Mucosal melanomas (MM) are malignant tumours arising from melanocytes located at the mucosal lining of the head and neck region or the respiratory, gastrointestinal, anorectal, or genital tract.... Show moreMucosal melanomas (MM) are malignant tumours arising from melanocytes located at the mucosal lining of the head and neck region or the respiratory, gastrointestinal, anorectal, or genital tract. Due to the low incidence the disease is still poorly understood and management is mostly based on guidelines of cutaneous melanoma (CM). Survival of patients with MM is poor and regardless of stage is worse than that of CM. This is explained by the advanced stage at diagnosis and high recurrence rates of MM. Moreover, whilst immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape in CM, in MM, the efficacy is low and survival has not improved since the introduction of these therapies.The MM located at the vulva (VMM) account for 60% of the female genital tract MM and together with the head and neck region are the most common locations of MM. In line with the MM located at all other locations, prognosis is poor. Whilst the majority of the patients is diagnosed with local disease, the aggressive course of disease is demonstrated by the high recurrence rates with short time to recurrence with a median overall survival of 33 months. To improve outcomes in MM, there is a critical need for clinical trials specifically designed for this disease and international collaboration. Show less
Mucosal melanomas are rare and only a small portion bear BRAF mutations while cutaneous melanomas have a much higher prevalence and often harbor BRAF mutations. We present two cases in which, after... Show moreMucosal melanomas are rare and only a small portion bear BRAF mutations while cutaneous melanomas have a much higher prevalence and often harbor BRAF mutations. We present two cases in which, after a malignant melanocytic mucosal lesion with a BRAF mutation was found, the primary cutaneous source was identified and clonality confirmed between the lesions. In both cases, primary lesions occurred on the scalp, an often-overlooked site. Both lesions showed signs of regression implying that in due time these lesions could have been fully regressed and might never have been detected. In that case, the metastatic mucosal lesion would erroneously be identified as a BRAF-mutated mucosal melanoma. These cases give warrant; a careful dermatological inspection should be instigated when confronted with a BRAF-mutated mucosal melanoma. We hypothesize that some BRAF-mutated mucosal melanomas might actually represent metastases of regressed cutaneous melanomas. Show less
Background: Mucosal melanoma (MM) is rare and has a poor prognosis. Since 2011, new effective treatments are available for advanced melanoma. It is unclear whether patients with mucosal melanoma... Show moreBackground: Mucosal melanoma (MM) is rare and has a poor prognosis. Since 2011, new effective treatments are available for advanced melanoma. It is unclear whether patients with mucosal melanoma equally benefit from these new treatments compared with patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM).Methods: Patients with advanced MM and CM diagnosed between 2013 and 2017 were included from a nationwide population-based registry the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method (also for a propensity score-matched cohort). A Cox model was used to analyse the association of possible prognostic factors with OS.Results: In total, 120 patients with MM and 2960 patients with CM were included. Median OS was 8.7 months and 14.5 months, respectively. Patients with MM were older (median age 70 versus 65 years) and more often female (60% versus 41%), compared with CM. In total, 77% and 2% of the MM patients were treated with first-line immunotherapy and targeted therapy, respectively, compared with 49% and 33% of the CM patients. In contrast to CM, OS for MM did not improve for patients diagnosed in 2015-2017, compared with 2013-2014. ECOG performance score >= 1 (HR = 1.99 [1.26-3.15; p = 0.003]) and elevated LDH level (HR = 1.63 [0.96-2.76]; p = 0.069) in MM were associated with worse survival.Conclusions: Within the era of immune and targeted therapies, prognosis for patients with advanced MM has not improved as much as for CM. Collaboration is necessary to enlarge sample size for research to improve immunotherapeutic strategies and identify targetable mutations. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less