Background: Surgical resection is the standard of care for parotid gland tumors. Comprehensive reports on the surgical complications of parotidectomy are lacking. This study focuses on surgical... Show moreBackground: Surgical resection is the standard of care for parotid gland tumors. Comprehensive reports on the surgical complications of parotidectomy are lacking. This study focuses on surgical wound complications of parotid gland surgery.Patients and methods: In the period 2002-2012, 390 consecutive patients (395 procedures) who underwent parotid gland surgery were selected for retrospective analysis. Based on subsequent management, the impact of surgical site complications was graded by the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC).Results: In 83 (21.0%) of the procedures, at least one complication was registered. In total, 118 complications were described. Rated to CDC, 61 patients (15.4%) were graded as class 2 or higher. This implies therapy was dictated. Fortyfive (11.4%) of the complications were surgical site infections (551). In 9 patients (2.3%) surgical complications required a surgical intervention under general anesthesia (CDC class 3b), and in 19 patients (4.8%) other invasive treatment (CDC class 3a) was needed.Conclusions: The Clavien-Dindo Classification proved to be very useful for retrospective registration of surgical complications. Of the 61 patients, 33 were managed by conservative therapy. No risk profile was found for patients at risk for direct surgical complications. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved. Show less
Lamers-Kuijper, E.; Heemsbergen, W.; Mourik, A. van; Rasch, C. 2011
Purpose: To find parameters that predict which head and neck patients benefit from a sequentially delivered boost treatment plan compared to a simultaneously delivered plan, with the aim to spare... Show morePurpose: To find parameters that predict which head and neck patients benefit from a sequentially delivered boost treatment plan compared to a simultaneously delivered plan, with the aim to spare the salivary glands.Methods and materials: We evaluated 50 recently treated head and neck cancer patients. Apart from the clinical plan with a sequentially (SEQ) given boost using an Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Technique (IMRT), a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique plan was constructed with the same beam setup. The mean dose to the parotid glands was calculated and compared. The elective nodal areas were bilateral in all cases, with a boost on either one side or both sides of the neck.Results: When the parotid gland volume and the Planning Target Volume (PTV) for the boost overlap there is on average a lower dose to the parotid gland with a SIB technique (-1.2 Gy), which is, however, not significant (p = 0.08).For all parotid glands with no boost PTV overlap, there is a benefit from a SEQ technique compared to a SIB technique for the gland evaluated (on average a 2.5 Gy lower dose to the parotid gland, p < 0.001). When the distance between gland and PTV is 0-1 cm, this difference is on average 0.8 Gy, for 1-2 cm distance 2.9 Gy and for glands with a distance greater than 2 cm, 3.3 Gy. When the lymph nodes on the evaluated side are also included in the boost PTV, however, this relationship between the distance and the gain of a SEQ seems less clear.Conclusions: A sequentially delivered boost technique results in a better treatment plan for most cases, compared to a simultaneous integrated boost IMRT technique, if the boost PTV is more than 1 cm away from at least one parotid gland. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 98 (2011) 51-56 Show less
