor. However, evidence from this and previous studies shows that chromosome changes and PRAME expression have a stronger association with survival when they occur in light tumors than in dark ones. Show less
Purpose: Individuals with gray, blue, or green eyes have a higher chance of developing uveal melanoma (UM) than those with brown eyes. We wondered whether iris pigmentation might be related not... Show morePurpose: Individuals with gray, blue, or green eyes have a higher chance of developing uveal melanoma (UM) than those with brown eyes. We wondered whether iris pigmentation might be related not only to predisposition to UM but also to its behavior; therefore, we compared the clinical, histopathologic, and genetic characteristics of UM between eyes with different colors. Design: We determined iris color in a large cohort of patients enucleated for UM. Clinical and histopathologic tumor characteristics, chromosome status, and survival were compared among 3 groups on the basis of iris color. Participants: A total of 412 patients with choroidal/ciliary body UM, who had undergone primary enucleation at the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, between 1993 and 2019, were divided into 3 groups based on iris color: gray/blue, green/hazel, and brown. The validation cohort included 934 patients with choroidal/ciliary body UM treated at Wills Eye Hospital (WEH). Methods: Comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and genetic characteristics of UM in patients with different iris colors. Main Outcome Measures: Melanoma-related survival in UM patients, divided over 3 iris color groups, in relation to the tumor's chromosome 3 and 8q status. Results: Moderate and heavy tumor pigmentations were especially seen in eyes with a brown iris (P < 0.001). Survival did not differ between patients with different iris colors (P = 0.27); however, in patients with a light iris, copy number changes in chromosome 3 and 8q had a greater influence on survival than in patients with a dark iris. Likewise, chromosome 3 and chromosome 8q status affected survival more among patients with lightly pigmented tumors than in patients with heavily pigmented tumors. The WEH cohort similarly showed a greater influence of chromosome aberrations in light-eyed individuals. Conclusions: Although iris color by itself did not relate to UM-related survival, chromosome 3 and 8q aberrations had a larger influence on survival in patients with a light iris than those with a brown iris. This suggests a synergistic effect of iris pigmentation and chromosome status in the regulation of oncogenic behavior of UM. Iris color should be taken into consideration when calculating a patient's risk for developing metastases. (C) 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Show less
Purpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease and the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, with a high risk of metastases. Reliable prognostication systems are based on anatomic... Show morePurpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease and the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, with a high risk of metastases. Reliable prognostication systems are based on anatomic features, as in the tumor-node-metastasis staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system, or on genetic information, as in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) system. Prior evidence suggests that combining both systems may be beneficial. We evaluated the benefit of combining the TCGA and AJCC systems in a large cohort of patients.Design: Retrospective case series of patients with UM.Participants: Nine hundred seventy-nine patients with a choroidal or ciliary body melanoma treated at the Wills Eye Hospital between 1998 and 2020, 94% of whom received eye-sparing treatment.Methods: Tumors were classified into 4 TCGA groups based on chromosome copy number: A (disomy 3, normal 8q), B (disomy 3, any 8q gain), C (monosomy 3, 1 extra copy of 8q), and D (monosomy 3, multiple 8q gain). The eighth edition of the AJCC staging manual was used for AJCC staging. Cox regression and the log-rank test were used for survival analysis.Main Outcome Measure: Metastasis-free survival.Results: Combining information of the 2 systems improved prognostication in intermediate groups: in TCGA group C, we saw an increased rate of metastasis in AJCC stage III (28%) compared with stage 11 (8.9%); the same was seen in AJCC stage II, going from TCGA group C (8.9%) to group D (46%), and in AJCC stage III, going from group C (28%) to group D (49%). In patients with AJCC stage II or III disease, loss of chromosome 3 and gain of 8q (TCGA groups C and D) significantly worsened the prognosis, with multiple 8q gain (TCGA group D) having a greater impact.Conclusions: Combining information from AJCC stages and TCGA groups yields a better predictive power even in this set of relatively small tumors. We propose that physicians take both systems into account whenever possible, especially in moderate-risk groups. (C) 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Show less
