In this retrospective cohort study of the outcomes of infants born <32 week's gestation, moving from a traditional open bay neonatal unit to a new single-room unit was not associated with... Show moreIn this retrospective cohort study of the outcomes of infants born <32 week's gestation, moving from a traditional open bay neonatal unit to a new single-room unit was not associated with significant improvements in morbidity or mortality. Objective: In response to the increasing focus on family-centred care, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environments have gradually shifted towards the single-room design. However, the assumed benefits of this emerging design remain a subject of debate. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of single-room versus open-bay care on the risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm neonates. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level III NICU. Patients: Neonates born Main outcome measures: Mortality and morbidities of a cohort of neonates admitted to a new, single-room unit (SRU) were compared with a historical cohort of neonates admitted to an open-bay unit (OBU). Group differences were evaluated and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Three-hundred and fifty-six and 343 neonates were admitted to the SRU and OBU, respectively. No difference in neonatal morbidities and mortality were observed between cohorts (bronchopulmonary dysplasia: OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.58, p=0.44; retinopathy of the prematurity stage >= 2: OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.22, p=0.10; intraventricular haemorrhage: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.34, p=0.86; mortality: OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.75 to 3.20, p=0.28). In adjusted regression models, single-room care was independently associated with a decreased risk of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus (adjusted OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95). No independent association between single-room care and any of the other investigated outcomes was observed. Conclusions: Implementation of single-rooms in our NICU did not lead to a significant reduction in neonatal morbidity and mortality outcomes. Show less
Background and aim: To investigate whether neonates with prenatally detected congenital heart defects (CHD) demonstrate cerebral abnormalities on early preoperative cranial ultrasound (CUS),... Show moreBackground and aim: To investigate whether neonates with prenatally detected congenital heart defects (CHD) demonstrate cerebral abnormalities on early preoperative cranial ultrasound (CUS), compared to healthy neonates, and to measure brain structures to assess brain growth and development in both groups.Study design, subjects and outcome measures: Prospective cohort study with controls. Between September 2013 and May 2016 consecutive cases of prenatally detected severe isolated CHD were included. Neonatal CUS was performed shortly after birth, before surgery and in a healthy control group. Blinded images were reviewed for brain abnormalities and various measurements of intracranial structures were compared.Results: CUS was performed in 59 healthy controls and 50 CHD cases. Physiological CUS variants were present in 54% of controls and in 52% of CHD cases. Abnormalities requiring additional monitoring (both significant and minor) were identified in four controls (7%) and five CHD neonates (10%). Significant abnormalities were only identified in four CHD neonates (8%) and never in controls. A separate analysis of an additional 8 CHD neonates after endovascular intervention demonstrated arterial stroke in two cases that underwent balloon atrioseptostomy (BAS). Cerebral measurements were smaller in CHD neonates, except for the cerebrospinal fluid measurements, which were similar to the controls.Conclusions: The prevalence of significant preoperative CUS abnormalities in CHD cases was lower than previously reported, which may be partially caused by a guarding effect of a prenatal diagnosis. Arterial stroke occurred only in cases after BAS. As expected, neonates with CHD display slightly smaller head size and cerebral growth. Show less
