BackgroundPain medication may have an impact on the quality of life (QoL) in persons with dementia, but may also influence care dependency and daily functioning. The aim of this study is to... Show moreBackgroundPain medication may have an impact on the quality of life (QoL) in persons with dementia, but may also influence care dependency and daily functioning. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of regularly scheduled paracetamol on care dependency and daily functioning in persons with advanced dementia with low QoL living in long-term care facilities.MethodsThe Quality of life and Paracetamol In advanced Dementia (Q-PID) study was a (block) randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial with paracetamol and placebo across seventeen long-term care facilities across 9 care organizations in the western region of the Netherlands. Participants were >= 65 years, had advanced dementia (Global Deterioration Scale 5-7), and low QoL (QUALIDEM-6D score <= 70). Measurements were performed by nursing staff at the start and at the end of each treatment period of six weeks. Repeated linear mixed models were used to compute differences between randomization groups, with adjustment for period and order effects, and psychotropic use.ResultsNinety-five persons (mean age of 83.9 years, 57.4% female) were enrolled in the Q-PID study. The mean Care Dependency Scale total score was 37.8 (Standard Deviation [SD] 12.9) and the mean Katz-15 total score was 11.9 (SD 2.4). Repeated linear mixed models showed no difference in mean differences of care dependency (paracetamol - 1.0 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) -2.4-0.3], placebo + 0.1 [-1.3-1.5]), and daily functioning (paracetamol + 0.2 [95% CI -0.2-0.6], placebo + 0.1 [-0.3-0.4]).ConclusionsCompared to placebo, no effect of scheduled administration of paracetamol was found on care dependency and daily functioning in persons with advanced dementia with low QoL. Future research should focus on which specific items of care dependency need special attention to improve the care for persons with advanced dementia. A multi-domain approach is needed to enhance and/or maintain QoL of persons with advanced dementia.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register (NTR6766); http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=6766; Trial registration date: 20/10/2017. Show less
Persons with dementia may not always be able to set their own goals and expectations. When persons with dementia are no longer able to assess their own Quality of life (QoL), family, friends and... Show morePersons with dementia may not always be able to set their own goals and expectations. When persons with dementia are no longer able to assess their own Quality of life (QoL), family, friends and professional caregivers need to be their voice, as they are most familiar with their values, goals and needs. QoL in persons with advanced dementia is influenced by many factors, such as environment, background and psychological factors such as depression and agitation.The Q-PID study was a 13-week double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled crossover trial that assessed the effect of paracetamol on QoL, discomfort, pain, neuropsychiatric symptoms, care dependency and daily functioning in 95 persons with moderate to advanced dementia living in long-term care facilities (LTCF).This thesis provides evidence that administration of paracetamol or placebo alone is not effective, i.e., no ‘panacea’, for improving QoL, discomfort, pain, neuropsychiatric symptoms, care dependency and dailyfunctioning in persons with advanced dementia living in LTCF. Personalizing interventions, collaborationbetween different health care workers and family/friends, and combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are important to maintain the best QoL possible, and we recognize that this will be challenging, but not impossible. Show less
BackgroundThe objectives of this study are to determine the effects of regularly scheduled administration of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on quality of life (QoL), discomfort, pain and... Show moreBackgroundThe objectives of this study are to determine the effects of regularly scheduled administration of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on quality of life (QoL), discomfort, pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms of persons with dementia living in long-term care facilities (LTCFs).MethodsA multicentre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial for 13weeks (January 2018 to June 2019) in 17 LTCFs across the west of the Netherlands. Inclusion criteria were age >= 65years, (advanced) dementia and a moderate to low QoL, independent of the presence of pain (QUALIDEM <= 70). Exclusion criteria were the use of regular pain treatment, allergies to the study medication, severe liver disease, use of >4units of alcohol/day, weight<50kg and/or concomitant use of flucloxacillin. Participants