The value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission-tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for staging patients with (very) high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is unknown.... Show moreThe value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission-tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for staging patients with (very) high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is unknown. In this study among NMIBC patients referred for RC, FDG-PET/CT detected metastases that were not detected by CT, leading to treatment changes in 10% of patients. However, the use of FDG-PET/CT should be weighed against its disad-vantages, including false-positive lesions. Introduction and Objectives: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is increasingly used in the preoperative staging of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The clinical added value of FDG-PET/CT in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is unknown. In this study, the value of FDG-PET/CT in addition to contrast enhanced (CE)-CT was evaluated in high-risk NMIBC before radical cystec-tomy (RC). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with high risk and very-high risk urothelial NMIBC scheduled for RC in a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2020. Patients underwent staging with CE-CT (chest and abdomen/pelvis) and FDG-PET/CT. We assessed the clinical disease stage before and after FDG-PET/CT and the treatment recommendation based on the stage before and after FDG-PET/CT. The accuracy of CT and FDG-PET/CT for identifying metastatic disease was defined by the receiver-operating curve using a reference -standard including histopathology/cytology (if available), imaging and follow-up. Results: A total of 92 patients were identified (median age: 71 years). In 14/92 (15%) patients, FDG-PET/CT detected metastasis (12 suspicious lymph nodes and 4 distant metastases). The disease stage changed in 11/92 (12%) patients based on additional FDG-PET/CT findings. FDG-PET/CT led to a different treatment in 9/92 (10%) patients. According to the reference standard, 25/92 (27%) patients had metastases. The sensitivit y, specificit y and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was 36%, 93% and 77% respectively, versus 12%, 97% and 74% of CE-CT only. The area under the ROC curve was 0.643 for FDG-PET/CT and 0.545 for CT, P = .036. Conclusion: The addition of FDG-PET/CT to CE-CT imaging changed the treatment in 10% of patients and proved to be a valuable diagnostic tool in a selected subgroup of NMIBC patients scheduled for RC. Show less
