In this study, we analyzed turbulent flows through a phantom (a 180 degrees bend with narrowing) at peak systole and a patient-specific coarctation of the aorta (CoA), with a pulsating flow, using... Show moreIn this study, we analyzed turbulent flows through a phantom (a 180 degrees bend with narrowing) at peak systole and a patient-specific coarctation of the aorta (CoA), with a pulsating flow, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). For MRI, a 4D-flow MRI is performed using a 3T scanner. For CFD, the standard k - epsilon, shear stress transport k - omega, and Reynolds stress (RSM) models are applied. A good agreement between measured and simulated velocity is obtained for the phantom, especially for CFD with RSM. The wall shear stress (WSS) shows significant differences between CFD and MRI in absolute values, due to the limited near-wall resolution of MRI. However, normalized WSS shows qualitatively very similar distributions of the local values between MRI and CFD. Finally, a direct comparison between in vivo 4D-flow MRI and CFD with the RSM turbulence model is performed in the CoA. MRI can properly identify regions with locally elevated or suppressed WSS. If the exact values of the WSS are necessary, CFD is the preferred method. For future applications, we recommend the use of the combined MRI/CFD method for analysis and evaluation of the local flow patterns and WSS in the aorta. Show less
Background The T-1 Mapping and Extracellular volume (ECV) Standardization (T1MES) program explored T-1 mapping quality assurance using a purpose-developed phantom with Food and Drug Administration ... Show moreBackground The T-1 Mapping and Extracellular volume (ECV) Standardization (T1MES) program explored T-1 mapping quality assurance using a purpose-developed phantom with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformite Europeenne (CE) regulatory clearance. We report T-1 measurement repeatability across centers describing sequence, magnet, and vendor performance. Methods Phantoms batch-manufactured in August 2015 underwent 2 years of structural imaging, B-0 and B-1, and "reference" slow T-1 testing. Temperature dependency was evaluated by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology and by the German Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Center-specific T-1 mapping repeatability (maximum one scan per week to minimum one per quarter year) was assessed over mean 358 (maximum 1161) days on 34 1.5 T and 22 3 T magnets using multiple T-1 mapping sequences. Image and temperature data were analyzed semi-automatically. Repeatability of serial T-1 was evaluated in terms of coefficient of variation (CoV), and linear mixed models were constructed to study the interplay of some of the known sources of T-1 variation. Results Over 2 years, phantom gel integrity remained intact (no rips/tears), B-0 and B-1 homogenous, and "reference" T-1 stable compared to baseline (% change at 1.5 T, 1.95 +/- 1.39%; 3 T, 2.22 +/- 1.44%). Per degrees Celsius, 1.5 T, T-1 (MOLLI 5s(3s)3s) increased by 11.4 ms in long native blood tubes and decreased by 1.2 ms in short post-contrast myocardium tubes. Agreement of estimated T-1 times with "reference" T-1 was similar across Siemens and Philips CMR systems at both field strengths (adjusted R-2 ranges for both field strengths, 0.99-1.00). Over 1 year, many 1.5 T and 3 T sequences/magnets were repeatable with mean CoVs < 1 and 2% respectively. Repeatability was narrower for 1.5 T over 3 T. Within T1MES repeatability for native T-1 was narrow for several sequences, for example, at 1.5 T, Siemens MOLLI 5s(3s)3s prototype number 448B (mean CoV = 0.27%) and Philips modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) 3s(3s)5s (CoV 0.54%), and at 3 T, Philips MOLLI 3b(3s)5b (CoV 0.33%) and Siemens shortened MOLLI (ShMOLLI) prototype 780C (CoV 0.69%). After adjusting for temperature and field strength, it was found that the T-1 mapping sequence and scanner software version (both P < 0.001 at 1.5 T and 3 T), and to a lesser extent the scanner model (P = 0.011, 1.5 T only), had the greatest influence on T-1 across multiple centers. Conclusion The T1MES CE/FDA approved phantom is a robust quality assurance device. In a multi-center setting, T-1 mapping had performance differences between field strengths, sequences, scanner software versions, and manufacturers. However, several specific combinations of field strength, sequence, and scanner are highly repeatable, and thus, have potential to provide standardized assessment of T-1 times for clinical use, although temperature correction is required for native T-1 tubes at least. Show less
PurposeSystems for magnetic resonance (MR-) guided radiotherapy enable daily MR imaging of cancer patients during treatment, which is of interest for treatment response monitoring and biomarker... Show morePurposeSystems for magnetic resonance (MR-) guided radiotherapy enable daily MR imaging of cancer patients during treatment, which is of interest for treatment response monitoring and biomarker discovery using quantitative MRI (qMRI). Here, the performance of a 1.5 T MR-linac regarding qMRI was assessed on phantoms. Additionally, we show the feasibility of qMRI in a prostate cancer patient on this system for the first time.Materials and methodsFour 1.5 T MR-linac systems from four institutes were included in this study. T1 and T2 relaxation times, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, as well as dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images were acquired. Bland–Altman statistics were used, and accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility were determined.ResultsMedian accuracy for T1 ranged over the four systems from 2.7 to 14.3%, for T2 from 10.4 to 14.1%, and for ADC from 1.9 to 2.7%. For DCE images, the accuracy ranged from 12.8 to 35.8% for a gadolinium concentration of 0.5 mM and deteriorated for higher concentrations. Median short-term repeatability for T1 ranged from 0.6 to 5.1%, for T2 from 0.4 to 1.2%, and for ADC from 1.3 to 2.2%. DCE acquisitions showed a coefficient of variation of 0.1–0.6% in the signal intensity. Long-term repeatability was 1.8% for T1, 1.4% for T2, 1.7% for ADC, and 17.9% for DCE. Reproducibility was 11.2% for T1, 2.9% for T2, 2.2% for ADC, and 18.4% for DCE.ConclusionThese results indicate that qMRI on the Unity MR-linac is feasible, accurate, and repeatable which is promising for treatment response monitoring and treatment plan adaptation based on daily qMRI. Show less
Hoogstins, C.; Burggraaf, J.J.; Koller, M.; Handgraaf, H.; Boogerd, L.; Dam, G. van; ... ; Burggraaf, J. 2019