received study medication (paracetamol/placebo) in two periods of 6 weeks each (1 week in between as a wash-out period). Randomisation decided in which order participants received paracetamol and placebo. Primary outcomes included QoL (QUALIDEM) and discomfort (DS-DAT), secondary outcomes included pain (MOBID-2) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPI-NH).ResultsNinety-five LTCF residents (mean age 83.9years [SD 7.6], 57.9% females) were included. Repeated linear mixed models showed no difference in mean differences of QUALIDEM (paracetamol +1.3 [95% CI -1.0-3.5], placebo +1.5 [95% CI -0.7-3.8]), DS-DAT (paracetamol -0.1 [95% CI -1.4-1.2], placebo 0.6 [95 CI -0.7-1.8]), MOBID-2 (paracetamol 0.0 [95% CI -0.5-0.5], placebo -0.2 [95% CI -0.7-0.3]) and NPI-NH (paracetamol +1.5 [95% CI -2.3-5.4], placebo -2.1 [95% CI -6.0-1.7]) in favour of either paracetamol or placebo.ConclusionsCompared to placebo, paracetamol showed no positive effect on QoL, discomfort, pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms in persons with advanced dementia with low QoL. It is important to find out more specifically which individual persons with advanced dementia could benefit from pain treatment with paracetamol, and for clinicians to acknowledge that a good assessment, monitoring and multidomain approach is vital for improving QoL in this vulnerable group.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR6766. Trial registration date: 20 October 2017 Show less
Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) are a recent toxicological construct that connects, in a formalized, transparent and quality-controlled way, mechanistic information to apical endpoints for... Show moreAdverse outcome pathways (AOPs) are a recent toxicological construct that connects, in a formalized, transparent and quality-controlled way, mechanistic information to apical endpoints for regulatory purposes. AOP links a molecular initiating event (MIE) to the adverse outcome (AO) via key events (KE), in a way specified by key event relationships (KER). Although this approach to formalize mechanistic toxicological information only started in 2010, over 200 AOPs have already been established. At this stage, new requirements arise, such as the need for harmonization and re-assessment, for continuous updating, as well as for alerting about pitfalls, misuses and limits of applicability. In this review, the history of the AOP concept and its most prominent strengths are discussed, including the advantages of a formalized approach, the systematic collection of weight of evidence, the linkage of mechanisms to apical end points, the examination of the plausibility of epidemiological data, the identification of critical knowledge gaps and the design of mechanistic test methods. To prepare the ground for a broadened and appropriate use of AOPs, some widespread misconceptions are explained. Moreover, potential weaknesses and shortcomings of the current AOP rule set are addressed (1) to facilitate the discussion on its further evolution and (2) to better define appropriate vs. less suitable application areas. Exemplary toxicological studies are presented to discuss the linearity assumptions of AOP, the management of event modifiers and compensatory mechanisms, and whether a separation of toxicodynamics from toxicokinetics including metabolism is possible in the framework of pathway plasticity. Suggestions on how to compromise between different needs of AOP stakeholders have been added. A clear definition of open questions and limitations is provided to encourage further progress in the field. Show less
Oral anticoagulant therapy has changed little since the development of the coumarin drugs after the Second World War. The basic nature of the therapy, i.e. the balancing between thrombosis and... Show moreOral anticoagulant therapy has changed little since the development of the coumarin drugs after the Second World War. The basic nature of the therapy, i.e. the balancing between thrombosis and haemorrhage, makes it a therapy difficult to manage. Add to this the many influences from co-morbidity, co-medication, diet, metabolism, etc, and it becomes clear that there is little inherent stability to coumarin anti-vitamin K treatment. The studies included in this thesis were set up to look at different ways in which the quality of oral anticoagulant treatment can be improved. We looked at the percentage of time spent within the predefined INR target range with different coumarins (acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon), at patient self-management to further improve treatment quality in the setting of a highly structured system of anticoagulation clinics and the effects of this treatment modality on the quality of life of the patients. We also looked at the effects of chronic paracetamol intake on the INR, and at the relationship between the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy and recurrent thrombosis. Show less
