BackgroundMagnetic Resonance acquisition is a time consuming process, making it susceptible to patient motion during scanning. Even motion in the order of a millimeter can introduce severe blurring... Show moreBackgroundMagnetic Resonance acquisition is a time consuming process, making it susceptible to patient motion during scanning. Even motion in the order of a millimeter can introduce severe blurring and ghosting artifacts, potentially necessitating re-acquisition. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be accelerated by acquiring only a fraction of k-space, combined with advanced reconstruction techniques leveraging coil sensitivity profiles and prior knowledge. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based reconstruction techniques have recently been popularized, but generally assume an ideal setting without intra-scan motion.PurposeTo retrospectively detect and quantify the severity of motion artifacts in undersampled MRI data. This may prove valuable as a safety mechanism for AI-based approaches, provide useful information to the reconstruction method, or prompt for re-acquisition while the patient is still in the scanner.MethodsWe developed a deep learning approach that detects and quantifies motion artifacts in undersampled brain MRI. We demonstrate that synthetically motion-corrupted data can be leveraged to train the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based motion artifact estimator, generalizing well to real-world data. Additionally, we leverage the motion artifact estimator by using it as a selector for a motion-robust reconstruction model in case a considerable amount of motion was detected, and a high data consistency model otherwise.ResultsTraining and validation were performed on 4387 and 1304 synthetically motion-corrupted images and their uncorrupted counterparts, respectively. Testing was performed on undersampled in vivo motion-corrupted data from 28 volunteers, where our model distinguished head motion from motion-free scans with 91% and 96% accuracy when trained on synthetic and on real data, respectively. It predicted a manually defined quality label ('Good', 'Medium' or 'Bad' quality) correctly in 76% and 85% of the time when trained on synthetic and real data, respectively. When used as a selector it selected the appropriate reconstruction network 93% of the time, achieving near optimal SSIM values.ConclusionsThe proposed method quantified motion artifact severity in undersampled MRI data with high accuracy, enabling real-time motion artifact detection that can help improve the safety and quality of AI-based reconstructions. Show less
